Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School in Cudahy, CA
(KG-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 16
- Address
- 5027 Live Oak St.
Cudahy, CA 90201
- Telephone
- (323) 869-1300
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- City-data.com school rating
- 16
- Students
- 1,425
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 58.5
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - Yes, under Community Eligibility Option (CEO)
- Free lunch eligible students
- 1,121
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 137
- School district
- Los Angeles Unified
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Los Angeles County: | 44 |
Cudahy: | 19 |
Ellen Ochoa Learning Center: | 16 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 1,425
Enrollment in 2015: 1,413
Enrollment in 2014: 1,478
Enrollment in 2013: 1,517
Enrollment in 2012: 1,539
Enrollment in 2011: 1,638
Enrollment in 2010: 1,649
Enrollment in 2009: 1,936
Enrollment in 2008: 1,929
Enrollment in 2007: 1,962
Enrollment in 2006: 1,916
Enrollment in 2005: 1,807
Enrollment in 2004: 316
Enrollment in 2003: 305
Enrollment in 2002: 307
Enrollment in 2001: 227
Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | KG | G01 | G02 | G03 | G04 | G05 | G06 | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|
All students | 182 | 112 | 135 | 138 | 145 | 136 | 139 | 195 | 243 | 1,425 |
Female students | 88 | 48 | 68 | 69 | 67 | 63 | 63 | 102 | 135 | 703 |
Male students | 94 | 64 | 67 | 69 | 78 | 73 | 76 | 93 | 108 | 722 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Hispanic students | 177 | 112 | 132 | 137 | 142 | 136 | 138 | 193 | 239 | 1,406 |
Black students | 2 | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | 5 |
White students | 3 | - | 1 | - | 2 | - | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 |
Two or More Races students | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 182
1st grade enrollment: 112
2nd grade enrollment: 135
3rd grade enrollment: 138
4th grade enrollment: 145
5th grade enrollment: 136
6th grade enrollment: 139
7th grade enrollment: 195
8th grade enrollment: 243
Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 703 (49.3%)School: | 49.3% |
California: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 722 (50.7%)School: | 50.7% |
California: | 49.6% |
Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.1%)Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 0.1% |
California: | 1.0% |
Hispanic enrollment: 1,406 (98.7%)Here: | 98.7% |
California: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 5 (0.4%)School: | 0.4% |
California: | 6.1% |
White enrollment: 11 (0.8%)School: | 0.8% |
California: | 28.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Two or More Races enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 1,258 (88.3%)Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 88.3% |
California: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 1,121 (78.7%)Here: | 78.7% |
California: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 137 (9.6%)
Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 58.5
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE school counselors: 3
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 2
Number of FTE psychologists: 4
Number of FTE social workers: 1
Student/Teacher RatioEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 24.4 |
California: | 22.8 |
Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$5,338,764- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 53.9 (Salary Expenditures: $4,500,937)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1.3 (Salary Expenditures: $29,363)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3.4 (Salary Expenditures: $411,498)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5.5 (Salary Expenditures: $396,967)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$417,778Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$7,518,933- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $5,676,154
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 21 (Salary Expenditures: $516,009)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5.8 (Salary Expenditures: $829,546)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5.5 (Salary Expenditures: $497,224)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$443,540 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic529
- Black2
- White4
- IDEA79
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 535 (male: 294, female: 241)
- Hispanic: 529 (male: 290, female: 239)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 79 (male: 56, female: 23)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic622
- American Indian2
- Black2
- White4
- IDEA85
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 630 (male: 350, female: 280)
- Hispanic: 622 (male: 344, female: 278)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 85 (male: 65, female: 20)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 134 (male: 94, female: 40)
- Hispanic: 134 (male: 94, female: 40)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 86 (male: 61, female: 25)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 140 (male: 106, female: 34)
- Hispanic: 140 (male: 106, female: 34)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 89 (male: 67, female: 22)
Retention:
(State average from 2,659 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Percent of Kindergarten students retainedSchool: | 1.1% |
California: | 5.3% |
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
Percent of 1st grade students retainedEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 1.8% |
California: | 4.8% |
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Percent of Kindergarten students retainedEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 2.2% |
State: | 5.6% |
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Percent of 5th grade students retainedEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 1.5% |
State: | 2.3% |
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic94
- White2
- LEP2
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 96 (male: 38, female: 58)
- Hispanic: 94 (male: 38, female: 56)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic118
- Asian2
- White2
- LEP2
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 122 (male: 53, female: 69)
- Hispanic: 118 (male: 53, female: 65)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 85.6 |
State: | 93.6 |
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All28%
- Males25%
- Females32%
- Hispanic28%
ELA students tested: 917
ELA students with scores: 917
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 28% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
41.9%Standard Nearly Met:
29.8%Standard Met:
23.0%Standard Exceeded:
