All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Sunrise Manor, NV
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School in Sunrise Manor, Nevada (NV)
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School in Sunrise Manor, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
45 .
Address:
Principal: Jacqueline Conarton
Phone Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-1550
Fax Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-1556
Website: schools.ccsd.net
Title I School: Yes
AYP School Designation: In Need of Improvement (Year 4)
Special Programs: Class-Size Reduction: Yes
Other nearby schools ratings:
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Clark County:
41Sunrise Manor:
27Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School:
45
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: In Need of Improvement (Year 4)
Participation All Students:
100.0%Asian:
100.0%Hispanic:
100.0%Black:
100.0%White:
100.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%
Percent Proficient Asian:
92.5%White:
84.5%All Students:
80.4%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
78.9%Hispanic:
78.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
77.8%Black:
68.2%Individual Education Plan Students:
56.3%
Math School Math AYP Designation: In Need of Improvement (Year 4)
Participation All Students:
100.0%Asian:
100.0%Hispanic:
100.0%Black:
100.0%White:
100.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%
Percent Proficient Asian:
86.3%White:
76.9%All Students:
60.3%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
54.6%Black:
54.5%Hispanic:
49.9%Limited English Proficiency Students:
48.6%Individual Education Plan Students:
23.9%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate
American Indian:
97.7%Asian:
97.5%Limited English Proficiency Students:
95.9%Black:
95.8%All Students:
95.7%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
95.6%White:
95.5%Hispanic:
95.5%Two or more Races:
95.0%Pacific Islander:
94.6%Individual Education Plan Students:
93.2%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 129 -2.1% 1.9% 10.9% 13.8% 51.6% 44.7% 32.0% 34.4% 5.5% 7.1%
Male 67 -21.4% -5.7% 15.2% 18.1% 66.7% 48.0% 16.7% 29.5% 1.5% 4.4%
Female 62 18.5% 9.7% 6.5% 9.4% 35.5% 41.3% 48.4% 39.5% 9.7% 9.7%
Asian 19 2.5% 15.6% 10.5% 7.2% 47.4% 37.6% 42.1% 44.2% 0.0% 11.0%
Hispanic 46 -15.7% -10.6% 10.9% 20.9% 65.2% 50.1% 19.6% 25.8% 4.3% 3.2%
Black 20 -4.6% -7.3% 25.0% 18.2% 40.0% 49.5% 25.0% 28.1% 10.0% 4.2%
White 42 14.1% 11.0% 4.9% 8.6% 41.5% 40.8% 46.3% 40.7% 7.3% 10.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 10 -28.5% -25.5% 33.3% 40.5% 55.6% 45.4% 11.1% 12.3% 0.0% 1.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 30 -19.6% -14.1% 13.3% 23.5% 66.7% 51.0% 16.7% 23.0% 3.3% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 48 0.0% -10.0% 14.6% 20.0% 45.8% 50.3% 37.5% 26.3% 2.1% 3.3%
Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 119 22.9% 12.1% 13.4% 16.2% 36.1% 44.1% 43.7% 32.9% 6.7% 6.7%
Male 64 13.1% 4.2% 18.8% 21.3% 40.6% 47.1% 37.5% 27.4% 3.1% 4.3%
Female 55 34.3% 20.6% 7.3% 10.9% 30.9% 41.0% 50.9% 38.8% 10.9% 9.3%
Asian 22 49.8% 27.4% 0.0% 9.7% 22.7% 35.4% 63.6% 42.8% 13.6% 12.1%
Hispanic 38 9.3% 0.3% 21.1% 23.9% 42.1% 48.3% 34.2% 24.8% 2.6% 3.0%
White 49 27.6% 20.5% 12.2% 10.5% 32.7% 41.4% 46.9% 38.8% 8.2% 9.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 16 -8.8% -14.6% 37.5% 46.5% 43.8% 40.5% 18.8% 11.7% 0.0% 1.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 11.0% -3.6% 19.2% 27.4% 42.3% 48.7% 38.5% 21.5% 0.0% 2.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 32 10.0% 0.4% 21.9% 23.1% 40.6% 49.0% 34.4% 24.9% 3.1% 3.1%
Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 5
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
3.6%Nevada:
7.3%
Approaches Standard This School:
60.3%Nevada:
47.5%
Meets Standard This School:
34.8%State:
40.7%
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : -27.6%State : -18.6%
Male
This School : -38.1%State : -26.3%
Female
Here : -17.3%State : -10.3%
Asian
This School : -5.5%State : -2.0%
Hispanic
This School : -40.1%State : -27.2%
Black
Here : -22.6%Nevada : -27.0%
White
This School : -8.3%Nevada : -10.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students
This School : -35.9%State : -31.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : -33.9%State : -28.2%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 142 -27.6% -18.6% 3.6% 7.3% 60.3% 47.5% 34.8% 40.7% 1.4% 4.5%
Male 71 -38.1% -26.3% 2.9% 10.2% 71.4% 52.3% 25.7% 34.5% 0.0% 3.0%
Female 71 -17.3% -10.3% 4.2% 4.2% 49.3% 42.3% 43.7% 47.3% 2.8% 6.2%
Asian 12 -5.5% -2.0% 0.0% 2.7% 41.7% 35.5% 58.3% 51.7% 0.0% 10.1%
Hispanic 80 -40.1% -27.2% 5.0% 9.3% 71.3% 54.0% 23.8% 34.3% 0.0% 2.3%
Black 18 -22.6% -27.0% 0.0% 10.2% 58.8% 53.0% 41.2% 34.4% 0.0% 2.4%
White 27 -8.3% -10.3% 3.7% 5.2% 40.7% 41.3% 51.9% 47.0% 3.7% 6.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 61 -35.9% -31.2% 6.6% 10.9% 65.6% 56.6% 27.9% 30.6% 0.0% 2.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 88 -33.9% -28.2% 4.6% 10.2% 65.5% 54.2% 29.9% 33.4% 0.0% 2.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 145 -18.3% -17.2% 0.7% 7.7% 53.8% 45.7% 41.4% 41.9% 4.1% 4.7%
Male 86 -16.1% -25.2% 1.2% 10.6% 51.2% 50.8% 44.2% 35.6% 3.5% 2.9%
Female 59 -21.4% -8.8% 0.0% 4.7% 57.6% 40.3% 37.3% 48.5% 5.1% 6.5%
Asian 23 -11.6% -1.8% 0.0% 3.8% 47.8% 34.2% 52.2% 52.7% 0.0% 9.3%
Hispanic 78 -22.8% -26.4% 0.0% 9.7% 59.0% 52.9% 37.2% 35.0% 3.8% 2.4%
Black 13 -33.0% -27.0% 7.7% 10.6% 61.5% 52.6% 30.8% 34.1% 0.0% 2.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 24 -34.6% -44.1% 0.0% 17.6% 70.8% 62.8% 29.2% 19.3% 0.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 80 -25.1% -27.2% 1.3% 10.8% 60.0% 52.6% 37.5% 34.3% 1.3% 2.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 135 -5.8% -4.9% 5.2% 8.9% 48.9% 44.3% 43.7% 40.4% 2.2% 6.4%
Male 70 -13.1% -13.2% 8.6% 12.5% 52.9% 49.0% 38.6% 34.4% 0.0% 4.1%
Female 65 2.1% 3.8% 1.5% 5.2% 44.6% 39.3% 49.2% 46.7% 4.6% 8.8%
Asian 23 17.9% 10.1% 4.3% 5.4% 26.1% 32.8% 65.2% 49.4% 4.3% 12.5%
Hispanic 63 -12.0% -13.8% 6.3% 11.3% 54.0% 50.8% 38.1% 34.9% 1.6% 3.1%
Black 14 -8.8% -14.2% 14.3% 12.8% 42.9% 49.6% 42.9% 33.2% 0.0% 4.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 -24.8% -30.6% 7.7% 19.4% 65.4% 59.5% 26.9% 20.2% 0.0% 0.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 68 -14.9% -15.5% 7.4% 12.6% 55.9% 51.2% 33.8% 33.2% 2.9% 3.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 148 -19.7% -7.5% 13.6% 9.8% 54.4% 46.0% 27.2% 38.8% 4.8% 5.3%
Male 64 -26.7% -15.5% 15.6% 13.3% 59.4% 50.5% 21.9% 32.8% 3.1% 3.3%
Female 81 -13.0% 0.9% 10.0% 6.2% 51.3% 41.3% 32.5% 45.1% 6.3% 7.4%
Asian 20 3.3% 6.4% 0.0% 5.2% 45.0% 36.7% 45.0% 48.0% 10.0% 10.1%
Hispanic 61 -30.4% -18.0% 14.8% 13.8% 63.9% 52.5% 19.7% 31.2% 1.6% 2.5%
Black 29 -20.7% -15.8% 24.1% 13.3% 44.8% 50.8% 24.1% 32.6% 6.9% 3.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 -51.7% -38.3% 28.6% 38.2% 71.4% 48.4% 0.0% 12.6% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 29 -34.5% -34.2% 27.6% 23.3% 55.2% 59.2% 13.8% 17.0% 3.4% 0.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 72 -23.9% -19.0% 18.1% 14.3% 54.2% 53.0% 25.0% 30.5% 2.8% 2.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 133 -8.0% 8.1% 14.3% 10.3% 54.1% 42.0% 30.1% 40.1% 1.5% 7.6%
