Lake Hills School in Howey-in-the-Hills, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 42.

909 S LAKESHORE BLVD
Howey-in-the-Hills, FL 34737

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Sumter County Adult Center School (17.5 miles):

93
Sumter Alternative School (17.5 miles):

63
Tildenville Elementary School (13.9 miles):

58
Mascotte Elementary School (11.4 miles):

51
Lake Hills School:

42
Spring Lake Elementary School (16.7 miles):

42
Milestones Community Of Lake County, Inc. School (9.9 miles):

33
Excel Alternatives North School (19.2 miles):

21
Lake Hills School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Lake County County:

42
Howey-in-the-Hills:

42
Lake Hills School:

42

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (352) 324-3175 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 35
School number: 533
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: LAKE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 324-3654
Principal: Robin Meyers
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 5
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
Senate District: 20
School Web Address: http://lake.k12.fl.us/lhe

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE HILLS SCHOOL:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE HILLS SCHOOL:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE HILLS SCHOOL:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
LAKE HILLS SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE HILLS SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (78%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (83%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 42
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKE HILLS SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKE HILLS SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 42

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKE HILLS SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKE HILLS SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Howey-in-the-Hills, FL
  5. Lake Hills School in Howey-in-the-Hills, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.