5.3%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2368.5, Students tested: 123, Standard Not Met: 46.3%, Nearly Met: 39.0%, Met: 11.4%, Exceeded: 3.3%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2401.9, Students tested: 124, Standard Not Met: 57.3%, Nearly Met: 18.6%, Met: 16.9%, Exceeded: 7.3%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2437.2, Students tested: 133, Standard Not Met: 49.6%, Nearly Met: 23.3%, Met: 21.8%, Exceeded: 5.3%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2478.5, Students tested: 133, Standard Not Met: 42.1%, Nearly Met: 28.6%, Met: 27.1%, Exceeded: 2.3%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2523.4, Students tested: 206, Standard Not Met: 25.7%, Nearly Met: 33.5%, Met: 34.0%, Exceeded: 6.8%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2516.5, Students tested: 198, Standard Not Met: 40.9%, Nearly Met: 32.3%, Met: 20.7%, Exceeded: 6.1%)Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All16%
- Males15%
- Females17%
- Hispanic16%
Math students tested: 922
Math students with scores: 922
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 16% |
California: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
53.9%Standard Nearly Met:
29.9%Standard Met:
12.2%Standard Exceeded:
4.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2379.0, Students tested: 123, Standard Not Met: 48.8%, Nearly Met: 36.6%, Met: 14.6%, Exceeded: 0.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2410.9, Students tested: 124, Standard Not Met: 57.3%, Nearly Met: 24.2%, Met: 16.1%, Exceeded: 2.4%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2427.7, Students tested: 132, Standard Not Met: 65.2%, Nearly Met: 29.6%, Met: 4.5%, Exceeded: 0.8%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2446.3, Students tested: 138, Standard Not Met: 60.1%, Nearly Met: 30.4%, Met: 8.0%, Exceeded: 1.4%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2494.1, Students tested: 205, Standard Not Met: 46.8%, Nearly Met: 32.2%, Met: 12.7%, Exceeded: 8.3%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2503.0, Students tested: 200, Standard Not Met: 50.5%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 15.5%, Exceeded: 7.0%)Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All29%
- Males22%
- Females35%
- Hispanic28%
ELA students tested: 984
ELA students with scores: 983
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 29% |
State: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
41.0%Standard Nearly Met:
30.0%Standard Met:
23.0%Standard Exceeded:
6.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2369.2, Students tested: 129, Standard Not Met: 52.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 12.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2404.5, Students tested: 139, Standard Not Met: 58.0%, Nearly Met: 20.0%, Met: 17.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2442.5, Students tested: 129, Standard Not Met: 50.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 19.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2490.8, Students tested: 138, Standard Not Met: 32.0%, Nearly Met: 36.0%, Met: 28.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2499.0, Students tested: 200, Standard Not Met: 41.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 24.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2543.9, Students tested: 249, Standard Not Met: 26.0%, Nearly Met: 35.0%, Met: 31.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All15%
- Males15%
- Females15%
- Hispanic15%
Math students tested: 984
Math students with scores: 983
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 15% |
State: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
53.0%Standard Nearly Met:
32.0%Standard Met:
12.0%Standard Exceeded:
3.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2367.6, Students tested: 128, Standard Not Met: 59.0%, Nearly Met: 23.0%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2411.0, Students tested: 140, Standard Not Met: 53.0%, Nearly Met: 36.0%, Met: 9.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2414.2, Students tested: 131, Standard Not Met: 77.0%, Nearly Met: 20.0%, Met: 2.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2459.9, Students tested: 138, Standard Not Met: 52.0%, Nearly Met: 39.0%, Met: 7.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2486.5, Students tested: 199, Standard Not Met: 47.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 18.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2513.8, Students tested: 248, Standard Not Met: 43.0%, Nearly Met: 38.0%, Met: 14.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All23%
- Males17%
- Females28%
- Hispanic23%
ELA students tested: 983
ELA students with scores: 983
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 23% |
State: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
49.0%Standard Nearly Met:
28.0%Standard Met:
19.0%Standard Exceeded:
3.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2335.4, Students tested: 144, Standard Not Met: 70.0%, Nearly Met: 20.0%, Met: 9.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2388.6, Students tested: 134, Standard Not Met: 63.0%, Nearly Met: 22.0%, Met: 12.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2444.3, Students tested: 116, Standard Not Met: 52.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 19.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2473.4, Students tested: 137, Standard Not Met: 41.0%, Nearly Met: 39.0%, Met: 19.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2501.5, Students tested: 248, Standard Not Met: 42.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 25.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2515.9, Students tested: 204, Standard Not Met: 39.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 25.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All15%
- Males14%
- Females16%
- Hispanic15%
Math students tested: 983
Math students with scores: 983
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 15% |
State: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
53.0%Standard Nearly Met:
32.0%Standard Met:
12.0%Standard Exceeded:
3.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2355.0, Students tested: 145, Standard Not Met: 63.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2405.6, Students tested: 134, Standard Not Met: 57.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 8.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2438.3, Students tested: 116, Standard Not Met: 66.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 7.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2457.7, Students tested: 136, Standard Not Met: 52.0%, Nearly Met: 35.0%, Met: 10.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2496.6, Students tested: 248, Standard Not Met: 39.0%, Nearly Met: 41.0%, Met: 18.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2495.5, Students tested: 204, Standard Not Met: 52.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 9.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
California Modified Assessment (CMA) - The CMA for science was administered to eligible students in grades five, eight, and ten. The CMA is a standards-based test for students with an individualized education program who meet the eligibility criteria adopted by the State Board of Education. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act called for a range of assessments appropriate to students' abilities. The CMA provides an appropriate assessment for a small percentage of students allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of skills in the California academic content standards for science.
