Excel Alternative School in Bushnell, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 63.

841 E COUNTY RD 48
Bushnell, FL 33513

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Villages Charter Middle School (19.0 miles):

88
Villages Charter School (19.2 miles):

68
Excel Alternative School:

63
Oak Park Middle School (14.1 miles):

51
South Sumter High School (3.8 miles):

43
Gray Middle School (13.8 miles):

33
South Sumter Middle School (2.1 miles):

27
Ewes - E-Nini-Hassee Camp School (17.4 miles):

4
Excel Alternative School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Sumter County:

47
Bushnell:

43
Excel Alternative School:

63

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (352) 568-7226 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 60
School number: 3001
School type: Senior High
District Name: SUMTER
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 568-7693
Principal: Sharon Jones
The function/setting of the school: Alternative to Expulsion
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 5
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 44
Senate District: 15

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 133 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

54%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

68%
State average from 133 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 132 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

74%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

587
State average from 133 schools:

522
Percent Tested
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

100%
State average from 132 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 137 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 137 schools:

53%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 141 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 139 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

56%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 136 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 133 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

596
State average from 133 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 134 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 132 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 139 schools:

52%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

73%
State average from 124 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

76%
State average from 124 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 125 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

52%
State average from 122 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 122 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

74%
State average from 122 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 122 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 122 schools:

70%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

560
State average from 122 schools:

535
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 124 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 126 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 125 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

1734
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

303
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1676
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

53%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

6%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

1748
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

43%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

235
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

76%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1648
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1667
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

53%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

6%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1785
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

57%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

24%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

24%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1682
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1776
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

3
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

6
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

20
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

24
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS:

3
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Bushnell, FL
  5. Excel Alternative School in Bushnell, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.