Excel Professional Academy School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 3.

6125 N ORANGE BLOSSOM TRL
Orlando, FL 32810

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (5.6 miles):

98
Millennium Middle School (12.7 miles):

68
Lakeview Middle School (11.1 miles):

59
South Creek Middle School (16.0 miles):

53
Apopka Middle School (7.1 miles):

35
Hopper Center School (16.8 miles):

18
Kissimmee Charter Academy School (19.8 miles):

9
Excel Professional Academy School:

3
Excel Professional Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Excel Professional Academy School:

3

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 650-4034 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 766
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 317-3630
Principal: Tiffany Ward
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 38
Senate District: 19

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

17%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

15%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

3%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

39%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

37%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

40%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

278
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

95%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: NO

Grade in 2009: F

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

24%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

20%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

74%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

3%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

41%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

327
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

31%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

21%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

8%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

428
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

94%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

24%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

18%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

81%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

51%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

49%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

276
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

80%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 38
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 84
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 84
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 50
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 50
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 61
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

18%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

18%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

69%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

267
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

66%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 70
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 209 Results


2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1346
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1680
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1729
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

1399
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1680
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

279
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1775
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

23
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

637
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

32
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

33
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

50
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

62
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

42
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

244
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 15%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1411
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 46%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1394
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1365
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 28

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1647
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 62%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1672
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1608
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1738
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 47%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1750
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1723
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 27

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

258
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1357
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 46%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

1319
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1403
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -83

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1637
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 62%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1632
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1544
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 89

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1788
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

293
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 47%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1825
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1722
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 103

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale Score
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

623
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 22
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 39
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale Score
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

673
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale Score
Here:

635
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 30
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 39
Mean Scale Score
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

646
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale Score
EXCEL SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY:

681
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 55
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 75
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

258
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 15%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 49%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 89%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.