Lakeview Fundamental Elementary School in St Petersburg, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 48.

2229 25TH ST S
St Petersburg, FL 33712

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Disston Gifted Center School (2.3 miles):

98
Gorrie Elementary School (18.0 miles):

71
John M. Sexton Elementary School (5.2 miles):

59
Bradenton Charter School (19.3 miles):

49
Lakeview Fundamental Elementary School:

48
Elementary J(Plant City Area) School (19.2 miles):

37
Orange Ridge-Bullock Elementary School (19.9 miles):

29
Melrose Elementary School (0.9 miles):

20
Meacham Alternative School (19.5 miles):

0
Lakeview Fundamental Elementary School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
St Petersburg:

45
Lakeview Fundamental Elementary:

48

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 893-2139 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 1961
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 893-1359
Magnet School.
Principal: Charlene Einsel
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 55
Senate District: 18
School Web Address: http://www.lakeview-es.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 734 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 734 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 734 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

34%
State average from 733 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 734 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 733 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 734 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 734 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

520
State average from 734 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 733 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 734 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 735 schools:

46%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 960 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 960 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 280
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 943
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 931

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 944
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 932
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 142
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 476
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 470

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 476
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 470
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 253
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 253
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 676 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 676 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 193
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 665
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 657

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 665
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 657
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 735 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

55%
State average from 734 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 734 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

27%
State average from 734 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 735 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 735 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

67%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

506
State average from 734 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 734 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

66%
State average from 734 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 734 schools:

45%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 972 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 971 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 287
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 935
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 903

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 934
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 902
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 474 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 473 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 460
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 439

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 459
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 438
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 182 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 270 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 270 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 257
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 257
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 641 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 640 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 182
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 614
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 596

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 613
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 596
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 711 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

49%
State average from 711 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 711 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

32%
State average from 711 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 711 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 711 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 711 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 711 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

481
State average from 711 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 711 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 711 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

48%
State average from 711 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 910 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 911 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 283
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 870
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 850

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 872
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 851
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 476 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 477 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 161
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 455
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 442

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 456
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 442
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 175 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 175 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 207

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 595 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 595 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 176
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 571
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 560

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 573
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 562
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 652 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 652 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 652 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

67%
State average from 650 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

84%
State average from 652 schools:

72%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 652 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 652 schools:

67%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 652 schools:

69%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

653
State average from 652 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 652 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 655 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 655 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

87%
State average from 643 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 643 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 643 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 643 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 643 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 643 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

456
State average from 643 schools:

420
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 643 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

21%
State average from 644 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

36%
State average from 644 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 49
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 149
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 149
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

87%
State average from 631 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 631 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 631 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 631 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

487
State average from 631 schools:

417
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 631 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

22%
State average from 631 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 631 schools:

52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1644
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

6%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

24%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1812
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

37%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1888
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

47%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

12
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1718
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1884
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

356
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

18%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

11
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1617
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

368
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

31%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1715
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

49%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

100%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1813
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

364
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

50%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1694
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

1796
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1891
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1555
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1773
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

352
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1807
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

1690
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1770
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1865
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

329
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1593
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1718
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

360
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1796
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

360
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1664
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1787
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1861
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 64
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 301
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1623
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1751
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1789
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1670
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1748
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1846
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

302
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1631
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

371
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1820
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1642
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1753
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1847
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

54
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

80
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

64
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

82
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

46
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

83
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

329
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

63
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

306
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

67
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

292
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 64
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

350
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 80%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 292
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

299
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 49%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1542
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1761
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1761
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1594
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 167

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1801
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1805
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1686
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 119

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

333
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

1489
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1615
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1615
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1518
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 97

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1780
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1778
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1636
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 142

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 55
Mean Scale Score
LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY:

657
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 45
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 80
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 45
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 87
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 55
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 45
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 10
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 45
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 89
Number Sense (max 12): 11
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 46
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

330
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 93%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.