Standards-based Tests in Spanish (STS) - The STS consists of multiple-choice tests in Spanish that assess RLA in grades two through eleven. Local education agencies had the option of administering the STS for RLA to the Spanish-speaking English learners (ELs) in grades two through eleven who either were receiving instruction in Spanish or had been enrolled in school in the United States for less than 12 months when testing began.
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 33
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 33
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 6% |
State: | 21% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
57.6% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
36.4% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
6.1% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.:
(Mean Scale Score: 296.7, Students tested: 33, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 57.6%, Basic: 36.4%, Proficient: 6.1%, Advanced: 0.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 22
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 22
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 9% |
California: | 21% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
9.1% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
40.9% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
40.9% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
9.1% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 296.1, Students tested: 22, Far Below Basic: 9.1%, Below Basic: 40.9%, Basic: 40.9%, Proficient: 9.1%, Advanced: 0.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 16
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 16
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 0% |
California: | 21% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
12.5% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
50.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
37.5% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
0.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 291.4, Students tested: 16, Far Below Basic: 12.5%, Below Basic: 50.0%, Basic: 37.5%, Proficient: 0.0%, Advanced: 0.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 21
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 21
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 10% |
California: | 21% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
52.4% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
9.5% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
28.6% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
9.5% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 288.7, Students tested: 21, Far Below Basic: 52.4%, Below Basic: 9.5%, Basic: 28.6%, Proficient: 9.5%, Advanced: 0.0%) CST Science students tested: 137
CST Science students with scores: 137
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 31% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
10.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
16.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
43.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
25.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
6.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 327.9, Students tested: 137, Far Below Basic: 10.0%, Below Basic: 16.0%, Basic: 43.0%, Proficient: 25.0%, Advanced: 6.0%)
CST Science students tested: 247
CST Science students with scores: 246
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 50% |
California: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
16.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
26.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
27.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
23.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 353.3, Students tested: 247, Far Below Basic: 8.0%, Below Basic: 16.0%, Basic: 26.0%, Proficient: 27.0%, Advanced: 23.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 29
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 29
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 14% |
State: | 23% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
45.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
41.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
10.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
3.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.:
(Mean Scale Score: 308.2, Students tested: 29, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 45.0%, Basic: 41.0%, Proficient: 10.0%, Advanced: 3.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 26
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 26
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 15% |
State: | 23% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
4.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
50.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
31.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
8.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
8.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 305.3, Students tested: 26, Far Below Basic: 4.0%, Below Basic: 50.0%, Basic: 31.0%, Proficient: 8.0%, Advanced: 8.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 25
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 25
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 12% |
California: | 23% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
36.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
28.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
8.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
4.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 291.8, Students tested: 25, Far Below Basic: 24.0%, Below Basic: 36.0%, Basic: 28.0%, Proficient: 8.0%, Advanced: 4.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 17
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 17
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 6% |
California: | 23% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
58.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
12.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
0.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
6.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 272.2, Students tested: 17, Far Below Basic: 58.0%, Below Basic: 24.0%, Basic: 12.0%, Proficient: 0.0%, Advanced: 6.0%) CST Science students tested: 117
CST Science students with scores: 117
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 32% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
45.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
26.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
5.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 330.6, Students tested: 117, Far Below Basic: 8.0%, Below Basic: 15.0%, Basic: 45.0%, Proficient: 26.0%, Advanced: 5.0%)
CST Science students tested: 197
CST Science students with scores: 197
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 41% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
14.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
28.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
13.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 329.6, Students tested: 197, Far Below Basic: 18.0%, Below Basic: 14.0%, Basic: 27.0%, Proficient: 28.0%, Advanced: 13.0%)18.0%
14.0%
27.0%
28.0%
13.0%
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 40
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 39
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 18% |
California: | 24% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
49.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
33.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
13.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
5.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.:
(Mean Scale Score: 305.5, Students tested: 40, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 49.0%, Basic: 33.0%, Proficient: 13.0%, Advanced: 5.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 44
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 44
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 20% |
California: | 24% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
16.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
34.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
30.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
18.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
2.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 303.4, Students tested: 44, Far Below Basic: 16.0%, Below Basic: 34.0%, Basic: 30.0%, Proficient: 18.0%, Advanced: 2.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 38
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 36
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 6% |
California: | 24% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
31.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
39.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
6.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 286.2, Students tested: 38, Far Below Basic: 24.0%, Below Basic: 31.0%, Basic: 39.0%, Proficient: 6.0%, Advanced: 0.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 24
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 24
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 13% |
State: | 24% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
41.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
13.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
33.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
13.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 291.2, Students tested: 24, Far Below Basic: 41.0%, Below Basic: 13.0%, Basic: 33.0%, Proficient: 13.0%, Advanced: 0.0%) CST Science students tested: 144
CST Science students with scores: 144
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 31% |
State: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
11.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
20.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
38.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
24.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
7.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 327.6, Students tested: 144, Far Below Basic: 11.0%, Below Basic: 20.0%, Basic: 38.0%, Proficient: 24.0%, Advanced: 7.0%)
CST Science students tested: 223
CST Science students with scores: 223
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 46% |
State: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
14.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
16.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
27.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
19.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 336.7, Students tested: 223, Far Below Basic: 14.0%, Below Basic: 16.0%, Basic: 24.0%, Proficient: 27.0%, Advanced: 19.0%)14.0%
16.0%
24.0%
27.0%
19.0%
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 56
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 55
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 33% |
State: | 27% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
10.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
22.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
35.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
20.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
13.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.:
(Mean Scale Score: 319.9, Students tested: 56, Far Below Basic: 10.0%, Below Basic: 22.0%, Basic: 35.0%, Proficient: 20.0%, Advanced: 13.0%)10.0%
22.0%
35.0%
20.0%
13.0%
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 40
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 40
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 10% |
California: | 27% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
40.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
35.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
10.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 299.0, Students tested: 40, Far Below Basic: 15.0%, Below Basic: 40.0%, Basic: 35.0%, Proficient: 10.0%, Advanced: 0.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 27
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 27
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 15% |
State: | 27% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
26.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
37.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
22.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
11.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
4.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 292.0, Students tested: 27, Far Below Basic: 26.0%, Below Basic: 37.0%, Basic: 22.0%, Proficient: 11.0%, Advanced: 4.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 11
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 11
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 0% |
California: | 27% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
82.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
0.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 258.1, Students tested: 11, Far Below Basic: 82.0%, Below Basic: 0.0%, Basic: 18.0%, Proficient: 0.0%, Advanced: 0.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 15
CMA Science students with scores: 15
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 13% |
State: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
7.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
33.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
47.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
13.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 310.3, Students tested: 15, Far Below Basic: 7.0%, Below Basic: 33.0%, Basic: 47.0%, Proficient: 13.0%, Advanced: 0.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 132, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.6%, Needs Improvement: 25.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 17.4%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 205, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 50.7%, Needs Improvement: 25.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 23.4%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 132, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.7%, Needs Improvement: 22.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 32.6%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 205, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 47.8%, Needs Improvement: 17.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 34.6%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 132, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 25.0%, Needs Improvement: 75.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 205, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.5%, Needs Improvement: 19.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 132, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 99.2%, Needs Improvement: 0.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 205, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 99.5%, Needs Improvement: 0.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 132, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.7%, Needs Improvement: 27.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 205, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.8%, Needs Improvement: 31.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 132, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.5%, Needs Improvement: 20.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 205, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.0%, Needs Improvement: 19.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 55.6%, Needs Improvement: 21.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 22.9%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 200, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.5%, Needs Improvement: 21.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 18.0%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 41.5%, Needs Improvement: 18.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 40.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 200, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.0%, Needs Improvement: 18.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 24.5%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.4%, Needs Improvement: 29.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 200, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.0%, Needs Improvement: 14.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.8%, Needs Improvement: 5.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 200, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.0%, Needs Improvement: 4.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.5%, Needs Improvement: 21.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 200, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.0%, Needs Improvement: 35.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.2%, Needs Improvement: 34.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 200, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.5%, Needs Improvement: 27.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 116, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.8%, Needs Improvement: 25.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 16.3%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 249, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 58.2%, Needs Improvement: 21.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 20.5%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 116, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.0%, Needs Improvement: 18.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 37.9%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 249, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.6%, Needs Improvement: 19.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 27.7%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 116, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.2%, Needs Improvement: 13.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 249, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.0%, Needs Improvement: 10.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 116, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.4%, Needs Improvement: 8.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 249, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.0%, Needs Improvement: 4.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 116, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.4%, Needs Improvement: 21.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 249, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.3%, Needs Improvement: 19.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 116, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.7%, Needs Improvement: 23.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 249, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.9%, Needs Improvement: 20.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 146, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.5%, Needs Improvement: 45.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 10.3%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 218, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 59.6%, Needs Improvement: 14.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 25.7%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 146, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.4%, Needs Improvement: 16.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 32.2%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 218, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.2%, Needs Improvement: 21.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 30.2%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 146, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.3%, Needs Improvement: 2.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 218, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.1%, Needs Improvement: 11.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 146, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.8%, Needs Improvement: 8.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 218, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.6%, Needs Improvement: 1.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 146, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 69.2%, Needs Improvement: 30.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 218, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.2%, Needs Improvement: 24.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 146, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 69.9%, Needs Improvement: 30.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 218, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 82.1%, Needs Improvement: 17.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 130, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 56.9%, Needs Improvement: 33.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.3%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 243, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.7%, Needs Improvement: 16.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 21.8%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 130, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 42.3%, Needs Improvement: 15.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 42.3%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 243, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.1%, Needs Improvement: 12.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 41.1%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 130, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.4%, Needs Improvement: 14.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 243, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.0%, Needs Improvement: 14.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 130, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.9%, Needs Improvement: 3.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 243, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.4%, Needs Improvement: 1.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 130, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 49.2%, Needs Improvement: 50.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 243, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.2%, Needs Improvement: 14.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 130, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.8%, Needs Improvement: 26.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 243, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.2%, Needs Improvement: 19.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 131, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 34.4%, Needs Improvement: 54.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.4%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 232, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.4%, Needs Improvement: 9.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 23.7%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 131, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 38.9%, Needs Improvement: 15.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 45.8%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 232, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.8%, Needs Improvement: 14.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 41.0%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 131, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.6%, Needs Improvement: 8.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 232, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 95.3%, Needs Improvement: 4.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 131, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.6%, Needs Improvement: 8.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 232, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.4%, Needs Improvement: 2.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 131, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 37.4%, Needs Improvement: 62.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 232, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.2%, Needs Improvement: 10.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 131, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.2%, Needs Improvement: 32.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 232, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.3%, Needs Improvement: 20.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 542
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 167
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 107
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 10.0% |
State: | 13.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 358.8 |
California: | 364.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 259.9 |
California: | 276.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 373.3 |
State: | 375.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 278.6 |
State: | 286.0 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 88
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 32
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 437.7 |
State: | 439.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 388.7 |
California: | 383.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 450.6 |
State: | 446.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 393.4 |
California: | 386.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 63
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 19
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 454.9 |
California: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 441.9 |
California: | 440.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 497.2 |
California: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 449.4 |
California: | 456.4 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 54
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 19.0% |
California: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 484.7 |
California: | 475.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 453.2 |
State: | 459.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 509.8 |
California: | 491.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 485.8 |
California: | 478.6 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 51
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 499.1 |
State: | 509.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 463.1 |
State: | 490.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 484.6 |
State: | 515.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 483.1 |
California: | 502.2 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 53
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 42.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 533.6 |
State: | 533.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 518.6 |
State: | 514.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 520.0 |
State: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 518.8 |
California: | 519.1 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 46
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 21
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 46.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 536.9 |
State: | 532.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 511.3 |
State: | 518.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 511.0 |
California: | 518.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 504.8 |
State: | 522.0 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 39
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 517.3 |
State: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 529.5 |
California: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 512.6 |
California: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.7 |
State: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 41
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 19
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 46.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 558.8 |
State: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 546.3 |
State: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 541.9 |
State: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 546.8 |
State: | 537.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 573
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 182
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 133
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 25
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 19.0% |
California: | 13.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 365.2 |
California: | 365.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 259.9 |
State: | 279.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 387.3 |
State: | 374.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 289.6 |
State: | 285.8 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 73
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 29
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
State: | 42.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 425.5 |
California: | 437.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 385.3 |
State: | 382.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 446.1 |
California: | 443.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 387.8 |
State: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 84
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 26
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 481.7 |
State: | 478.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 446.2 |
California: | 441.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 503.0 |
California: | 482.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 462.1 |
State: | 458.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 61
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 12
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 20.0% |
California: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 470.8 |
State: | 475.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 453.7 |
California: | 461.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 511.2 |
California: | 493.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 485.6 |
California: | 479.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 68
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 20
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 29.0% |
State: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 490.0 |
State: | 511.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 484.3 |
California: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 510.8 |
State: | 515.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 504.5 |
California: | 504.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 52
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 29
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 533.3 |
State: | 533.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 522.2 |
State: | 515.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 523.7 |
State: | 527.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 529.9 |
State: | 519.3 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 31
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
State: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 550.4 |
California: | 536.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 523.2 |
State: | 523.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 519.8 |
California: | 520.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 529.2 |
California: | 524.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 39
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 46.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 556.8 |
California: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 534.8 |
State: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 511.4 |
California: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 542.8 |
California: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 32
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 587.8 |
California: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 558.9 |
State: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 549.1 |
State: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 564.9 |
State: | 541.2 |
All Grades:Student Count: 594
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 214
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 103
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 10.0% |
California: | 12.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 349.2 |
California: | 362.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 274.8 |
State: | 277.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 357.3 |
California: | 373.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 296.5 |
California: | 289.5 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 94
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 47
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 438.0 |
California: | 434.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 412.5 |
California: | 380.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 469.8 |
State: | 443.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 410.9 |
California: | 386.6 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 88
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 29
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 478.1 |
California: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 452.3 |
State: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 504.9 |
California: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 475.5 |
California: | 459.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 81
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 29
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 477.0 |
State: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 465.9 |
California: | 464.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 534.7 |
State: | 494.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 492.0 |
State: | 486.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 62
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 20
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
California: | 36.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 504.6 |
State: | 509.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 482.8 |
California: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 536.8 |
California: | 515.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 496.8 |
California: | 505.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 48
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 32
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 67.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 525.3 |
State: | 535.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 532.2 |
California: | 519.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 571.8 |
State: | 532.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 544.5 |