Male 57 -13.3% -0.1% 15.8% 13.9% 57.9% 46.6% 26.3% 34.5% 0.0% 5.0%
Female 76 -4.1% 16.8% 13.2% 6.5% 51.3% 37.1% 32.9% 46.1% 2.6% 10.4%
Asian 17 7.5% 22.0% 5.9% 5.2% 47.1% 33.2% 41.2% 48.1% 5.9% 13.5%
Hispanic 66 -15.4% -3.3% 18.2% 14.5% 57.6% 49.2% 22.7% 32.8% 1.5% 3.5%
Black 16 -14.6% 0.5% 37.5% 13.6% 37.5% 46.3% 25.0% 35.1% 0.0% 5.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 10 -39.6% -23.9% 60.0% 37.6% 40.0% 46.7% 0.0% 14.2% 0.0% 1.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 28 -32.5% -22.3% 35.7% 26.8% 57.1% 55.9% 7.1% 16.9% 0.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 50 -15.6% -3.5% 18.0% 15.0% 58.0% 48.9% 22.0% 32.8% 2.0% 3.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 174 -1.7% 5.3% 13.6% 11.1% 48.5% 44.0% 34.3% 38.4% 3.6% 6.5%
Male 87 -13.7% -2.4% 17.6% 14.8% 56.5% 48.0% 25.9% 33.1% 0.0% 4.1%
Female 87 10.4% 13.2% 9.5% 7.3% 40.5% 40.0% 42.9% 43.9% 7.1% 8.9%
Asian 22 1.3% 18.1% 4.5% 5.2% 54.5% 37.1% 40.9% 46.2% 0.0% 11.5%
Hispanic 67 -5.8% -6.4% 18.5% 16.0% 47.7% 50.8% 30.8% 30.2% 3.1% 3.0%
Black 28 4.8% -4.0% 14.8% 15.4% 40.7% 49.0% 44.4% 32.3% 0.0% 3.3%
White 47 1.7% 14.8% 13.0% 7.1% 45.7% 38.5% 32.6% 45.3% 8.7% 9.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 15 -39.6% -25.8% 66.7% 40.0% 33.3% 46.3% 0.0% 12.8% 0.0% 1.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 17 -33.3% -26.1% 37.5% 30.8% 56.3% 55.6% 6.3% 12.8% 0.0% 0.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 76 -10.7% -7.2% 14.5% 16.4% 56.6% 51.2% 27.6% 29.8% 1.3% 2.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 3 Students Tested: 114
This School:
100.0%State:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
3.5%State:
10.3%
Approaches Standard This School:
9.7%State:
20.3%
Exceeds Standard This School:
59.7%Nevada:
37.5%
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 114 20.9% 3.5% 3.5% 10.3% 9.7% 20.3% 27.2% 31.9% 59.7% 37.5%
Male 60 17.4% 3.8% 5.0% 11.1% 11.7% 19.2% 23.3% 30.7% 60.0% 39.0%
Female 54 24.8% 3.2% 1.9% 9.5% 7.4% 21.5% 31.5% 33.1% 59.3% 36.0%
Asian 13 34.1% 17.9% 0.0% 3.5% 0.0% 12.8% 15.4% 27.6% 84.6% 56.2%
Hispanic 70 24.1% -2.7% 1.4% 12.5% 8.6% 24.3% 32.9% 33.0% 57.1% 30.2%
Black 14 -8.7% -16.7% 14.3% 21.7% 28.6% 29.1% 14.3% 30.6% 42.9% 18.6%
White 12 17.4% 13.5% 8.3% 6.0% 8.3% 14.6% 16.7% 31.5% 66.7% 47.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 52 24.5% -5.4% 1.9% 13.8% 7.7% 25.8% 26.9% 32.0% 63.5% 28.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 82 23.1% -4.6% 2.4% 13.9% 8.5% 24.8% 32.9% 32.6% 56.1% 28.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 125 6.1% 0.4% 8.0% 11.5% 20.0% 22.2% 37.6% 34.9% 34.4% 31.4%
Male 60 9.1% 0.7% 10.0% 11.6% 15.0% 21.7% 36.7% 33.9% 38.3% 32.8%
Female 65 3.3% 0.1% 6.2% 11.3% 24.6% 22.7% 38.5% 35.9% 30.8% 30.0%
Asian 14 19.8% 13.3% 0.0% 5.7% 14.3% 15.1% 21.4% 32.5% 64.3% 46.6%
Hispanic 73 -1.5% -6.3% 11.0% 14.1% 24.7% 26.4% 42.5% 35.7% 21.9% 23.9%
Black 14 -8.8% -17.1% 14.3% 22.8% 28.6% 28.4% 42.9% 30.3% 14.3% 18.4%
White 23 29.8% 9.8% 0.0% 6.9% 4.3% 17.5% 30.4% 35.9% 65.2% 39.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 45 -3.7% -10.5% 8.9% 15.8% 28.9% 28.7% 37.8% 35.5% 24.4% 19.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 77 2.9% -8.4% 11.7% 15.5% 19.5% 26.9% 39.0% 34.5% 29.9% 23.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 139 8.4% 4.2% 2.9% 6.5% 32.4% 33.0% 34.5% 31.3% 30.2% 29.2%
Male 76 9.5% 6.0% 2.6% 6.6% 31.6% 31.0% 38.2% 31.3% 27.6% 31.1%
Female 63 7.2% 2.2% 3.2% 6.4% 33.3% 35.1% 30.2% 31.3% 33.3% 27.2%
Asian 12 18.7% 17.1% 0.0% 3.4% 25.0% 23.2% 33.3% 32.7% 41.7% 40.7%
Hispanic 76 -2.4% -4.0% 3.9% 8.1% 42.1% 39.6% 31.6% 30.3% 22.4% 22.0%
Black 17 8.4% -13.0% 5.9% 12.6% 29.4% 44.1% 35.3% 26.5% 29.4% 16.7%
White 33 28.5% 14.7% 0.0% 3.7% 15.2% 25.3% 39.4% 33.2% 45.5% 37.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 53 2.2% -8.6% 3.8% 9.2% 37.7% 43.1% 35.8% 29.8% 22.6% 17.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 61 -2.2% -5.3% 3.3% 9.2% 42.6% 39.8% 32.8% 29.9% 21.3% 21.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 159 -7.2% 3.6% 7.5% 8.3% 43.4% 31.7% 34.6% 35.6% 14.5% 24.4%
Male 88 -4.0% 4.0% 8.0% 8.6% 39.8% 31.1% 35.2% 34.8% 17.0% 25.4%
Female 71 -11.2% 3.3% 7.0% 8.0% 47.9% 32.4% 33.8% 36.3% 11.3% 23.2%
Asian 21 19.9% 17.3% 4.8% 3.9% 19.0% 22.5% 47.6% 36.4% 28.6% 37.2%
Hispanic 77 -14.7% -5.3% 6.5% 10.4% 51.9% 38.6% 36.4% 34.5% 5.2% 16.5%
Black 24 -14.6% -11.7% 8.3% 16.3% 50.0% 39.1% 33.3% 31.4% 8.3% 13.2%
White 37 -2.2% 13.8% 10.8% 5.0% 35.1% 24.9% 24.3% 37.5% 29.7% 32.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 -56.3% -23.5% 27.3% 25.9% 72.7% 41.3% 0.0% 21.9% 0.0% 11.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 50 -8.3% -9.2% 4.0% 12.0% 48.0% 41.0% 38.0% 33.6% 10.0% 13.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 74 -15.8% -6.7% 4.1% 12.0% 55.4% 38.4% 29.7% 33.6% 10.8% 16.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 131 11.3% 12.4% 3.1% 8.8% 42.3% 35.5% 33.8% 33.7% 20.8% 22.1%
Male 68 14.9% 13.0% 4.5% 9.6% 37.3% 34.2% 26.9% 32.6% 31.3% 23.7%
Female 63 7.5% 11.9% 1.6% 8.0% 47.6% 36.9% 41.3% 34.8% 9.5% 20.3%
Asian 22 20.3% 26.3% 0.0% 3.9% 36.4% 26.5% 36.4% 35.9% 27.3% 33.6%
Hispanic 55 2.2% 3.1% 1.8% 11.3% 52.7% 42.3% 30.9% 31.6% 14.5% 14.8%
Black 16 0.5% -4.2% 12.5% 17.8% 43.8% 43.1% 31.3% 28.3% 12.5% 10.8%
White 37 26.1% 23.4% 2.8% 5.0% 27.8% 28.3% 38.9% 36.8% 30.6% 30.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 40 1.7% -3.5% 2.5% 13.7% 52.5% 46.6% 30.0% 28.4% 15.0% 11.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 55 4.0% 2.2% 5.5% 12.3% 47.3% 42.2% 29.1% 31.2% 18.2% 14.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 130 -2.3% 5.1% 6.2% 10.8% 50.8% 38.7% 29.2% 32.2% 13.8% 18.3%
Male 57 -1.5% 5.6% 5.3% 11.5% 50.9% 37.6% 29.8% 32.0% 14.0% 18.9%
Female 73 -2.9% 4.7% 6.8% 10.1% 50.7% 39.8% 28.8% 32.4% 13.7% 17.7%
Asian 19 23.0% 18.9% 0.0% 5.7% 31.6% 30.0% 42.1% 36.8% 26.3% 27.5%
Hispanic 55 -21.8% -6.7% 7.3% 14.5% 69.1% 46.8% 18.2% 27.8% 5.5% 10.9%
Black 22 4.6% -11.5% 13.6% 20.6% 36.4% 45.5% 40.9% 24.9% 9.1% 9.0%
White 33 12.2% 17.4% 0.0% 6.0% 42.4% 31.2% 33.3% 37.2% 24.2% 25.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 -31.1% -17.8% 0.0% 28.4% 85.7% 44.0% 0.0% 18.9% 14.3% 8.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 28 -27.5% -15.4% 7.1% 18.1% 75.0% 51.9% 14.3% 23.1% 3.6% 6.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 63 -13.7% -7.6% 9.5% 15.7% 58.7% 46.5% 22.2% 27.2% 9.5% 10.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 103 16.7% 5.6% 3.9% 11.8% 34.0% 37.3% 42.7% 28.4% 19.4% 22.6%
Male 44 20.5% 7.5% 4.5% 11.9% 29.5% 35.2% 43.2% 28.2% 22.7% 24.6%
Female 58 13.2% 3.9% 3.4% 11.4% 37.9% 39.3% 41.4% 28.6% 17.2% 20.7%
Asian 21 26.0% 20.6% 4.8% 5.6% 23.8% 28.4% 42.9% 33.3% 28.6% 32.7%
Hispanic 40 9.6% -7.0% 5.0% 16.1% 40.0% 45.5% 32.5% 25.6% 22.5% 12.9%
White 29 23.6% 17.6% 3.4% 6.9% 27.6% 30.1% 51.7% 31.6% 17.2% 31.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 23 6.8% -13.9% 4.3% 19.0% 43.5% 49.5% 30.4% 22.6% 21.7% 8.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 41 13.1% -7.2% 0.0% 16.9% 41.5% 45.0% 34.1% 25.1% 24.4% 13.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 124 16.3% 10.4% 8.9% 12.3% 40.3% 42.7% 29.0% 24.5% 21.8% 20.4%
