Clifford Meigs Middle School in Shalimar, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 67.

150 RICHBOURG AVE
Shalimar, FL 32579

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Liza Jackson Preparatory School (4.3 miles):

84
Max Bruner Junior Middle School (3.6 miles):

76
Clifford Meigs Middle School:

67
C. W. Ruckel Middle School (8.1 miles):

65
Holley-Navarre Middle School (18.5 miles):

55
Destin Middle School (10.1 miles):

51
W. C. Pryor Middle School (2.4 miles):

37
Emerald Coast Career Institute S School (3.6 miles):

24
Silver Sands-Excep. Children School (3.8 miles):

20
Clifford Meigs Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Okaloosa County:

53
Shalimar:

70
Clifford Meigs Middle School:

67

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (850) 833-4301 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 46
School number: 82
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: OKALOOSA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 833-9392
Principal: Lamar White
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
Senate District: 4

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

58%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

555
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 479 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 480 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 140
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 462
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 454

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 463
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 455
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 286 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 287 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 275
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

51%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

533
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 309 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 309 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 285

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 294
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 286
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 225 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

50%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

564
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 330 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 329 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 310
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 308
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 169 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

68%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

591
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 694 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 694 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 240
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 682
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 682
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 503 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 503 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 168
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 498
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 498
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

469
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 691 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 690 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 210
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 660
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 660
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 138

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 466
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 466
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 222 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 58

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 206
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 206
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

76%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

459
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1541
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

340
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1666
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

34%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1709
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1860
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1948
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2028
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

340
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

332
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1511
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1572
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1679
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

30%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1767
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

332
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1909
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2002
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1442
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1655
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1716
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1656
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1748
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1869
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1445
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1558
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1678
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1602
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1789
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1854
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 170
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 105
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1382
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

313
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1615
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1640
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

308
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1658
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1758
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1884
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1359
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1516
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

314
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1662
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1622
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

298
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1783
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1900
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

178
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

634
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

62
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

157
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

656
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

153
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

107
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

44
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

104
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

671
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

57
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

101
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

59
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 155
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

288
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 61%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 108
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

315
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1811
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1819
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1746
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1911
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1921
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1816
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 104

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1979
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1980
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1923
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 57

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1757
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1768
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1762
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1943
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1942
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1796
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 147

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1977
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1984
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1922
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 62

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 241
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 79
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 208
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 238
Mean Scale Score
Here:

710
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 82
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 241
Mean Scale Score
Here:

688
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 208
Mean Scale Score
Here:

719
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 88
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 238
Mean Scale Score
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

725
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 86
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 238
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
CLIFFORD MEIGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

317
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 92%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Shalimar, FL
  5. Clifford Meigs Middle School in Shalimar, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.