California: | 523.7 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 33
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 543.1 |
California: | 535.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 526.5 |
California: | 521.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 543.8 |
State: | 519.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 535.1 |
California: | 522.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 36
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 569.7 |
California: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 529.5 |
State: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 555.4 |
California: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 537.6 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 49
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 578.0 |
California: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 541.7 |
State: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 563.8 |
State: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 563.9 |
State: | 541.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 633
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 208
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 112
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 9
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 8.0% |
California: | 11.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 354.6 |
State: | 358.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 276.2 |
State: | 275.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 391.0 |
California: | 365.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 296.3 |
California: | 285.3 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 91
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 34
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
California: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 428.7 |
California: | 432.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 402.9 |
State: | 380.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 452.4 |
California: | 438.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 396.1 |
State: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 99
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 33
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 483.0 |
California: | 476.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 463.9 |
State: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 479.0 |
State: | 481.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 488.6 |
California: | 461.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 74
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 14.0% |
State: | 29.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 467.0 |
State: | 478.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 457.9 |
California: | 470.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 493.0 |
California: | 494.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 489.5 |
State: | 487.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 63
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 24
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
State: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 517.2 |
State: | 512.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 516.3 |
California: | 499.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.4 |
State: | 514.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 524.6 |
California: | 509.1 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 53
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 25
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 542.4 |
California: | 534.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 523.7 |
State: | 521.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.8 |
State: | 531.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 550.2 |
State: | 525.0 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 31
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 12
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 556.7 |
California: | 538.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 522.3 |
State: | 525.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 548.4 |
State: | 522.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 541.7 |
State: | 526.2 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 59
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 32
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 54.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 539.8 |
State: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 529.5 |
State: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 553.6 |
State: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 540.8 |
State: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 51
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 29
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 57.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 582.8 |
California: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 564.8 |
California: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 576.3 |
State: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 556.3 |
California: | 545.9 |
All Grades:Student Count: 703
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 225
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 122
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 11.0% |
State: | 9.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 369.4 |
State: | 359.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 307.3 |
State: | 301.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 365.5 |
State: | 351.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 357.4 |
California: | 347.9 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 110
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 45
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 434.5 |
State: | 428.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 428.1 |
State: | 393.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 442.4 |
California: | 429.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 420.9 |
State: | 405.0 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 102
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 33
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
State: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 489.1 |
California: | 483.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 463.0 |
California: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 478.3 |
State: | 477.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 492.9 |
California: | 468.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 91
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 20.0% |
State: | 30.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 484.7 |
California: | 482.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 474.1 |
California: | 482.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 472.5 |
California: | 483.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 496.5 |
California: | 496.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 77
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 24
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 525.1 |
State: | 511.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 504.0 |
State: | 506.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 483.9 |
California: | 501.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 518.9 |
State: | 514.3 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 48
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 33
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 69.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 577.5 |
State: | 537.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 557.4 |
State: | 528.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 552.1 |
California: | 517.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 542.8 |
State: | 531.8 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 53
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 20
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 550.3 |
California: | 538.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 521.1 |
State: | 525.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 557.4 |
State: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 528.1 |
State: | 530.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 49
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 516.0 |
State: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 510.1 |
California: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 568.8 |
State: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 527.7 |
California: | 540.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 51
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 20
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 564.4 |
State: | 570.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 536.1 |
State: | 552.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 568.6 |
State: | 551.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 535.4 |
California: | 548.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 738
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 238
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 149
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 12
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 8.0% |
California: | 9.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 368.0 |
State: | 358.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 300.3 |
California: | 299.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 360.7 |
State: | 357.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 356.8 |
California: | 350.9 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 111
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 38
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 421.6 |
California: | 428.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 413.7 |
California: | 391.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 447.0 |
California: | 434.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 413.0 |
California: | 405.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 103
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 27
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
State: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 474.4 |
California: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 453.0 |
California: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 488.2 |
California: | 478.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 483.1 |
California: | 465.8 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 91
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 25
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 27.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 475.9 |
California: | 493.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 479.4 |
California: | 482.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 485.8 |
California: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 491.6 |
State: | 494.3 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 67
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 33
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 49.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 536.9 |
California: | 522.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 516.9 |
California: | 510.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 521.1 |
State: | 505.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.7 |
California: | 512.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 69
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 36