Male 67 11.8% 11.8% 10.4% 13.1% 43.3% 40.6% 28.4% 24.7% 17.9% 21.6%
Female 57 21.6% 9.1% 7.0% 11.5% 36.8% 44.9% 29.8% 24.3% 26.3% 19.3%
Asian 20 15.5% 22.6% 0.0% 5.9% 50.0% 37.0% 30.0% 27.8% 20.0% 29.3%
Hispanic 39 11.7% -2.9% 10.3% 17.8% 43.6% 50.6% 33.3% 19.9% 12.8% 11.6%
Black 17 -5.1% -7.9% 29.4% 23.6% 41.2% 49.8% 17.6% 17.9% 11.8% 8.7%
White 46 28.5% 22.2% 4.3% 7.0% 32.6% 36.3% 28.3% 28.8% 34.8% 28.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 -7.2% -12.5% 18.2% 30.5% 54.5% 47.5% 9.1% 14.2% 18.2% 7.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 -11.8% -12.4% 13.6% 22.5% 63.6% 55.4% 18.2% 15.8% 4.5% 6.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 37 0.6% -2.6% 16.2% 17.7% 48.6% 50.4% 16.2% 20.2% 18.9% 11.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 4 Students Tested: 122
This School:
100.0%State:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
8.2%State:
7.2%
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective All Students This School:
6.2%State:
3.6%
Male This School:
7.8%Nevada:
3.2%
Asian This School:
18.7%Nevada:
19.4%
Black
This School : 5.5%Nevada : -14.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : 4.0%State : -4.5%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 122 6.2% 3.6% 8.2% 7.2% 19.7% 23.3% 53.3% 55.4% 18.9% 14.1%
Male 57 7.8% 3.2% 8.8% 7.7% 17.5% 23.3% 56.1% 55.0% 17.5% 14.1%
Female 65 4.9% 4.0% 7.7% 6.6% 21.5% 23.4% 50.8% 55.9% 20.0% 14.1%
Asian 13 18.7% 19.4% 0.0% 2.5% 15.4% 12.3% 46.2% 56.8% 38.5% 28.5%
Hispanic 71 -1.1% -3.0% 9.9% 8.8% 25.4% 28.2% 52.1% 53.9% 12.7% 9.0%
Black 14 5.5% -14.3% 21.4% 15.6% 7.1% 32.8% 71.4% 46.4% 0.0% 5.2%
White 18 17.4% 12.5% 0.0% 4.2% 16.7% 17.5% 50.0% 58.9% 33.3% 19.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 52 -2.4% -5.3% 9.6% 9.8% 26.9% 29.6% 46.2% 52.1% 17.3% 8.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 83 4.0% -4.5% 8.4% 9.9% 21.7% 28.7% 56.6% 52.8% 13.3% 8.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 148 2.3% 0.5% 4.7% 8.0% 27.0% 25.6% 60.1% 57.5% 8.1% 8.9%
Male 74 -1.0% -0.3% 5.4% 8.5% 29.7% 25.9% 55.4% 56.2% 9.5% 9.5%
Female 74 5.7% 1.3% 4.1% 7.5% 24.3% 25.2% 64.9% 58.9% 6.8% 8.4%
Asian 14 19.8% 13.0% 0.0% 4.0% 14.3% 17.1% 64.3% 62.1% 21.4% 16.8%
Hispanic 80 -3.4% -6.8% 6.3% 9.6% 31.3% 31.3% 57.5% 53.9% 5.0% 5.2%
Black 18 -4.8% -15.8% 5.6% 16.0% 33.3% 33.9% 55.6% 47.1% 5.6% 3.0%
White 35 11.2% 9.8% 2.9% 5.0% 20.0% 19.3% 65.7% 62.9% 11.4% 12.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 42 -8.8% -17.1% 4.8% 13.1% 38.1% 38.2% 52.4% 46.5% 4.8% 2.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 84 -4.0% -9.1% 8.3% 11.4% 29.8% 31.9% 57.1% 51.8% 4.8% 5.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 155 15.3% 8.0% 6.5% 8.1% 21.9% 27.6% 40.0% 32.4% 31.6% 31.9%
Male 90 15.9% 7.6% 5.6% 8.4% 22.2% 27.7% 38.9% 32.1% 33.3% 31.8%
Female 65 14.5% 8.3% 7.7% 7.8% 21.5% 27.6% 41.5% 32.7% 29.2% 32.0%
Asian 28 22.3% 23.2% 3.6% 3.4% 17.9% 17.1% 39.3% 32.2% 39.3% 47.3%
Hispanic 81 11.6% 0.0% 8.6% 10.3% 23.5% 33.4% 48.1% 32.4% 19.8% 23.9%
Black 15 -3.0% -7.3% 6.7% 15.1% 40.0% 35.9% 40.0% 30.6% 13.3% 18.4%
White 31 27.6% 17.0% 3.2% 4.9% 12.9% 21.8% 19.4% 32.9% 64.5% 40.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 39 2.7% -9.5% 7.7% 13.9% 33.3% 39.3% 48.7% 30.4% 10.3% 16.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 70 8.0% -1.7% 10.0% 11.4% 25.7% 34.0% 41.4% 31.7% 22.9% 22.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 134 4.1% 9.9% 8.2% 9.3% 31.3% 24.5% 41.0% 38.7% 19.4% 27.4%
Male 69 6.0% 9.5% 11.6% 10.2% 26.1% 24.0% 36.2% 38.1% 26.1% 27.7%
Female 65 2.2% 10.3% 4.6% 8.4% 36.9% 25.1% 46.2% 39.4% 12.3% 27.2%
Asian 20 13.7% 23.2% 5.0% 3.9% 25.0% 16.6% 40.0% 36.7% 30.0% 42.8%
Hispanic 60 2.0% 2.1% 5.0% 11.8% 36.7% 29.8% 43.3% 38.8% 15.0% 19.6%
Black 17 -15.1% -5.9% 29.4% 17.7% 29.4% 31.9% 17.6% 35.2% 23.5% 15.2%
White 36 10.4% 19.0% 5.6% 5.7% 27.8% 19.0% 47.2% 39.8% 19.4% 35.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 37 -4.9% -7.4% 2.7% 15.4% 45.9% 35.7% 45.9% 36.2% 5.4% 12.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 68 1.1% -0.1% 11.8% 13.3% 30.9% 30.5% 39.7% 37.5% 17.6% 18.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 145 21.5% 21.0% 9.7% 9.9% 25.5% 25.8% 41.4% 35.6% 23.4% 28.7%
Male 63 21.8% 20.3% 14.3% 10.8% 20.6% 25.6% 46.0% 34.6% 19.0% 29.0%
Female 82 21.3% 21.8% 6.1% 8.9% 29.3% 26.0% 37.8% 36.7% 26.8% 28.4%
Asian 21 51.9% 34.9% 4.8% 4.7% 0.0% 17.1% 71.4% 34.8% 23.8% 43.4%
Hispanic 65 7.5% 11.5% 13.8% 13.4% 35.4% 31.8% 32.3% 35.0% 18.5% 19.7%
Black 24 6.7% 4.6% 16.7% 18.6% 33.3% 33.5% 37.5% 31.8% 12.5% 16.1%
White 34 39.1% 31.5% 0.0% 5.3% 17.6% 19.8% 44.1% 37.3% 38.2% 37.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 -4.4% -8.5% 16.7% 29.9% 44.4% 35.3% 22.2% 23.3% 16.7% 11.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 31 8.3% -1.2% 9.7% 18.9% 38.7% 38.9% 35.5% 30.7% 16.1% 11.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 59 19.4% 10.4% 15.3% 14.5% 22.0% 31.8% 40.7% 34.8% 22.0% 18.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 5 Students Tested: 155
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Meets Standard This School:
76.8%Nevada:
64.0%
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective All Students This School:
14.1%Nevada:
3.3%
Male This School:
12.9%Nevada:
1.9%
Hispanic
This School : 9.1%State : -2.0%
White This School:
23.4%Nevada:
11.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : 10.9%State : -4.5%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 155 14.1% 3.3% 6.5% 16.4% 13.6% 14.5% 76.8% 64.0% 3.2% 5.2%
Male 80 12.9% 1.9% 6.3% 17.3% 15.0% 14.9% 75.0% 62.4% 3.8% 5.4%
Female 75 15.4% 4.8% 6.7% 15.3% 12.0% 14.0% 78.7% 65.8% 2.7% 4.8%
Asian 14 34.1% 19.0% 0.0% 6.4% 0.0% 8.7% 92.9% 73.1% 7.1% 11.8%
Hispanic 88 9.1% -2.0% 9.1% 19.5% 15.9% 16.5% 73.9% 60.5% 1.1% 3.5%
Black 19 2.5% -15.6% 5.3% 31.1% 26.3% 18.7% 68.4% 48.9% 0.0% 1.4%
White 28 23.4% 11.0% 3.6% 10.7% 7.1% 12.3% 82.1% 70.0% 7.1% 6.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 68 7.6% -4.4% 8.8% 21.7% 17.7% 16.8% 70.6% 58.1% 2.9% 3.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 99 10.9% -4.5% 8.1% 21.7% 15.2% 16.9% 73.7% 58.3% 3.0% 3.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 147 10.3% 0.6% 8.8% 16.2% 15.0% 17.3% 63.9% 60.4% 12.2% 6.1%
Male 88 13.6% -0.6% 11.4% 17.3% 9.1% 17.4% 63.6% 59.0% 15.9% 6.3%
Female 59 5.3% 1.8% 5.1% 15.0% 23.7% 17.2% 64.4% 61.8% 6.8% 5.9%
Asian 22 20.5% 14.4% 4.5% 8.0% 9.1% 11.7% 68.2% 67.9% 18.2% 12.4%
Hispanic 80 10.4% -6.2% 8.8% 19.9% 15.0% 20.5% 70.0% 56.3% 6.3% 3.4%
Black 14 -23.0% -15.8% 21.4% 27.9% 35.7% 22.1% 35.7% 47.5% 7.1% 2.6%
White 31 18.0% 9.3% 6.5% 10.8% 9.7% 14.0% 58.1% 66.7% 25.8% 8.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 25 -5.9% -22.7% 20.0% 31.1% 20.0% 25.7% 60.0% 42.1% 0.0% 1.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 88 4.6% -8.5% 10.2% 21.7% 19.3% 20.9% 62.5% 54.0% 8.0% 3.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 134 6.4% 5.9% 3.7% 4.0% 33.6% 33.8% 45.5% 45.7% 17.2% 16.5%
Male 68 4.0% 4.7% 5.9% 4.8% 33.8% 34.2% 38.2% 44.8% 22.1% 16.3%
