City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 56.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Gateway Environmental K-8 Learning Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
| Homestead: | 40 |
| This School: | 56 |
1
adrianna
Jul 19, 2011 @ 6:18 pm
i need to know when school opens the date i mean and also do i have to provide lunch for my child. or does the school.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 13
School number: 4031
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 257-6001
Principal: Carmen G Gutierrez
School Web Address: http://www.mila.brevard.k12.fl.us
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 59% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 515 |
| State average from 54 schools: | 539 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 60% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 92% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 57% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 253 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 253 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 115
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 218
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 225 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 89% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 89% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 69% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 654 |
| State average from 52 schools: | 566 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 100% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 64% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 55% |
Minority Rate
Region: 3| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 179 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 179 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 571 |
| State average from 51 schools: | 545 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 81% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 87% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 659 |
| State average from 43 schools: | 531 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 35% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 57% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 413 |
| State average from 44 schools: | 418 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 100% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 65% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 80% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 62% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 444 |
| State average from 43 schools: | 400 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 33% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 55% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1204 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 284 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1470 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1617 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 304 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 68% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1873 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 85% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 322 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 54% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1328 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 306 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 32% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 1529 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 63% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1666 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 64% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1871 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 356 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 12% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 85% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1438 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 323 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1637 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 09%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 1742 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1784 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1546 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1597 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1761 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1811 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 45
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1517 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1642 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 330 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1584 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1843 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 1514 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1668 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 349 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1627 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 324 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1830 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 346 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 42 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 643 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 69 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 51 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 663 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 78 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 34 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 661 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 67 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 39 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 691 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 80 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 48
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%| Here: | 293 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1455 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 326 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1477 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1498 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 222| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 1276 |
| State average: | 1397 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1653 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 1695 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 240| Here: | 1455 |
| State average: | 1532 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1715 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 312 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1735 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 109| Here: | 1626 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1548 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 354 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1464 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1470 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 151| Here: | 1319 |
| State average: | 1414 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1623 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1638 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 241| Here: | 1397 |
| State average: | 1519 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1726 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1749 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 104| Here: | 1645 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 49
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 68| Here: | 641 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 44
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 58| Here: | 639 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 40
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 73| GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K-8 LEARNING CENTER: | 667 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 46
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 70| Here: | 678 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 49
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 78| Here: | 645 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 44
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 71| Here: | 646 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 40
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 71| Here: | 661 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 46
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 74| Here: | 680 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 40%| Here: | 260 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 29%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 50%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 31%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.