Community Education Partners-Nw School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 8.

6125 N ORANGE BLOSSOM TRA
Orlando, FL 32810

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (5.6 miles):

98
Lake Howell High School (9.7 miles):

68
Rosenwald Center School (6.0 miles):

60
Ocoee Middle School (7.7 miles):

53
Legacy Charter School (8.1 miles):

40
Corner Lake Middle School (18.4 miles):

24
Legacy High Charter School (8.1 miles):

12
Community Education Partners-Nw School:

8
Community Education Partners-Nw School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Community Education Partners-Nw:

8

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (321) 281-2540 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 84
School type: Senior High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (321) 281-2650
Principal: Gary Preisser
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 38
Senate District: 19

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 133 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

31%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 133 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

67%
State average from 132 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 133 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

480
State average from 133 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 132 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 137 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 137 schools:

53%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 858 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 858 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 248
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 802
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 775

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 800
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 772
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 213 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 213 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 186

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 186
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 290 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 290 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 272
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 266
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 274 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 246

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 250
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 703 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 703 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 206
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 655
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 632

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 654
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 630
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 141 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

54%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 139 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

26%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

62%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 136 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

69%
State average from 133 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

474
State average from 133 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 134 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 132 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 139 schools:

52%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 846 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 846 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 216
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 789
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 764

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 791
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 767
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 194
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 304 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 304 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 287
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 279

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 281
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 258 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 258 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 234
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 665 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 665 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 171
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 622
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 604

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 623
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 606
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 183 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 124 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

52%
State average from 124 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 125 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

33%
State average from 122 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

60%
State average from 122 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 122 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 122 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 122 schools:

70%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

482
State average from 122 schools:

535
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 124 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 126 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 125 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 855 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 858 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 224
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 804
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 768

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 806
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 771
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 225 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 319 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 322 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 256 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 256 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 241
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 230
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 621 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 624 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 149
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 578
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 551

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 580
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 554
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 197 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 187
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

7%
State average from 63 schools:

49%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

18%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

66%
State average from 63 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

3%
State average from 63 schools:

37%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

31%
State average from 63 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 63 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

48%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 63 schools:

63%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

312
State average from 63 schools:

461
Percent Tested
Here:

96%
State average from 63 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 63 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 445 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 443 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 218
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 314 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

5%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 338 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

12%
State average from 62 schools:

49%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

22%
State average from 62 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

58%
State average from 62 schools:

82%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

43%
State average from 62 schools:

57%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 62 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 62 schools:

62%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

254
State average from 62 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

95%
State average from 62 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 63 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

80%
State average from 63 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 529 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 518 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 169
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 345
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 343
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 63
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 362 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 355 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 112

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 242
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 243
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 400 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 395 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 129

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 267
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 268
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

8%
State average from 52 schools:

48%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

22%
State average from 52 schools:

56%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

62%
State average from 53 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

45%
State average from 53 schools:

54%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 53 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 53 schools:

59%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

260
State average from 53 schools:

362
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 53 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 53 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 52 schools:

51%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1455
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

82%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1650
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1706
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1663
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1761
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

308
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1824
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

1677
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

62%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

1617
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

12%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

81%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

4%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

6%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

4%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

26%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

56%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

11%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1461
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1586
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

36%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1673
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

24%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

22%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1685
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1756
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1821
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

1777
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

40%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

24%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1820
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

38%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

35%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

47%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1421
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1683
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

337
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1682
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1659
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

302
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1720
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1810
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1632
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1571
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

258
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1487
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1604
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1637
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

326
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1657
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1704
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1826
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1731
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1781
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

274
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 131
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 229
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 46
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 33%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1487
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1632
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1664
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1609
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1686
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1833
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

1736
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1646
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

256
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1484
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

340
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1492
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

1595
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1691
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1856
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1784
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1834
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

128
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

645
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

100
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

654
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

95
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

77
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

336
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

52
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

269
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

57
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

236
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

87
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

38
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

10
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

52
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

45
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 102
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

303
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 236
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

285
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 60
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

226
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 2%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 33%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1458
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 51%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1497
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1436
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 61

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1533
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 74%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1501
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1471
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 30

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1639
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 69%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1625
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1578
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 47

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1665
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 64%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1683
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1671
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 12

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1615
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 60%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1600
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1717
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -117

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1393
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 55%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1347
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1457
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -110

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1611
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1597
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1417
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 180

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1707
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 70%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1700
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

1619
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 81

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1779
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 62%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1770
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

1746
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 25

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1863
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 61%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

1862
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1822
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 40

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 60
Mean Scale Score
Here:

646
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 40
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 76
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 38
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109
Mean Scale Score
Here:

661
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 39
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 40
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 93
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 41
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 60
Mean Scale Score
Here:

638
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 35
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 77
Mean Scale Score
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-NW:

657
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 45
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 108
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 44
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 106
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 47
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 93
Mean Scale Score
Here:

695
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 44
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 107
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

230
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 68%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 49%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 104
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

244
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 11%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 66%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 35%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Community Education Partners-Nw School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.