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 564.3 |
State: | 544.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 528.1 |
California: | 531.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 520.6 |
State: | 519.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 528.5 |
California: | 527.0 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 45
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 17
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 539.3 |
California: | 551.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 533.1 |
California: | 532.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 554.6 |
State: | 532.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 533.8 |
State: | 534.7 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 58
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 26
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 560.6 |
State: | 566.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 548.2 |
State: | 544.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 570.0 |
California: | 543.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 545.0 |
State: | 545.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 45
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 24
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 53.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 575.9 |
State: | 579.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 544.0 |
State: | 558.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 573.4 |
California: | 553.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 557.7 |
California: | 555.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 786
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 210
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 27.0% |
California: | 31.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 146
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 11.0% |
State: | 8.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 369.7 |
State: | 348.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 299.5 |
California: | 294.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 365.7 |
California: | 345.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 343.6 |
State: | 337.4 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 115
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 40
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 441.8 |
California: | 423.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 418.7 |
State: | 389.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 442.6 |
State: | 431.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 411.7 |
State: | 402.3 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 110
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 20
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 18.0% |
State: | 24.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 469.1 |
State: | 466.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 442.4 |
California: | 440.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 490.6 |
California: | 484.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 460.4 |
State: | 452.2 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 87
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 31
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 487.3 |
California: | 468.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 484.1 |
California: | 471.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.7 |
State: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 498.2 |
State: | 484.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 78
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 24
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
State: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 526.7 |
State: | 504.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 501.3 |
California: | 503.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 516.5 |
California: | 505.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 506.8 |
State: | 506.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 47
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
State: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 517.7 |
California: | 528.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 520.2 |
California: | 526.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 503.6 |
California: | 517.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 523.4 |
California: | 524.0 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 54
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 11.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 510.7 |
State: | 546.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 487.5 |
State: | 529.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 519.9 |
State: | 533.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 507.1 |
California: | 525.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 70
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 21
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 526.2 |
California: | 559.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 501.8 |
State: | 542.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 540.5 |
California: | 548.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 518.3 |
California: | 534.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 79
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 39
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 49.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 570.5 |
California: | 570.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 541.4 |
State: | 557.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 576.7 |
State: | 562.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 534.4 |
California: | 544.1 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Ellen Ochoa Learning Center School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 99.0% |
California: | 96.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 971 out of 979 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 906 out of 911 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 579 out of 584 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 118 out of 118 enrolled)
Math Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 96.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 970 out of 979 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 904 out of 911 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 580 out of 585 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 118 out of 118 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 11
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 95
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 99.0% |
California: | 95.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 967 out of 975 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 918 out of 924 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 530 out of 536 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 107 out of 107 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 22.6% |
State: | 42.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- SED23
- LEP8
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 23% (212 out of 930 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 23% (200 out of 887 valid scores)
- English Learners: 8% (38 out of 504 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (4 out of 101 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 94.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 968 out of 978 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 919 out of 926 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 530 out of 538 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 108 out of 108 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic15
- SED15
- LEP8
- With Disabilities3
- Hispanic: 15% (142 out of 930 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 15% (134 out of 887 valid scores)
- English Learners: 8% (39 out of 503 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 3% (3 out of 102 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,150 out of 1,152 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,167 out of 1,169 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 573 out of 574 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 133 out of 135 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 35.9% |
State: | 55.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic36
- SED36
- LEP24
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 36% (389 out of 1,092 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 36% (396 out of 1,106 valid scores)
- English Learners: 24% (128 out of 543 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (15 out of 127 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,151 out of 1,152 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,168 out of 1,169 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 574 out of 574 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 134 out of 135 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 40.4% |
California: | 59.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic40
- SED40
- LEP34
- With Disabilities13
- Hispanic: 40% (442 out of 1,093 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (447 out of 1,107 valid scores)
- English Learners: 34% (187 out of 544 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (17 out of 128 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 10
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,186 out of 1,186 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,078 out of 1,078 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 742 out of 742 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 131 out of 131 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic39
- White55
- SED39
- LEP25
- With Disabilities7
- Hispanic: 39% (436 out of 1,127 valid scores)
- White: 55% (6 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 39% (399 out of 1,032 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (179 out of 711 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (9 out of 121 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,185 out of 1,185 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,077 out of 1,077 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 741 out of 741 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 130 out of 130 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 41.7% |
California: | 59.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic42
- White55
- SED42
- LEP34
- With Disabilities13
- Hispanic: 42% (469 out of 1,127 valid scores)
- White: 55% (6 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 42% (435 out of 1,032 valid scores)
- English Learners: 34% (240 out of 711 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (16 out of 121 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,294 out of 1,299 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,314 out of 1,319 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 826 out of 827 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 145 out of 145 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic36
- SED36
- LEP25
- With Disabilities15
- Hispanic: 36% (440 out of 1,224 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 36% (448 out of 1,241 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (195 out of 787 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 15% (21 out of 137 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,293 out of 1,299 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,313 out of 1,319 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 826 out of 827 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 145 out of 145 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic42
