City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 45.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Bartow Elementary Academy School (12.4 miles): | 93 |
| Eastside Elementary School (10.6 miles): | 66 |
| Gibbons Street Elementary School (12.5 miles): | 53 |
| East Area Adult/Community School: | 45 |
| Rochelle Of The Arts School (11.1 miles): | 45 |
| Highland City Elementary School (9.2 miles): | 37 |
| Combee Elementary School (7.5 miles): | 29 |
| Eagle Lake Elementary School (6.1 miles): | 21 |
East Area Adult/Community School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Polk County: | 41 |
| Auburndale: | 47 |
| East Area Adult/Community School: | 45 |
1
sarah thomas
Jan 13, 2011 @ 9:21 pm
what a great school . love all my teachers and guidance hope to inish by 2011
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 53
School number: 871
School type: Adult
District Name: POLK
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 965-5477
Principal: Wayne Dickens
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 65
Senate District: 15
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 454 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 541 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 43% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 228 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 202
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 202
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 38% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 463 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 557 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 48% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 42% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 199 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 199 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 545 |
| State average from 131 schools: | 540 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 47% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1138 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 273 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 1312 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 274 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 1295 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 247 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 1 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1282 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 51% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 1426 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 15% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1516 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 28% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1082 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%| Here: | 264 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1267 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%| Here: | 266 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 07
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1465 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%| Here: | 277 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 294 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1231 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 285 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1279 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%| Here: | 260 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 1634 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 70
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 4| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1123 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%| Here: | 271 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1408 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1474 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 279 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1288 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1457 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1625 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 324 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 56 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 606 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 37 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 46 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 633 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 52 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 55 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 653 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 60 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%| EAST AREA ADULT/COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 283 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.