Female 66 8.9% 7.1% 1.5% 3.3% 33.3% 33.3% 53.0% 46.6% 12.1% 16.8%
Asian 23 26.3% 19.8% 4.3% 1.7% 13.0% 22.3% 43.5% 47.8% 39.1% 28.2%
Hispanic 63 -2.3% -2.7% 3.2% 5.3% 42.9% 41.1% 44.4% 42.4% 9.5% 11.2%
Black 15 -16.3% -10.7% 6.7% 8.5% 53.3% 45.9% 33.3% 38.0% 6.7% 7.6%
White 32 18.7% 16.0% 3.1% 2.1% 21.9% 25.5% 53.1% 50.4% 21.9% 21.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 -25.5% -20.5% 0.0% 8.5% 69.2% 55.7% 26.9% 31.7% 3.8% 4.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 69 1.7% -4.5% 5.8% 5.8% 36.2% 42.5% 46.4% 41.2% 11.6% 10.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 148 -1.6% 5.3% 6.8% 5.9% 38.5% 32.5% 46.6% 48.4% 8.1% 13.2%
Male 68 -4.8% 4.4% 7.4% 6.6% 41.2% 32.6% 44.1% 47.6% 7.4% 13.1%
Female 80 1.2% 6.2% 6.3% 5.1% 36.3% 32.5% 48.8% 49.3% 8.8% 13.2%
Asian 21 19.9% 19.0% 4.8% 2.6% 19.0% 22.2% 66.7% 51.8% 9.5% 23.4%
Hispanic 64 -9.4% -3.9% 4.7% 7.7% 48.4% 39.9% 40.6% 44.3% 6.3% 8.2%
Black 30 -16.3% -12.0% 10.0% 11.2% 50.0% 44.5% 36.7% 38.5% 3.3% 5.8%
White 32 15.6% 15.5% 6.3% 3.5% 21.9% 24.7% 56.3% 54.1% 15.6% 17.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 15 -36.3% -30.4% 33.3% 23.7% 46.7% 50.4% 13.3% 22.5% 6.7% 3.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 31 -24.0% -18.9% 12.9% 12.2% 54.8% 50.4% 32.3% 33.9% 0.0% 3.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 74 -9.0% -5.1% 9.5% 8.5% 43.2% 40.3% 44.6% 43.5% 2.7% 7.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 131 -1.3% 15.1% 12.2% 6.7% 45.8% 34.8% 37.4% 46.9% 4.6% 11.6%
Male 59 -6.0% 14.1% 11.9% 7.9% 50.8% 34.8% 30.5% 45.9% 6.8% 11.5%
Female 72 2.5% 16.3% 12.5% 5.5% 41.7% 34.9% 43.1% 47.9% 2.8% 11.7%
Asian 19 19.9% 29.6% 0.0% 3.4% 36.8% 23.7% 52.6% 53.0% 10.5% 19.9%
Hispanic 61 -8.9% 4.8% 14.8% 9.0% 50.8% 42.9% 32.8% 41.4% 1.6% 6.7%
Black 16 -12.0% -3.2% 31.3% 13.3% 37.5% 46.6% 31.3% 35.2% 0.0% 4.8%
White 33 8.2% 26.5% 6.1% 3.7% 42.4% 26.6% 42.4% 53.6% 9.1% 16.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 10 -43.3% -19.8% 50.0% 24.8% 50.0% 51.8% 0.0% 20.8% 0.0% 2.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 -31.8% -15.8% 23.1% 16.3% 65.4% 56.2% 11.5% 25.7% 0.0% 1.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 47 1.4% 3.3% 12.8% 9.8% 42.6% 43.6% 38.3% 40.4% 6.4% 6.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 175 0.9% 9.3% 10.9% 8.2% 42.9% 37.2% 41.7% 41.5% 4.6% 13.2%
Male 94 -3.9% 7.9% 13.8% 9.2% 44.7% 37.6% 38.3% 40.9% 3.2% 12.4%
Female 81 6.5% 10.7% 7.4% 7.2% 40.7% 36.7% 45.7% 42.0% 6.2% 14.1%
Asian 22 9.1% 24.4% 0.0% 3.5% 45.5% 26.7% 45.5% 47.2% 9.1% 22.6%
Hispanic 71 -4.6% -2.0% 14.1% 10.6% 45.1% 46.0% 39.4% 36.1% 1.4% 7.3%
Black 29 -14.4% -9.6% 24.1% 16.4% 44.8% 47.7% 31.0% 30.5% 0.0% 5.3%
White 51 15.4% 20.8% 3.9% 5.0% 35.3% 28.9% 51.0% 47.7% 9.8% 18.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 16 -45.4% -24.6% 50.0% 29.6% 50.0% 49.6% 0.0% 18.1% 0.0% 2.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -25.4% -22.2% 25.0% 18.9% 55.0% 58.0% 20.0% 21.0% 0.0% 2.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 83 -12.9% -4.3% 16.9% 12.2% 50.6% 46.7% 30.1% 34.5% 2.4% 6.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 119 9.7% 5.1% 12.7% 9.2% 32.2% 40.3% 38.1% 38.1% 16.9% 12.4%
Male 60 5.4% 3.8% 15.3% 10.8% 33.9% 40.0% 35.6% 37.1% 15.3% 12.1%
Female 57 14.2% 6.7% 10.5% 7.5% 29.8% 40.4% 40.4% 39.3% 19.3% 12.7%
Asian 22 27.3% 21.6% 4.5% 3.8% 22.7% 29.2% 50.0% 46.5% 22.7% 20.5%
Hispanic 35 -5.4% -8.3% 11.4% 12.6% 48.6% 50.4% 31.4% 31.2% 8.6% 5.9%
Black 13 -28.7% -13.2% 16.7% 17.4% 66.7% 50.5% 16.7% 27.6% 0.0% 4.6%
White 46 22.0% 17.5% 17.4% 5.5% 15.2% 31.7% 41.3% 44.7% 26.1% 18.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 12 -9.0% -27.4% 27.3% 32.2% 36.4% 49.7% 27.3% 15.2% 9.1% 2.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 19 -19.1% -23.4% 21.1% 18.5% 52.6% 59.4% 21.1% 19.8% 5.3% 2.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 42 -3.9% -8.8% 14.6% 13.6% 43.9% 49.8% 31.7% 30.6% 9.8% 6.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 134 11.8% 15.2% 10.4% 8.4% 43.3% 41.9% 34.3% 39.7% 11.9% 10.0%
Male 72 5.8% 13.3% 9.7% 9.7% 50.0% 42.4% 26.4% 37.6% 13.9% 10.2%
Female 62 18.7% 17.3% 11.3% 6.8% 35.5% 41.4% 43.5% 41.9% 9.7% 9.9%
Asian 23 9.0% 29.7% 8.7% 4.3% 47.8% 31.6% 34.8% 47.2% 8.7% 17.0%
Hispanic 35 5.5% 2.5% 5.7% 11.2% 54.3% 51.8% 28.6% 32.5% 11.4% 4.5%
Black 22 -2.7% -3.6% 27.3% 16.1% 40.9% 52.9% 27.3% 27.5% 4.5% 3.4%
White 54 22.9% 26.1% 7.4% 5.2% 35.2% 34.2% 40.7% 46.3% 16.7% 14.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 10 -4.5% -18.0% 30.0% 31.4% 40.0% 52.1% 20.0% 14.1% 10.0% 2.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 17 -16.9% -9.9% 11.8% 16.1% 70.6% 59.3% 17.6% 22.9% 0.0% 1.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 4.0% 2.2% 12.8% 12.4% 48.7% 50.9% 30.8% 32.2% 7.7% 4.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 3 Students Tested: 114
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School:
100.0%State:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
8.8%State:
21.5%
Approaches Standard This School:
22.8%Nevada:
20.2%
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 114 4.6% -5.5% 8.8% 21.5% 22.8% 20.2% 42.1% 32.6% 26.3% 25.7%
Male 60 4.5% -8.6% 8.3% 24.2% 23.3% 20.6% 43.3% 31.8% 25.0% 23.4%
Female 54 4.7% -2.3% 9.3% 18.7% 22.2% 19.8% 40.7% 33.5% 27.8% 28.0%
Asian 13 36.2% 10.7% 0.0% 10.4% 0.0% 15.1% 53.9% 33.9% 46.2% 40.6%
Hispanic 70 -2.4% -16.6% 7.1% 28.9% 31.4% 23.9% 37.1% 30.8% 24.3% 16.4%
Black 14 0.5% -22.0% 21.4% 33.7% 14.3% 24.4% 28.6% 28.5% 35.7% 13.4%
White 12 2.9% 7.9% 16.7% 12.6% 16.7% 15.7% 66.7% 35.2% 0.0% 36.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 52 -4.2% -22.3% 7.7% 33.5% 32.7% 25.0% 42.3% 29.0% 17.3% 12.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 82 2.1% -16.9% 8.5% 29.2% 25.6% 23.8% 36.6% 30.8% 29.3% 16.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 125 -1.4% -3.0% 1.6% 3.4% 36.0% 35.8% 38.4% 34.7% 24.0% 26.1%
Male 60 -3.8% -6.5% 1.7% 4.0% 38.3% 38.7% 38.3% 33.3% 21.7% 24.0%
Female 65 0.8% 0.7% 1.5% 2.8% 33.8% 32.7% 38.5% 36.1% 26.2% 28.4%
Asian 14 29.1% 11.4% 0.0% 1.3% 7.1% 23.5% 35.7% 37.2% 57.1% 37.9%
Hispanic 73 -10.4% -13.9% 2.7% 4.6% 43.8% 45.5% 43.8% 33.8% 9.6% 16.1%
Black 14 -20.9% -16.9% 0.0% 5.7% 57.1% 47.4% 28.6% 30.6% 14.3% 16.3%
White 23 18.8% 9.2% 0.0% 1.9% 17.4% 25.1% 30.4% 36.2% 52.2% 36.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 45 -17.1% -22.2% 4.4% 5.5% 48.9% 52.8% 42.2% 31.5% 4.4% 10.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 77 -2.8% -14.1% 1.3% 4.9% 37.7% 45.4% 45.5% 33.1% 15.6% 16.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 139 13.8% 8.3% 1.4% 4.4% 33.1% 35.5% 37.4% 37.2% 28.1% 22.9%
Male 76 6.2% 4.7% 2.6% 5.6% 39.5% 38.0% 35.5% 35.5% 22.4% 20.9%
Female 63 22.9% 12.2% 0.0% 3.2% 25.4% 32.8% 39.7% 38.9% 34.9% 25.0%
Asian 12 23.3% 18.5% 0.0% 2.2% 25.0% 27.6% 25.0% 39.8% 50.0% 30.4%
Hispanic 76 4.9% -3.3% 1.3% 6.3% 42.1% 45.3% 35.5% 34.7% 21.1% 13.7%
Black 17 7.1% -5.6% 5.9% 6.7% 35.3% 47.1% 23.5% 32.9% 35.3% 13.2%
White 33 33.1% 21.6% 0.0% 2.4% 15.2% 24.3% 54.5% 40.2% 30.3% 33.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 53 4.9% -11.9% 1.9% 7.8% 41.5% 52.5% 34.0% 32.3% 22.6% 7.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 61 2.4% -3.8% 1.6% 6.5% 44.3% 45.6% 34.4% 34.6% 19.7% 13.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 159 4.3% 6.9% 3.1% 6.1% 40.9% 35.3% 37.7% 33.5% 18.2% 25.1%