- SED42
- LEP36
- With Disabilities20
- Hispanic: 42% (517 out of 1,224 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 42% (526 out of 1,241 valid scores)
- English Learners: 36% (285 out of 787 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 20% (28 out of 137 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,473 out of 1,475 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,494 out of 1,496 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,012 out of 1,013 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 167 out of 167 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 34.7% |
California: | 53.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic34
- SED35
- LEP25
- With Disabilities11
- Hispanic: 34% (472 out of 1,375 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 35% (484 out of 1,393 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (237 out of 962 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 11% (17 out of 159 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,471 out of 1,475 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,492 out of 1,496 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,011 out of 1,013 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 167 out of 167 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 41.5% |
State: | 57.1% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic41
- SED42
- LEP34
- With Disabilities16
- Hispanic: 41% (566 out of 1,373 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 42% (578 out of 1,391 valid scores)
- English Learners: 34% (322 out of 961 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 16% (25 out of 159 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,507 out of 1,511 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,526 out of 1,530 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,050 out of 1,053 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 155 out of 156 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 31.6% |
State: | 52.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic31
- White56
- SED32
- LEP22
- With Disabilities10
- Hispanic: 31% (442 out of 1,414 valid scores)
- White: 56% (9 out of 16 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 32% (455 out of 1,438 valid scores)
- English Learners: 22% (217 out of 1,007 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 10% (15 out of 149 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,506 out of 1,511 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,525 out of 1,530 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,049 out of 1,053 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 155 out of 156 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic39
- White63
- SED40
- LEP32
- With Disabilities22
- Hispanic: 39% (557 out of 1,413 valid scores)
- White: 63% (10 out of 16 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (572 out of 1,437 valid scores)
- English Learners: 32% (322 out of 1,006 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 22% (33 out of 149 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.1% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,480 out of 1,480 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,380 out of 1,380 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,080 out of 1,080 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 170 out of 170 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 27.6% |
California: | 48.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic27
- White35
- SED27
- LEP21
- With Disabilities5
- Hispanic: 27% (384 out of 1,409 valid scores)
- White: 35% (6 out of 17 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (352 out of 1,315 valid scores)
- English Learners: 21% (217 out of 1,037 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 5% (8 out of 163 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,478 out of 1,480 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,378 out of 1,380 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,079 out of 1,080 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 170 out of 170 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 34.7% |
California: | 52.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic34
- White47
- SED35
- LEP29
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 34% (485 out of 1,409 valid scores)
- White: 47% (8 out of 17 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 35% (456 out of 1,315 valid scores)
- English Learners: 29% (303 out of 1,037 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (7 out of 163 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 14
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,524 out of 1,528 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,407 out of 1,411 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,102 out of 1,105 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 165 out of 166 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic22
- White19
- SED21
- LEP16
- With Disabilities2
- Hispanic: 22% (310 out of 1,416 valid scores)
- White: 19% (3 out of 16 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 21% (268 out of 1,309 valid scores)
- English Learners: 16% (169 out of 1,043 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 2% (3 out of 159 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,524 out of 1,528 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,407 out of 1,411 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,102 out of 1,105 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 165 out of 166 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 29.7% |
State: | 50.5% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic30
- White31
- SED29
- LEP25
- With Disabilities3
- Hispanic: 30% (420 out of 1,416 valid scores)
- White: 31% (5 out of 16 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 29% (383 out of 1,309 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (262 out of 1,043 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 3% (5 out of 159 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,471 out of 1,476 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,355 out of 1,359 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,071 out of 1,073 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 155 out of 155 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 18.2% |
State: | 45.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic18
- White33
- SED18
- LEP14
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 18% (246 out of 1,360 valid scores)
- White: 33% (4 out of 12 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 18% (220 out of 1,257 valid scores)
- English Learners: 14% (139 out of 1,015 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (5 out of 139 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 99.0% |
State: | 97.5% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,466 out of 1,475 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,350 out of 1,358 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,068 out of 1,073 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 155 out of 155 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- White25
- SED26
- LEP22
- With Disabilities7
- White: 25% (3 out of 12 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 26% (326 out of 1,253 valid scores)
- English Learners: 22% (227 out of 1,012 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (9 out of 139 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 100.0% |
State: | 99.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,354 out of 1,355 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,379 out of 1,380 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 997 out of 997 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 137 out of 138 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 14.1% |
State: | 44.5% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic14
- SED14
- LEP12
- With Disabilities1
- Hispanic: 14% (174 out of 1,229 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 14% (176 out of 1,251 valid scores)
- English Learners: 12% (116 out of 954 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 1% (1 out of 124 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,353 out of 1,355 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,378 out of 1,380 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 996 out of 997 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 137 out of 138 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic20
- SED20
- LEP19
- With Disabilities5
- Hispanic: 20% (244 out of 1,228 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 20% (249 out of 1,250 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (182 out of 953 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 5% (6 out of 124 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Referrals and Arrests:
(State average from 2,295 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 5 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic187
- Native Hawaiian2
- Black4
- White2
- LEP70
- IDEA28
- 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 195 (male: 96, female: 99)
- Hispanic: 187 (male: 92, female: 95)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all female)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 70 (male: 38, female: 32)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 28 (male: 17, female: 11)
- Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsEllen Ochoa Learning Center School: | 136.8 |
State: | 172.7 |
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 118 (male: 65, female: 53)
- Hispanic: 118 (male: 65, female: 53)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 46 (male: 26, female: 20)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Suspensions:
(State average from 1,406 schools)
Out-of-school suspension - For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
- For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision. School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 5 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 1
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 11 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 5
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 5 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Classes & Courses
Algebra I:
(State average from 1,382 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
Number of Algebra I classes: 3
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I
- Hispanic91
- Black2
- White2
- LEP4
- IDEA4
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 95 (male: 47, female: 48)
- Hispanic: 91 (male: 47, female: 44)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 77 (male: 31, female: 46)
- Hispanic: 77 (male: 31, female: 46)
Percent of 7-8th grade students who passedHere: | 81.1% |
California: | 83.6% |
Number of Algebra I classes: 3
Geometry:
Geometry is a (college-preparatory) course that typically includes topics such as properties of plane and solid figures; deductive methods of reasoning and use of logic; geometry as an axiomatic system including the study of postulates, theorems, and formal proofs; concepts of congruence, similarity, parallelism, perpendicularity, and proportion; and rules of angle measurement in triangles.Geometry is considered a prerequisite for Algebra II.
Number of Geometry classes: 1
Student Enrollment in Geometry
- Hispanic13
- Asian2
- White2
- IDEA2
Student Enrollment in Geometry: 17 (male: 5, female: 12)
- Hispanic: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: