Clearwater Intermediate School in Clearwater, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 45.

1220 PALMETTO ST
Clearwater, FL 33755

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Disston Gifted Center School (15.9 miles):

98
Davis Elementary School (11.5 miles):

74
Tarpon Springs Elementary School (12.3 miles):

62
Farnell Middle School (11.6 miles):

51
Clearwater Intermediate School:

45
North Shore Elementary School (15.3 miles):

43
Twin Lakes Elementary School (18.6 miles):

33
Melrose Elementary School (17.1 miles):

20
Pace Center For Girls School (10.7 miles):

0
Clearwater Intermediate School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pinellas County:

51
Clearwater:

44
Clearwater Intermediate School:

45

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 298-1616 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 3341
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 5 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 469-4189
Principal: Freddie Robinson
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 50
Senate District: 13
School Web Address: http://it.pinellas.k12.fl.us/schools/clearwater-ms

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 13 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 13 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 13 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

65%
State average from 13 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 13 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 12 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 13 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 13 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

616
State average from 13 schools:

498
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 12 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 13 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 13 schools:

44%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 380 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 380 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 349
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 342

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 347
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 343
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 169 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 169 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 305 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 305 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 278
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 273

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 274
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 12 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 11 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 12 schools:

90%
Meeting High Standards in Science
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

61%
State average from 12 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 11 schools:

68%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 12 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 11 schools:

63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 11 schools:

64%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

625
State average from 11 schools:

555
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 12 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 12 schools:

45%
Minority Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 13 schools:

38%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 374 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 373 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 340
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 331

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 332
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 192 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 167
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 277 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 278 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 243

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 253
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

87%
State average from 12 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

87%
State average from 12 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

89%
State average from 13 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

57%
State average from 12 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 12 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

87%
State average from 12 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 12 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 12 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

635
State average from 12 schools:

533
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 12 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

17%
State average from 12 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

48%
State average from 12 schools:

39%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 381 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 382 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 350
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 348
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 203 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 270 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 270 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 244

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 247
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

27%
State average from 10 schools:

56%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

21%
State average from 10 schools:

52%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 10 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

11%
State average from 10 schools:

34%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 10 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 10 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

66%
State average from 10 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 10 schools:

65%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

394
State average from 10 schools:

474
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 10 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 10 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 10 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 399 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 399 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 369
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 229 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 263 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 263 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 243
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

24%
State average from 9 schools:

54%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

18%
State average from 9 schools:

52%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

76%
State average from 9 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 9 schools:

60%
Making Math Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 9 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 9 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

301
State average from 9 schools:

379
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 9 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

66%
State average from 9 schools:

64%
Minority Rate
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

39%
State average from 9 schools:

49%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 394 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 394 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 105
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 377
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 377
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 237 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 65
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 230
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 230
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 64
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 243
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 243
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 111
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 111
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

24%
State average from 9 schools:

53%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

22%
State average from 9 schools:

50%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

68%
State average from 9 schools:

75%
Making Reading Gains
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

51%
State average from 9 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

60%
State average from 9 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 9 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

288
State average from 9 schools:

366
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 9 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

66%
State average from 9 schools:

63%
Minority Rate
Here:

34%
State average from 9 schools:

47%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1545
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1763
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

1%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

29%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

1156
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

222
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

76%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

12%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

6
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

1412
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

53%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

22%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1640
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

34%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1730
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

44%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

22%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1727
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

54%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

71%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

65%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

1567
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

358
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

27%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

86%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1732
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

26%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1455
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

49%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1499
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

62%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

44%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

23%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1772
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

289
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1817
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1555
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

1259
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1445
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1641
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1670
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

265
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1734
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1619
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1673
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1398
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1518
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1643
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1829
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 179
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 87
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1497
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

1719
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1228
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

235
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1465
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1596
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

1708
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

1716
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1506
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

1702
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1414
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1526
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1662
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1804
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1794
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

184
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

170
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

80
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

53
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

619
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

28
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

92
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

642
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

36
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

95
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

38
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

9
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

107
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

36
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

35
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

36
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 169
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

344
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 80%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 108
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

242
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 12%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1306
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1321
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1222
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 99

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

1485
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1484
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1353
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 132

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1621
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1606
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1500
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 106

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1727
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1721
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1599
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 122

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1458
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1470
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1370
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 100

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1438
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1436
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1409
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 27

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1692
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1688
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1532
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 156

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1815
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1818
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1691
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 127

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

626
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 34
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 95
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 41
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 106
Mean Scale Score
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

658
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 45
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 94
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 47
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

631
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 45
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 95
Mean Scale Score
Here:

639
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 106
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 55
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 94
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 94
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

252
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 20%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 87%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Clearwater, FL
  5. Clearwater Intermediate School in Clearwater, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.