Male 88 1.7% 3.2% 0.0% 7.1% 46.6% 38.0% 34.1% 32.4% 19.3% 22.5%
Female 71 7.5% 10.8% 7.0% 5.1% 33.8% 32.5% 42.3% 34.7% 16.9% 27.7%
Asian 21 24.5% 20.2% 0.0% 3.1% 23.8% 25.0% 42.9% 36.5% 33.3% 35.4%
Hispanic 77 -4.9% -5.6% 6.5% 8.9% 46.8% 45.0% 33.8% 31.2% 13.0% 15.0%
Black 24 -10.0% -5.4% 0.0% 8.3% 58.3% 45.4% 41.7% 30.9% 0.0% 15.4%
White 37 21.3% 19.8% 0.0% 3.5% 27.0% 25.0% 40.5% 36.0% 32.4% 35.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 -33.5% -25.4% 0.0% 23.2% 81.8% 50.5% 18.2% 16.4% 0.0% 10.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 50 -7.7% -14.3% 10.0% 11.2% 46.0% 51.4% 30.0% 28.6% 14.0% 8.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 74 -9.8% -5.8% 4.1% 9.0% 54.1% 45.2% 27.0% 31.0% 14.9% 14.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 131 25.8% 19.7% 3.1% 7.0% 31.5% 33.7% 49.2% 43.1% 16.2% 16.2%
Male 68 23.1% 15.5% 4.5% 8.6% 32.8% 36.3% 44.8% 40.6% 17.9% 14.5%
Female 63 28.7% 24.1% 1.6% 5.4% 30.2% 30.9% 54.0% 45.7% 14.3% 18.0%
Asian 22 33.1% 32.7% 0.0% 2.8% 27.3% 24.9% 63.6% 49.8% 9.1% 22.5%
Hispanic 55 13.1% 7.4% 3.6% 10.2% 43.6% 42.9% 36.4% 38.6% 16.4% 8.4%
Black 16 22.9% 6.8% 12.5% 10.5% 25.0% 43.1% 43.8% 36.3% 18.8% 10.2%
White 37 41.0% 32.6% 0.0% 3.9% 19.4% 24.0% 61.1% 47.9% 19.4% 24.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 40 5.4% -3.6% 5.0% 13.4% 50.0% 50.6% 40.0% 31.9% 5.0% 4.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 55 16.8% 6.5% 3.6% 10.5% 40.0% 43.4% 40.0% 37.6% 16.4% 8.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 130 8.9% 11.3% 10.0% 10.7% 41.5% 38.4% 27.7% 29.5% 20.8% 21.4%
Male 57 4.3% 7.5% 10.5% 12.6% 45.6% 40.3% 29.8% 27.4% 14.0% 19.7%
Female 73 12.5% 15.2% 9.6% 8.8% 38.4% 36.4% 26.0% 31.7% 26.0% 23.1%
Asian 19 18.3% 24.7% 0.0% 5.4% 42.1% 30.3% 15.8% 35.0% 42.1% 29.3%
Hispanic 55 -1.4% -3.3% 14.5% 16.4% 47.3% 47.2% 27.3% 25.1% 10.9% 11.3%
Black 22 10.4% -2.3% 13.6% 15.1% 36.4% 47.6% 36.4% 25.0% 13.6% 12.3%
White 33 21.0% 25.1% 6.1% 5.7% 33.3% 29.6% 30.3% 33.5% 30.3% 31.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 -18.2% -17.1% 28.6% 32.2% 50.0% 45.3% 21.4% 14.5% 0.0% 8.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 28 -21.7% -15.3% 14.3% 21.4% 67.9% 54.2% 10.7% 19.1% 7.1% 5.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 63 6.4% -3.2% 14.3% 16.2% 39.7% 47.4% 30.2% 25.1% 15.9% 11.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 103 1.2% 4.8% 3.9% 12.3% 55.3% 43.2% 32.0% 29.9% 8.7% 14.6%
Male 44 -1.0% 1.8% 4.5% 14.2% 56.8% 44.4% 31.8% 28.2% 6.8% 13.3%
Female 58 3.5% 8.2% 3.4% 10.3% 53.4% 41.9% 32.8% 31.8% 10.3% 16.1%
Asian 21 17.5% 17.7% 0.0% 5.5% 42.9% 37.1% 42.9% 36.3% 14.3% 21.1%
Hispanic 40 -7.1% -12.2% 2.5% 19.5% 65.0% 53.1% 30.0% 21.7% 2.5% 5.7%
White 29 12.1% 19.4% 0.0% 6.3% 48.3% 34.7% 34.5% 36.7% 17.2% 22.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 23 -17.9% -22.1% 4.3% 24.8% 73.9% 57.7% 21.7% 14.9% 0.0% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 41 -0.6% -10.0% 2.4% 18.7% 58.5% 51.8% 34.1% 23.1% 4.9% 6.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 124 16.0% 17.2% 10.5% 10.7% 46.0% 44.6% 29.0% 28.0% 14.5% 16.8%
Male 67 6.8% 13.6% 14.9% 12.6% 50.7% 46.2% 25.4% 26.5% 9.0% 14.7%
Female 57 26.9% 20.9% 5.3% 8.6% 40.4% 43.0% 33.3% 29.5% 21.1% 18.9%
Asian 20 7.5% 27.7% 0.0% 4.7% 65.0% 40.1% 25.0% 33.5% 10.0% 21.8%
Hispanic 39 11.0% -1.2% 10.3% 18.0% 51.3% 55.7% 28.2% 19.9% 10.3% 6.4%
Black 17 -4.0% 3.1% 29.4% 15.4% 47.1% 54.0% 17.6% 23.4% 5.9% 7.3%
White 46 29.0% 31.7% 8.7% 5.4% 34.8% 35.4% 32.6% 33.7% 23.9% 25.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 -9.3% -8.8% 27.3% 30.3% 54.5% 51.1% 18.2% 13.3% 0.0% 5.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 -9.3% -13.9% 13.6% 24.3% 68.2% 62.1% 18.2% 11.6% 0.0% 2.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 37 7.6% 1.3% 21.6% 16.1% 43.2% 55.1% 29.7% 21.2% 5.4% 7.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 4
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
12.3%State:
15.9%
Meets Standard This School:
48.4%Nevada:
46.3%
Exceeds Standard This School:
18.0%State:
18.5%
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : 0.5%Nevada : -1.1%
Hispanic
This School : -13.8%State : -10.8%
Black
This School : -1.6%State : -18.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : -15.9%Nevada : -16.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : -6.9%Nevada : -11.4%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 122 0.5% -1.1% 12.3% 15.9% 21.3% 19.3% 48.4% 46.3% 18.0% 18.5%
Male 57 2.5% -5.4% 12.3% 19.0% 19.3% 20.5% 56.1% 44.7% 12.3% 15.9%
Female 65 -1.3% 3.4% 12.3% 12.7% 23.1% 18.0% 41.5% 48.0% 23.1% 21.3%
Asian 13 26.4% 13.5% 0.0% 7.4% 7.7% 13.2% 61.5% 52.0% 30.8% 27.4%
Hispanic 71 -13.8% -10.8% 16.9% 21.5% 31.0% 23.4% 40.9% 43.4% 11.3% 11.7%
Black 14 -1.6% -18.2% 14.3% 26.0% 21.4% 26.3% 64.3% 38.5% 0.0% 9.2%
White 18 28.6% 10.9% 5.6% 9.1% 0.0% 14.1% 55.6% 50.0% 38.9% 26.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 52 -15.9% -16.6% 19.2% 25.4% 30.8% 25.3% 36.5% 40.0% 13.5% 9.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 83 -6.9% -11.4% 13.3% 21.7% 27.7% 23.8% 48.2% 43.1% 10.8% 11.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 148 -1.0% -0.8% 4.1% 7.4% 31.1% 27.5% 36.5% 41.6% 28.4% 23.5%
Male 74 -9.1% -4.2% 2.7% 9.3% 40.5% 29.1% 39.2% 41.0% 17.6% 20.6%
Female 74 7.1% 2.8% 5.4% 5.4% 21.6% 25.8% 33.8% 42.1% 39.2% 26.6%
Asian 14 27.0% 9.1% 0.0% 3.4% 7.1% 21.6% 42.9% 43.8% 50.0% 31.2%
Hispanic 80 -10.9% -11.7% 5.0% 10.1% 40.0% 35.6% 33.8% 39.4% 21.3% 14.9%
Black 18 -10.3% -14.0% 5.6% 12.6% 38.9% 35.5% 27.8% 38.5% 27.8% 13.4%
White 35 14.1% 11.4% 2.9% 4.2% 17.1% 18.5% 42.9% 43.9% 37.1% 33.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 42 -34.9% -27.9% 7.1% 14.5% 61.9% 47.4% 21.4% 33.1% 9.5% 5.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 84 -9.9% -11.7% 4.8% 10.7% 39.3% 35.1% 34.5% 39.6% 21.4% 14.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 155 8.9% 5.8% 5.8% 9.1% 29.0% 28.9% 43.9% 46.2% 21.3% 15.8%
Male 90 9.3% 1.8% 4.4% 11.1% 30.0% 30.7% 43.3% 44.6% 22.2% 13.6%
Female 65 8.3% 9.9% 7.7% 6.9% 27.7% 26.9% 44.6% 48.0% 20.0% 18.2%
Asian 28 22.3% 16.1% 0.0% 4.2% 21.4% 23.4% 46.4% 48.1% 32.1% 24.3%
Hispanic 81 -0.7% -6.3% 9.9% 12.6% 34.6% 37.3% 43.2% 41.4% 12.3% 8.7%
Black 15 -9.6% -7.0% 6.7% 13.6% 46.7% 37.1% 40.0% 41.1% 6.7% 8.2%
White 31 30.8% 18.8% 0.0% 5.4% 12.9% 19.4% 45.2% 52.0% 41.9% 23.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 39 -15.3% -22.7% 12.8% 18.2% 46.2% 48.2% 41.0% 31.2% 0.0% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 70 -4.9% -6.1% 10.0% 13.0% 38.6% 36.8% 40.0% 41.3% 11.4% 8.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 134 -1.1% 0.8% 11.9% 11.7% 32.8% 31.2% 44.8% 41.7% 10.4% 15.4%
Male 69 -4.1% -3.8% 15.9% 14.4% 31.9% 33.1% 42.0% 39.0% 10.1% 13.5%
Female 65 2.2% 5.7% 7.7% 8.8% 33.8% 29.2% 47.7% 44.6% 10.8% 17.4%
Asian 20 8.7% 13.9% 5.0% 5.9% 30.0% 24.0% 55.0% 46.7% 10.0% 23.5%
Hispanic 60 -9.6% -10.9% 13.3% 15.7% 40.0% 38.9% 38.3% 37.4% 8.3% 8.0%
Black 17 -3.4% -12.3% 17.6% 18.3% 29.4% 37.6% 41.2% 35.2% 11.8% 8.9%
