Ewes - E-How-Kee Camp. School in Clearwater, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 21.

100 N STARCREST DR
Clearwater, FL 33765

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Disston Gifted Center School (14.5 miles):

98
Bay Vista Fundamental Elementary School (18.4 miles):

73
Oldsmar Elementary School (7.0 miles):

58
Lakeview Fundamental Elementary School (15.9 miles):

48
Pinellas Park Middle School (9.1 miles):

39
Modesta Robbins Partnership School (5.1 miles):

30
Ewes - E-How-Kee Camp. School:

21
Melrose Elementary School (15.5 miles):

18
Pace Center For Girls School (9.1 miles):

0
Ewes - E-How-Kee Camp. School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pinellas County:

51
Clearwater:

44
Ewes - E-How-Kee Camp. School:

21

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 461-2990 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 7121
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 4 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Residential
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Principal: Keith Philipson
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 50
Senate District: 13

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 5 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 5 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

90%
State average from 5 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

36%
State average from 5 schools:

56%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 5 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 5 schools:

77%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 5 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 5 schools:

70%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

538
State average from 5 schools:

581
Percent Tested
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

99%
State average from 5 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

51%
State average from 6 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 6 schools:

73%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2096 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2076 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1065
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2012
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1944

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1998
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1935
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1799 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1779 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 917
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1724
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1663

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1710
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1652
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1084 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1072 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 515
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1026
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1003

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1018
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 997
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 203 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 196 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 175 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 7 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 5 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 5 schools:

89%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

44%
State average from 5 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 5 schools:

68%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 5 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 5 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 5 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

532
State average from 5 schools:

579
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 5 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

41%
State average from 5 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 6 schools:

62%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2202 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2185 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1134
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2125
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2057

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2032
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 167

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 168
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1895 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1880 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 982
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1827
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1772

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1806
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1750
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 881 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 872 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 440
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 832
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 813

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 821
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 802
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 176
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 119
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 5 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 5 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 6 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

41%
State average from 5 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 5 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 5 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 5 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 5 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

524
State average from 5 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 5 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 6 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 6 schools:

64%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2208 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2172 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1099
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2051

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2016
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1921 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1891 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 967
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1873
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1790

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1842
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1762
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 870 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 850 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 444
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 840
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 810

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 821
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 791
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 233 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 105
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 207
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (91%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (94%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1967
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1990
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1978
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2026
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

705
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

71
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

13
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

711
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1,118
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

306
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Clearwater, FL
  5. Ewes - E-How-Kee Camp. School in Clearwater, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.