Excel Alternatives North School in Wildwood, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 21.

407 ST. CLAIR STREET
Wildwood, FL 34785

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Withlachoochee Technical Insti School (19.2 miles):

96
Villages Charter School (4.8 miles):

68
Lake Weir High School (15.2 miles):

55
Lake Hills School (19.2 miles):

42
South Sumter High School (13.8 miles):

38
Belleview Middle School (15.1 miles):

30
Milestones Community Of Lake County, Inc. School (15.0 miles):

24
Excel Alternatives North School:

21
Excel Alternatives North School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Sumter County:

47
Wildwood:

34
Excel Alternatives North School:

21

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (352) 586-7226 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 60
School number: 3005
School type: Senior High
District Name: SUMTER
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Principal: Sharon Jones

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (85%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Results


2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1733
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1638
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1786
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
EXCEL ALTERNATIVES NORTH:

7
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

630
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

10
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

5
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
EXCEL ALTERNATIVES NORTH:

3
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
EXCEL ALTERNATIVES NORTH:

9
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

235
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 10%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 60%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1771
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1762
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1748
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 14

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1924
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1945
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1842
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 103

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 43
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
EXCEL ALTERNATIVES NORTH:

690
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 48
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

713
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
EXCEL ALTERNATIVES NORTH:

707
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

280
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 20%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 70%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 60%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.