City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
43.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Region High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Florida: | 45 |
| Polk County: | 41 |
| Eagle Lake: | 37 |
| Lake Region High School: | 43 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (863) 297-3099 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 1991
School type: Senior High
District Name: POLK
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 297-3097
Principal: Joel Mcguire
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 66
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://www.lakeregionthunder.com/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 47% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 44% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 460 |
| State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1010 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1009 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 460
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 884
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 880
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 500 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 500 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 250
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 438
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 436
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 210 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 209 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 258 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 229
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 620 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 621 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 546
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 543
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 48% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 50% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 458 |
| State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 983 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 981 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 856
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 852
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 501 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 499 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 423
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 422
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 206 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 206 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 187
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 242 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 242 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 216
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 216
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 527 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 526 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 472
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 467
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 40% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 34% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 49% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 42% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 467 |
| State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1078 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1079 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 939
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 936
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 578 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 578 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 510
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 510
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 233 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 196
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 194
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 233 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 202
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 202
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 524 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 525 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 450
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 448
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (92%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 41% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 52% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 49% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns| Here: | 613 |
| State average from 370 schools: | 482 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 34% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1279 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1279 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 846 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 846 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 262 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 262 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 240 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 79% |
| State average from 360 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 95% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 77% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 75% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| Here: | 475 |
| State average from 361 schools: | 374 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 47% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1220 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1220 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 837 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 837 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 230 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 205 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 205 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 42% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 51% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| Here: | 443 |
| State average from 348 schools: | 371 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 347 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 45% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1475 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 78% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1698 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 21 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1723 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 10% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 38% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 79% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1872 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 7% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 39% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 83% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1957 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 83% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1886 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1940 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 35% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 54% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 3% |
| State average: | 5% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1532 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 350 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 84% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 1689 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 93% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1726 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 72% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1830 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 78% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1955 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 85% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1909 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1985 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing| Here: | 80% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 67% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1427 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1596 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 04%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1763 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1841 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 335 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1893 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1978 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1900 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1919 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1519 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 347 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1605 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1777 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 356 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1836 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1915 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1994 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1934 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 305 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 1965 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 98
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 473
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 456
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1803 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 328 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1899 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1950 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1865 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 301 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1919 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1792 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1934 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 342 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1989 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 1911 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1976 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 393 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 685 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 469 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 699 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 392 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 704 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 526 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 691 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 59 |
| State average: | 61 |
Informational (max 18)| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 11 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 500 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 708 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Informational (max 18)| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 386
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 321 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 526
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 302 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 51%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1839 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 1852 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1748 |
| State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 104
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 1895 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1913 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1835 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 78
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1941 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1948 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1886 |
| State average: | 1738 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 62
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1804 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1818 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1769 |
| State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 49
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 1910 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 336 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1928 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1821 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 107
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1990 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1997 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1903 |
| State average: | 1755 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 94
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 455
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 692 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 80
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 382
Mean Scale Score| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 694 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Median NPR: 77
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 440
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 708 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 455
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 694 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 82
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 382
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 710 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 440
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 725 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Median NPR: 86
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 440
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 316 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 62%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined| LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 91%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Eagle Lake, FL
- Lake Region High School in Eagle Lake, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: