Forest Park Elementary School in Boynton Beach, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 34.

1201 SW 3RD ST
Boynton Beach, FL 33435

Show street view No street view available for this location
Forest Park Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
Boynton Beach:

34
Forest Park Elementary School:

34

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 292-6900 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 831
School type: Elementary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 292-2950
Magnet School.
Principal: Susan Matuella
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 86
Senate District: 29
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Forest_Park_ES

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 734 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 734 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

71%
State average from 734 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

22%
State average from 733 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 734 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 733 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 734 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 734 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

495
State average from 734 schools:

543
Percent Tested
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 733 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 734 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 735 schools:

46%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 267 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 267 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 99
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 254 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 254 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 735 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 734 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 734 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

33%
State average from 734 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 735 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 735 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

428
State average from 734 schools:

557
Percent Tested
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 734 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 734 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 734 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 226 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 226 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 209
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 209
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 207
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 201

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 711 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 711 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 711 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

21%
State average from 711 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 711 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 711 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 711 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 711 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

481
State average from 711 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 711 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 711 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 711 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 204 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 204 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 184

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 185
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 652 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 652 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 652 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 650 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 652 schools:

72%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 652 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 652 schools:

67%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 652 schools:

69%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

519
State average from 652 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 652 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 655 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 655 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 393 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 394 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 127
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 380
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 381
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 246 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 246 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 237
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 237
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 296 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 89
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 289
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 290
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 643 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 643 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 643 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 643 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 643 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 643 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

408
State average from 643 schools:

420
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 643 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 644 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 644 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 437 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 437 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 119
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 414
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 415
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 272 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 272 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 74

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 253
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 253
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 30

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 109
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 110
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 309 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 309 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 90

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 290
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 291
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 631 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 631 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 631 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 631 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

418
State average from 631 schools:

417
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 631 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

63%
State average from 631 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 631 schools:

52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1142
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1365
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1349
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1842
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1837
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

43%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

46%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

42%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

16%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1327
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1455
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1411
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

39%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

23%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1870
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1921
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

68%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

57%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1149
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1300
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1492
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1847
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1237
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

286
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1351
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1540
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1863
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1883
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 61
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 223
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1017
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1421
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1354
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1801
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1827
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1169
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1528
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1488
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1848
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1914
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

70
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

591
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

25
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

57
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

61
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

77
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

640
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

47
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

197
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

681
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

49
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

214
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

688
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

46
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 56
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

290
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 54%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 230
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

262
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1237
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1478
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1480
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1349
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 131

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1559
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1562
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1501
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 61

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1379
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1536
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1537
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1427
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 109

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1674
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1689
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1549
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 140

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 139
Mean Scale Score
Here:

621
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 132
Mean Scale Score
Here:

630
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 126
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 138
Mean Scale Score
FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

626
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 132
Mean Scale Score
Here:

646
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 126
Mean Scale Score
Here:

661
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 131
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

292
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 78%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.