White 36 7.6% 13.0% 11.1% 7.1% 25.0% 23.5% 50.0% 46.6% 13.9% 22.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 37 -26.6% -26.3% 18.9% 22.6% 51.4% 47.5% 29.7% 27.2% 0.0% 2.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 68 -10.7% -11.8% 19.1% 17.1% 35.3% 38.4% 39.7% 36.7% 5.9% 7.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 145 11.2% 14.5% 15.9% 13.0% 29.7% 29.2% 43.4% 41.5% 11.0% 16.3%
Male 63 7.5% 9.4% 25.4% 16.1% 23.8% 31.1% 46.0% 38.3% 4.8% 14.5%
Female 82 14.0% 19.9% 8.5% 9.7% 34.1% 27.1% 41.5% 44.9% 15.9% 18.2%
Asian 21 18.6% 26.5% 9.5% 6.7% 28.6% 23.5% 52.4% 48.4% 9.5% 21.4%
Hispanic 65 -3.3% 0.9% 21.5% 18.6% 38.5% 37.2% 36.9% 36.6% 3.1% 7.6%
Black 24 2.5% 1.2% 25.0% 19.7% 29.2% 35.8% 33.3% 34.6% 12.5% 9.9%
White 34 39.1% 28.0% 2.9% 7.4% 14.7% 21.2% 55.9% 46.4% 26.5% 24.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 -15.5% -18.7% 44.4% 41.4% 27.8% 34.0% 22.2% 19.3% 5.6% 5.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 31 -14.3% -18.4% 25.8% 27.7% 45.2% 47.4% 25.8% 23.6% 3.2% 1.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 59 4.2% 0.6% 22.0% 19.2% 30.5% 36.9% 40.7% 36.2% 6.8% 7.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 5 Students Tested: 155
This School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
14.2%Nevada:
17.2%
Approaches Standard This School:
21.3%State:
20.1%
Meets Standard This School:
41.9%State:
38.9%
Exceeds Standard This School:
22.6%State:
23.8%
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 155 -1.4% -3.2% 14.2% 17.2% 21.3% 20.1% 41.9% 38.9% 22.6% 23.8%
Male 80 -5.9% -7.4% 16.3% 20.7% 23.8% 20.7% 43.8% 37.3% 16.3% 21.2%
Female 75 3.4% 1.2% 12.0% 13.5% 18.7% 19.4% 40.0% 40.5% 29.3% 26.6%
Asian 14 19.8% 8.9% 0.0% 9.6% 14.3% 15.6% 28.6% 42.5% 57.1% 32.3%
Hispanic 88 -13.6% -13.3% 22.7% 22.8% 25.0% 24.6% 38.6% 37.2% 13.6% 15.5%
Black 19 -8.0% -20.3% 10.5% 28.2% 31.6% 26.2% 47.4% 33.3% 10.5% 12.3%
White 28 23.4% 9.3% 0.0% 10.1% 10.7% 14.7% 57.1% 41.1% 32.1% 34.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 68 -17.4% -19.8% 23.5% 27.4% 27.9% 26.5% 30.9% 34.7% 17.7% 11.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 99 -8.3% -14.0% 18.2% 23.4% 24.2% 24.7% 41.4% 37.1% 16.2% 14.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 147 -8.1% -12.3% 3.4% 8.2% 38.8% 38.2% 44.9% 44.1% 12.9% 9.4%
Male 88 -7.9% -14.8% 2.3% 9.9% 39.8% 38.9% 43.2% 42.9% 14.8% 8.2%
Female 59 -8.3% -9.8% 5.1% 6.4% 37.3% 37.5% 47.5% 45.4% 10.2% 10.7%
Asian 22 6.8% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 27.3% 30.3% 59.1% 49.6% 13.6% 16.3%
Hispanic 80 -15.9% -25.1% 5.0% 11.3% 45.0% 47.8% 43.8% 36.1% 6.3% 4.8%
Black 14 -37.3% -27.0% 7.1% 13.1% 64.3% 48.0% 21.4% 34.3% 7.1% 4.6%
White 31 14.7% 1.6% 0.0% 4.8% 19.4% 27.7% 48.4% 53.6% 32.3% 14.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 25 -49.9% -49.2% 16.0% 21.2% 68.0% 62.1% 16.0% 16.2% 0.0% 0.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 88 -17.0% -24.7% 5.7% 11.8% 45.5% 46.9% 42.0% 36.4% 6.8% 4.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 134 -3.3% -4.4% 4.5% 8.6% 42.5% 39.4% 43.3% 43.4% 9.7% 8.5%
Male 68 -7.8% -7.9% 7.4% 10.8% 44.1% 40.8% 38.2% 41.2% 10.3% 7.2%
Female 66 1.3% -0.7% 1.5% 6.4% 40.9% 38.0% 48.5% 45.7% 9.1% 9.9%
Asian 23 8.9% 8.1% 4.3% 4.4% 30.4% 31.2% 43.5% 50.3% 21.7% 14.2%
Hispanic 63 -11.9% -16.2% 7.9% 11.8% 47.6% 48.1% 38.1% 35.4% 6.3% 4.7%
Black 15 -16.3% -18.9% 0.0% 15.2% 60.0% 47.4% 40.0% 33.0% 0.0% 4.4%
White 32 9.3% 8.5% 0.0% 4.7% 34.4% 30.5% 53.1% 52.5% 12.5% 12.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 -40.9% -39.1% 11.5% 20.9% 73.1% 61.8% 15.4% 16.7% 0.0% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 69 -14.3% -17.1% 5.8% 12.4% 52.2% 48.4% 34.8% 34.9% 7.2% 4.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 148 -17.8% -9.7% 11.5% 11.5% 50.0% 41.8% 31.8% 39.0% 6.8% 7.6%
Male 68 -21.0% -14.4% 17.6% 14.2% 47.1% 43.8% 32.4% 36.2% 2.9% 5.7%
Female 80 -15.1% -4.8% 6.3% 8.7% 52.5% 39.8% 31.3% 41.9% 10.0% 9.6%
Asian 21 0.8% 1.5% 9.5% 6.3% 33.3% 35.9% 47.6% 46.5% 9.5% 11.3%
Hispanic 64 -31.3% -23.5% 14.1% 16.9% 60.9% 50.3% 23.4% 29.4% 1.6% 3.4%
Black 30 -23.0% -22.6% 13.3% 16.6% 53.3% 49.7% 33.3% 29.6% 0.0% 4.1%
White 32 3.1% 4.1% 6.3% 6.5% 34.4% 33.1% 37.5% 48.7% 21.9% 11.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 15 -43.0% -42.8% 46.7% 45.4% 40.0% 41.2% 6.7% 11.8% 6.7% 1.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 31 -46.6% -44.2% 22.6% 29.3% 67.7% 58.6% 9.7% 11.5% 0.0% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 74 -25.2% -23.3% 14.9% 17.1% 54.1% 49.9% 28.4% 29.6% 2.7% 3.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 131 -9.7% 8.2% 15.3% 9.5% 51.1% 39.0% 32.1% 44.7% 1.5% 6.8%
Male 59 -11.1% 4.1% 16.9% 11.7% 50.8% 40.9% 32.2% 42.5% 0.0% 4.9%
Female 72 -8.6% 12.6% 13.9% 7.1% 51.4% 37.1% 31.9% 47.0% 2.8% 8.8%
Asian 19 4.1% 18.2% 0.0% 4.9% 52.6% 33.5% 47.4% 52.1% 0.0% 9.5%
Hispanic 61 -20.3% -6.1% 21.3% 13.9% 55.7% 48.9% 21.3% 34.6% 1.6% 2.6%
Black 16 -30.8% -5.8% 31.3% 15.3% 56.3% 47.1% 12.5% 34.4% 0.0% 3.1%
White 33 14.3% 22.3% 3.0% 4.9% 39.4% 29.4% 54.5% 54.7% 3.0% 10.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 10 -33.3% -26.6% 60.0% 36.5% 30.0% 46.8% 10.0% 15.7% 0.0% 1.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 -35.6% -31.2% 34.6% 27.5% 57.7% 60.4% 7.7% 11.9% 0.0% 0.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 47 -17.8% -5.9% 23.4% 14.2% 51.1% 48.4% 23.4% 34.5% 2.1% 2.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 175 -16.3% -6.1% 16.0% 15.1% 54.9% 45.6% 28.0% 35.1% 1.1% 4.2%
Male 94 -23.1% -10.0% 19.1% 18.1% 58.5% 46.6% 21.3% 32.2% 1.1% 3.2%
Female 81 -8.4% -2.2% 12.3% 12.1% 50.6% 44.7% 35.8% 38.1% 1.2% 5.1%
Asian 22 -36.3% 2.9% 9.1% 8.6% 81.8% 43.1% 9.1% 42.8% 0.0% 5.5%
Hispanic 71 -20.0% -19.6% 21.1% 21.6% 53.5% 52.7% 25.4% 24.3% 0.0% 1.4%
Black 29 -24.7% -22.9% 24.1% 25.2% 55.2% 52.2% 20.7% 20.9% 0.0% 1.6%
White 51 3.6% 7.4% 7.8% 8.5% 43.1% 38.6% 45.1% 46.1% 3.9% 6.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 16 -45.4% -34.8% 75.0% 47.5% 25.0% 41.9% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -45.4% -37.7% 50.0% 41.4% 50.0% 50.9% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 0.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 83 -22.5% -20.8% 20.5% 22.8% 56.6% 52.6% 22.9% 23.3% 0.0% 1.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 119 2.9% -2.9% 11.0% 14.1% 40.7% 43.4% 39.8% 36.9% 8.5% 5.6%
Male 60 2.1% -5.6% 16.9% 16.7% 35.6% 43.5% 37.3% 34.9% 10.2% 4.9%
Female 57 3.7% 0.2% 5.3% 11.1% 45.6% 43.3% 43.9% 39.2% 5.3% 6.4%
Asian 22 13.7% 8.4% 0.0% 7.1% 40.9% 39.1% 40.9% 46.2% 18.2% 7.5%
Hispanic 35 -11.1% -19.7% 14.3% 22.3% 51.4% 51.9% 34.3% 23.9% 0.0% 1.8%
Black 13 -37.1% -19.8% 25.0% 22.5% 66.7% 51.9% 8.3% 23.4% 0.0% 2.1%
White 46 17.6% 12.3% 10.9% 6.9% 26.1% 35.4% 52.2% 48.6% 10.9% 9.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 12 -27.2% -31.8% 36.4% 43.9% 45.5% 42.4% 9.1% 12.6% 9.1% 1.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 19 -24.3% -35.3% 26.3% 35.9% 52.6% 54.0% 21.1% 9.8% 0.0% 0.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 42 -13.7% -18.8% 19.5% 21.8% 48.8% 51.6% 26.8% 24.6% 4.9% 2.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 134 0.6% 9.0% 16.4% 12.5% 48.5% 43.9% 29.9% 37.3% 5.2% 6.3%
Male 72 -5.3% 5.8% 22.2% 14.8% 48.6% 44.9% 22.2% 35.4% 6.9% 4.9%
Female 62 7.4% 12.5% 9.7% 10.0% 48.4% 43.0% 38.7% 39.3% 3.2% 7.7%
Asian 23 -8.4% 16.4% 21.7% 7.2% 52.2% 41.9% 26.1% 44.2% 0.0% 6.7%
Hispanic 35 -11.6% -9.0% 20.0% 20.0% 57.1% 54.6% 20.0% 23.4% 2.9% 2.1%
Black 22 -7.2% -7.4% 31.8% 20.5% 40.9% 52.4% 22.7% 25.4% 4.5% 1.7%
White 54 15.5% 23.8% 5.6% 6.5% 44.4% 35.2% 40.7% 48.2% 9.3% 10.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 10 -24.5% -21.7% 50.0% 43.3% 40.0% 43.8% 10.0% 11.7% 0.0% 1.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 17 -34.5% -23.8% 29.4% 30.7% 70.6% 58.6% 0.0% 10.4% 0.0% 0.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 -11.4% -6.8% 28.2% 19.1% 48.7% 53.1% 20.5% 25.4% 2.6% 2.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 133 15.6% 23.0% 26.6% 25.4% 28.1% 25.9% 29.7% 25.7%
Male 67 21.5% 27.8% 23.1% 26.6% 26.2% 24.3% 29.2% 21.3%
Female 66 9.5% 18.0% 30.2% 24.2% 30.2% 27.5% 30.2% 30.3%
Asian 21 15.0% 10.0% 15.0% 18.1% 35.0% 27.0% 35.0% 44.9%
Black 16 21.4% 33.3% 14.3% 26.8% 50.0% 22.5% 14.3% 17.3%
White 34 9.1% 14.6% 30.3% 21.5% 15.2% 27.9% 45.5% 36.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 35 20.6% 42.6% 35.3% 33.4% 32.4% 18.1% 11.8% 5.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 66 17.2% 33.1% 26.6% 29.8% 31.3% 23.3% 25.0% 13.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 138 16.7% 22.9% 16.7% 24.2% 30.4% 25.4% 36.2% 27.5%
Male 61 26.2% 27.7% 21.3% 25.4% 29.5% 24.0% 23.0% 22.9%
Female 79 13.9% 17.9% 17.7% 23.1% 29.1% 26.8% 39.2% 32.2%
Asian 19 5.3% 10.7% 10.5% 16.3% 26.3% 28.0% 57.9% 45.0%
Black 23 21.7% 31.6% 13.0% 28.0% 39.1% 23.7% 26.1% 16.7%
White 35 2.9% 14.0% 14.3% 19.8% 28.6% 27.6% 54.3% 38.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 61.1% 52.9% 16.7% 23.7% 16.7% 14.2% 5.6% 9.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 31 29.0% 46.7% 38.7% 32.4% 22.6% 16.5% 9.7% 4.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 58 20.7% 33.6% 15.5% 29.3% 29.3% 22.6% 34.5% 14.5%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 119 19.3% 23.5% 21.8% 24.8% 23.5% 25.1% 35.3% 26.5%
Male 51 21.6% 28.3% 25.5% 25.6% 21.6% 23.9% 31.4% 22.3%
Female 68 17.6% 18.5% 19.1% 24.1% 25.0% 26.4% 38.2% 30.9%
Asian 18 5.6% 10.4% 11.1% 18.5% 33.3% 27.6% 50.0% 43.5%
Hispanic 54 22.2% 34.6% 29.6% 29.7% 20.4% 22.1% 27.8% 13.6%
Black 12 50.0% 33.1% 16.7% 27.9% 16.7% 21.8% 16.7% 17.2%
White 33 12.1% 14.3% 15.2% 21.0% 24.2% 27.9% 48.5% 36.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 47.6% 55.2% 33.3% 30.6% 14.3% 11.0% 4.8% 3.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 26.9% 35.0% 25.0% 29.2% 23.1% 21.7% 25.0% 14.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 130 13.2% 23.5% 25.6% 25.1% 31.0% 24.9% 30.2% 26.6%
Male 67 20.9% 27.9% 28.4% 26.1% 32.8% 23.5% 17.9% 22.5%
Female 63 4.8% 18.9% 22.6% 24.0% 29.0% 26.2% 43.5% 30.9%
Asian 19 0.0% 10.8% 36.8% 18.4% 26.3% 27.1% 36.8% 43.7%
Hispanic 47 14.9% 34.9% 29.8% 29.8% 27.7% 21.6% 27.7% 13.7%
Black 21 28.6% 34.2% 23.8% 28.7% 33.3% 22.3% 14.3% 14.8%
White 41 10.0% 14.5% 17.5% 21.7% 32.5% 27.3% 40.0% 36.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 20.0% 53.7% 50.0% 24.7% 20.0% 13.6% 10.0% 8.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 14.3% 52.9% 57.1% 30.9% 28.6% 12.7% 0.0% 3.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 50 20.0% 35.3% 32.0% 30.0% 18.0% 21.1% 30.0% 13.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 114 21.1% 26.8% 21.9% 23.8% 23.7% 24.0% 33.3% 25.4%
Male 58 20.7% 31.1% 31.0% 24.4% 19.0% 22.9% 29.3% 21.6%
Female 56 21.4% 22.2% 12.5% 23.1% 28.6% 25.2% 37.5% 29.5%
Asian 24 4.2% 12.6% 25.0% 17.9% 25.0% 29.0% 45.8% 40.5%
Hispanic 33 36.4% 39.4% 18.2% 28.6% 27.3% 20.2% 18.2% 11.9%
Black 10 50.0% 37.8% 30.0% 25.9% 10.0% 22.3% 10.0% 14.0%
White 46 13.0% 17.5% 21.7% 20.6% 21.7% 26.3% 43.5% 35.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 16 50.0% 57.0% 12.5% 23.0% 25.0% 12.1% 12.5% 7.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 40.9% 48.4% 27.3% 29.2% 18.2% 15.9% 13.6% 6.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 35.5% 38.2% 25.8% 28.3% 25.8% 21.0% 12.9% 12.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 133 16.4% 20.6% 31.3% 24.2% 28.9% 27.9% 23.4% 27.3%
Male 67 23.1% 21.9% 16.9% 23.0% 29.2% 26.4% 30.8% 28.7%
Female 66 9.5% 19.2% 46.0% 25.4% 28.6% 29.6% 15.9% 25.8%
Asian 21 5.0% 10.1% 35.0% 18.9% 35.0% 28.9% 25.0% 42.2%
Black 16 33.3% 34.3% 20.0% 27.1% 26.7% 23.1% 20.0% 15.6%
White 34 6.1% 13.1% 30.3% 20.4% 27.3% 29.1% 36.4% 37.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 35 29.4% 34.0% 38.2% 31.8% 20.6% 24.0% 11.8% 10.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 66 20.6% 28.9% 30.2% 27.9% 31.7% 26.7% 17.5% 16.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 138 22.5% 20.8% 19.6% 24.4% 31.2% 27.4% 26.8% 27.3%
Male 61 29.5% 21.6% 24.6% 23.6% 27.9% 26.1% 18.0% 28.7%
Female 79 17.7% 20.0% 24.1% 25.3% 29.1% 28.7% 29.1% 26.0%
Asian 19 5.3% 9.7% 21.1% 19.3% 31.6% 29.2% 42.1% 41.9%
Black 23 39.1% 33.8% 13.0% 28.6% 39.1% 23.0% 8.7% 14.6%
White 35 8.6% 12.7% 14.3% 20.2% 31.4% 28.8% 45.7% 38.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 55.6% 46.5% 22.2% 24.6% 11.1% 16.6% 11.1% 12.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 31 35.5% 38.2% 29.0% 32.6% 22.6% 21.5% 12.9% 7.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 58 27.6% 29.7% 19.0% 29.1% 25.9% 25.5% 27.6% 15.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 119 13.7% 21.4% 27.4% 24.6% 29.9% 26.9% 29.1% 27.0%
Male 51 12.0% 22.6% 24.0% 23.5% 34.0% 25.5% 30.0% 28.5%
Female 68 14.9% 20.3% 29.9% 25.7% 26.9% 28.5% 28.4% 25.6%
Asian 18 0.0% 10.8% 22.2% 20.7% 33.3% 27.8% 44.4% 40.7%
Hispanic 54 11.5% 30.1% 32.7% 28.9% 28.8% 25.5% 26.9% 15.5%
Black 12 58.3% 34.7% 25.0% 27.9% 16.7% 22.3% 0.0% 15.1%
White 33 6.1% 13.0% 24.2% 20.8% 33.3% 28.9% 36.4% 37.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 19.0% 45.3% 57.1% 31.5% 9.5% 17.2% 14.3% 6.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 21.6% 31.5% 31.4% 29.1% 21.6% 24.2% 25.5% 15.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 130 12.5% 22.1% 28.1% 25.2% 32.8% 27.2% 26.6% 25.5%
Male 67 17.9% 23.3% 31.3% 24.0% 28.4% 26.1% 22.4% 26.6%
Female 63 6.6% 20.9% 24.6% 26.4% 37.7% 28.2% 31.1% 24.4%
Asian 19 0.0% 11.4% 31.6% 20.2% 42.1% 30.4% 26.3% 38.0%
Hispanic 47 12.8% 30.3% 29.8% 30.5% 38.3% 24.9% 19.1% 14.4%
Black 21 35.0% 36.3% 20.0% 28.3% 30.0% 22.9% 15.0% 12.5%
White 41 7.5% 14.4% 25.0% 21.2% 25.0% 29.3% 42.5% 35.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 30.0% 48.9% 20.0% 24.5% 30.0% 16.4% 20.0% 10.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 14.3% 43.7% 52.4% 31.8% 23.8% 17.8% 9.5% 6.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 50 16.3% 31.9% 36.7% 30.0% 22.4% 24.0% 24.5% 14.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 114 13.2% 25.0% 26.3% 23.9% 30.7% 26.7% 29.8% 24.5%
Male 58 8.6% 25.6% 25.9% 22.8% 34.5% 25.7% 31.0% 25.9%
Female 56 17.9% 24.4% 26.8% 24.9% 26.8% 27.7% 28.6% 23.0%
Asian 24 8.3% 14.5% 16.7% 17.9% 33.3% 31.4% 41.7% 36.2%
Hispanic 33 12.1% 34.2% 48.5% 28.1% 27.3% 24.8% 12.1% 12.9%
Black 10 50.0% 39.3% 20.0% 27.7% 20.0% 21.4% 10.0% 11.6%
