Creekside Middle School in Port Orange, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 38.

6801 AIRPORT RD
Port Orange, FL 32128

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
David C Hinson Senior Middle School (12.3 miles):

84
Creekside Middle School (0.0 miles):

58
Boston Avenue School (15.3 miles):

47
Creekside Middle School:

38
Euclid Avenue Learning Center School (16.6 miles):

36
Deltona Middle School (19.1 miles):

34
Holly Hill Middle School (12.2 miles):

22
Pace Center For Girls School (14.7 miles):

1
Creekside Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Volusia County:

42
Port Orange:

57
Creekside Middle School:

38

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (386) 304-5500 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 64
School number: 7791
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: VOLUSIA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 304-5508
Principal: Karen M Beattie
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 24
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 28
Senate District: 7
School Web Address: http://btw.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

64%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

585
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

17%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1181 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1181 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 399
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1092

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1093
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 979 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 979 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 339
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 956
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 902

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 957
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 902
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 334 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 334 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 315
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 316
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 298
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 133 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

597
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1182 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1182 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 395
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1081

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1151
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1084
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1006 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1006 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 333
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 982
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 928

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 985
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 931
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 263 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 263 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 223

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 223
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

584
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

17%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1182 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1181 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 355
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1072

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1142
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1072
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1023 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1022 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 312
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 989
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 930

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 989
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 930
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 175

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 188
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 176
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

13%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

41%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

75%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

9%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

41%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

386
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: F

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 770 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 762 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 348
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 720
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 715
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 417 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 413 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 191
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 392
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 388
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 344 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 340 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 152
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 320
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 319
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 603 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 597 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 267
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 570
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 565
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (91%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

11%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

39%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

70%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

42%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

282
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: F

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 911 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 885 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 401
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 825
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 799
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 473 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 461 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 208

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 429
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 416
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 425 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 412 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 188

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 386
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 373
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 768 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 746 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 339

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 703
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 684
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 54
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 119
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 111
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (94%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 65

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 154
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 152
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

11%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

36%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

45%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

293
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: F

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

83%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1818
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1939
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1976
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1728
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

276
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1711
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

25%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

53%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1763
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1865
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1971
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1817
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1923
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

308
State average:

326
Percent Passing
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

71%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1829
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1908
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1985
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1709
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1686
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

256
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1768
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1878
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1950
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1840
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1911
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 404
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 276
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 54%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1796
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1884
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1974
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1672
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1680
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1775
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1860
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1952
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1817
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1889
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

397
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

77
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

401
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

699
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

80
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

355
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

705
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

79
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

336
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

33
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

325
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

679
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

38
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 361
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

323
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 322
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

257
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 25%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 67%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1692
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1706
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1648
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 59

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1667
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1671
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1676
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -6

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1818
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1829
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1730
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 99

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1869
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1870
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1828
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 43

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 396
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 37
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 367
Mean Scale Score
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

677
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 35
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 396
Mean Scale Score
CREEKSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

690
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 52
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 365
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 44
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 355
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

249
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 19%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 67%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 49%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Port Orange, FL
  5. Creekside Middle School in Port Orange, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.