White 46 8.7% 16.8% 17.4% 20.8% 32.6% 28.5% 41.3% 34.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 16 31.3% 51.5% 18.8% 24.3% 18.8% 15.1% 31.3% 9.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 18.2% 39.8% 45.5% 29.1% 18.2% 22.0% 18.2% 9.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 12.9% 34.8% 54.8% 28.0% 25.8% 23.9% 6.5% 13.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 133 17.8% 23.7% 38.0% 27.6% 24.0% 25.3% 20.2% 23.5%
Male 67 22.7% 25.9% 30.3% 27.8% 25.8% 24.1% 21.2% 22.2%
Female 66 12.7% 21.4% 46.0% 27.3% 22.2% 26.5% 19.0% 24.8%
Asian 21 15.0% 13.4% 40.0% 26.1% 35.0% 30.3% 10.0% 30.2%
Black 16 20.0% 31.9% 33.3% 30.0% 33.3% 23.9% 13.3% 14.2%
White 34 12.1% 11.6% 36.4% 21.5% 9.1% 29.4% 42.4% 37.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 35 23.5% 51.7% 61.8% 34.9% 11.8% 11.1% 2.9% 2.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 66 24.6% 35.4% 33.8% 32.7% 26.2% 21.0% 15.4% 10.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 138 24.6% 24.8% 32.6% 27.0% 27.5% 24.8% 15.2% 23.4%
Male 61 36.1% 26.9% 39.3% 27.2% 19.7% 23.5% 4.9% 22.4%
Female 79 24.1% 22.6% 31.6% 26.9% 25.3% 26.1% 19.0% 24.4%
Asian 19 10.5% 14.1% 42.1% 26.7% 26.3% 30.1% 21.1% 29.1%
Black 23 34.8% 31.9% 21.7% 31.6% 34.8% 22.4% 8.7% 14.1%
White 35 5.7% 11.5% 22.9% 21.6% 37.1% 29.7% 34.3% 37.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 61.1% 54.0% 16.7% 24.4% 22.2% 12.8% 0.0% 8.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 31 45.2% 58.9% 45.2% 31.7% 3.2% 8.0% 6.5% 1.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 58 24.1% 37.9% 32.8% 31.7% 31.0% 20.1% 12.1% 10.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 119 25.2% 25.9% 29.4% 26.5% 26.9% 23.9% 18.5% 23.7%
Male 51 25.5% 27.9% 29.4% 26.6% 31.4% 22.9% 13.7% 22.6%
Female 68 25.0% 23.9% 29.4% 26.5% 23.5% 24.8% 22.1% 24.8%
Asian 18 11.1% 15.0% 22.2% 25.4% 44.4% 31.1% 22.2% 28.5%
Hispanic 54 35.2% 42.7% 29.6% 30.3% 20.4% 17.9% 14.8% 9.1%
Black 12 58.3% 35.2% 33.3% 31.2% 8.3% 19.5% 0.0% 14.1%
White 33 6.1% 11.9% 30.3% 22.3% 33.3% 28.5% 30.3% 37.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 52.4% 68.3% 19.0% 24.5% 19.0% 5.4% 9.5% 1.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 28.8% 40.0% 36.5% 30.7% 23.1% 18.6% 11.5% 10.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 130 17.8% 25.8% 33.3% 26.9% 30.2% 24.0% 18.6% 23.3%
Male 67 20.9% 27.3% 40.3% 27.3% 23.9% 23.2% 14.9% 22.1%
Female 63 14.5% 24.1% 25.8% 26.4% 37.1% 24.9% 22.6% 24.5%
Asian 19 10.5% 15.7% 42.1% 26.6% 31.6% 31.3% 15.8% 26.4%
Hispanic 47 23.4% 43.2% 29.8% 31.3% 31.9% 17.0% 14.9% 8.5%
Black 21 33.3% 35.1% 28.6% 31.6% 28.6% 22.0% 9.5% 11.4%
White 41 7.5% 12.5% 37.5% 22.4% 27.5% 28.5% 27.5% 36.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 50.0% 53.6% 30.0% 25.9% 10.0% 12.5% 10.0% 8.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 42.9% 65.6% 47.6% 26.0% 9.5% 6.9% 0.0% 1.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 50 24.0% 40.3% 36.0% 31.0% 30.0% 18.7% 10.0% 10.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 114 24.6% 27.4% 24.6% 27.0% 26.3% 21.2% 24.6% 24.4%
Male 58 22.4% 28.7% 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 20.5% 22.4% 23.2%
Female 56 26.8% 26.0% 21.4% 26.4% 25.0% 21.9% 26.8% 25.6%
Asian 24 16.7% 16.1% 33.3% 28.1% 33.3% 28.0% 16.7% 27.8%
Hispanic 33 48.5% 46.3% 21.2% 30.3% 15.2% 15.0% 15.2% 8.4%
Black 10 50.0% 37.3% 20.0% 32.1% 30.0% 18.0% 0.0% 12.6%
White 46 6.5% 13.9% 23.9% 23.3% 28.3% 25.2% 41.3% 37.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 16 50.0% 54.6% 18.8% 27.4% 6.3% 10.3% 25.0% 7.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 59.1% 58.9% 27.3% 28.5% 13.6% 9.5% 0.0% 3.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 48.4% 41.5% 19.4% 30.9% 22.6% 16.7% 9.7% 11.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 133 16.7% 19.9% 29.5% 26.8% 37.9% 31.5% 15.9% 21.8%
Male 67 24.2% 21.4% 21.2% 26.2% 36.4% 29.8% 18.2% 22.6%
Female 66 9.1% 18.2% 37.9% 27.6% 39.4% 33.3% 13.6% 20.9%
Asian 21 4.8% 13.2% 33.3% 22.9% 38.1% 35.2% 23.8% 28.7%
Black 16 20.0% 29.7% 20.0% 33.6% 53.3% 26.2% 6.7% 10.5%
White 34 8.8% 11.8% 32.4% 19.6% 35.3% 34.4% 23.5% 34.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 35 28.6% 35.4% 40.0% 38.4% 25.7% 22.2% 5.7% 4.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 66 20.0% 28.0% 33.8% 33.0% 33.8% 28.2% 12.3% 10.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 138 32.1% 21.4% 26.3% 26.8% 29.9% 30.8% 11.7% 21.1%
Male 61 43.3% 22.7% 31.7% 26.0% 20.0% 29.2% 5.0% 22.1%
Female 79 33.3% 20.0% 25.6% 27.6% 29.5% 32.5% 11.5% 20.0%
Asian 19 26.3% 14.1% 21.1% 23.9% 31.6% 36.2% 21.1% 25.7%
Black 23 43.5% 33.1% 26.1% 31.7% 26.1% 25.2% 4.3% 10.0%
White 35 8.6% 11.9% 20.0% 20.2% 48.6% 34.6% 22.9% 33.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 50.0% 35.7% 27.8% 30.8% 22.2% 22.3% 0.0% 11.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 31 45.2% 41.0% 45.2% 37.9% 9.7% 18.4% 0.0% 2.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 58 29.3% 30.7% 36.2% 32.5% 24.1% 26.7% 10.3% 10.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 119 26.9% 22.4% 24.4% 26.3% 34.5% 30.7% 14.3% 20.6%
Male 51 25.5% 23.7% 29.4% 25.6% 31.4% 29.4% 13.7% 21.3%
Female 68 27.9% 21.1% 20.6% 27.1% 36.8% 31.9% 14.7% 19.9%
Asian 18 5.6% 14.1% 27.8% 25.5% 44.4% 36.4% 22.2% 24.0%
Hispanic 54 29.6% 33.0% 29.6% 32.3% 33.3% 25.6% 7.4% 9.1%
Black 12 66.7% 33.3% 25.0% 30.7% 8.3% 26.0% 0.0% 10.0%
White 33 15.2% 12.6% 15.2% 20.4% 42.4% 34.8% 27.3% 32.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 42.9% 48.1% 23.8% 35.9% 28.6% 13.8% 4.8% 2.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 40.4% 32.4% 19.2% 32.2% 30.8% 25.9% 9.6% 9.5%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 130 19.5% 22.7% 20.3% 27.3% 38.3% 30.2% 21.9% 19.8%
Male 67 25.4% 23.8% 20.9% 27.0% 40.3% 28.9% 13.4% 20.2%
Female 63 13.1% 21.5% 19.7% 27.6% 36.1% 31.5% 31.1% 19.4%
Asian 19 15.8% 14.8% 31.6% 27.5% 36.8% 33.8% 15.8% 23.9%
Hispanic 47 19.1% 33.2% 14.9% 33.5% 46.8% 25.2% 19.1% 8.0%
Black 21 40.0% 35.6% 20.0% 32.7% 30.0% 23.5% 10.0% 8.2%
White 41 10.0% 13.2% 22.5% 21.5% 32.5% 34.7% 35.0% 30.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 50.0% 37.1% 10.0% 33.3% 30.0% 19.9% 10.0% 9.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 33.3% 47.2% 28.6% 35.3% 23.8% 14.9% 14.3% 2.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 50 26.5% 32.7% 22.4% 33.4% 38.8% 25.0% 12.2% 9.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 114 18.4% 22.4% 27.2% 24.1% 32.5% 33.2% 21.9% 20.4%
Male 58 19.0% 23.9% 24.1% 23.5% 31.0% 31.7% 25.9% 21.0%
Female 56 17.9% 20.8% 30.4% 24.7% 33.9% 34.7% 17.9% 19.8%
Asian 24 8.3% 14.3% 25.0% 24.0% 50.0% 39.8% 16.7% 21.9%
Hispanic 33 27.3% 32.3% 33.3% 30.9% 27.3% 28.4% 12.1% 8.4%
Black 10 50.0% 33.4% 30.0% 30.7% 10.0% 27.7% 10.0% 8.3%
White 46 10.9% 14.1% 23.9% 17.9% 30.4% 36.8% 34.8% 31.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 16 37.5% 38.7% 18.8% 28.7% 18.8% 24.2% 25.0% 8.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 40.9% 38.6% 36.4% 34.3% 13.6% 23.0% 9.1% 4.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 25.8% 31.4% 45.2% 30.3% 19.4% 29.0% 9.7% 9.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Sunrise Manor, NV
Daniel Goldfarb Elementary School in Sunrise Manor, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: