City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 38.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Tarpon Springs Fundamental Ele School (5.8 miles): | 97 |
| Bay Crest Elementary School (10.6 miles): | 74 |
| Largo Central Elementary School (10.1 miles): | 62 |
| Tarpon Springs Elementary School (6.6 miles): | 53 |
| Trinity For Children - Lower Division School (15.8 miles): | 41 |
| Lake St. George Elementary School: | 38 |
| Village Of Excellence Academy School (19.6 miles): | 30 |
| Robles Elementary School (19.9 miles): | 19 |
Lake St. George Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Pinellas County: | 51 |
| Palm Harbor: | 66 |
| Lake St. George Elementary School: | 38 |
1
Dan Lee
Oct 11, 2012 @ 7:07 am
Does this school have a junior Robatics club. If so what days and times does it meet.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 52
School number: 6281
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 669-1165
Principal: Diane Cato
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 48
Senate District: 11
School Web Address: http://www.lsg-es.pinellas.k12.fl.us
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 573 |
| State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 257 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 257 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 242
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 242
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 86% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 561 |
| State average from 959 schools: | 560 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 288 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 286 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 249
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 217 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 216 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 89% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 56% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 554 |
| State average from 954 schools: | 544 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 97% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 279 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 284
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 10% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 43% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 439 |
| State average from 862 schools: | 539 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 865 schools: | 58% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 865 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 656 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 653 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 561 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 469 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 467 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (81%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 62% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 364 |
| State average from 848 schools: | 413 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 58% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 890 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 891 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 767 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 768 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 679 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 680 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 130
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 74% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 327 |
| State average from 834 schools: | 412 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Minority Rate
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 98% |
| State average from 832 schools: | 54% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1503 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 333 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 19 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1693 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 83% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 21 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1723 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 323 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 27% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 80% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1440 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 262 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 25% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1640 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 285 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1740 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 279 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 36% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 26% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 258 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 55% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1575 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 360 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1662 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 38% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 87% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1746 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 349 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 78% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1480 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 265 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 18% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 23% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1694 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 282 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1784 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 28% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1550 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1694 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 07%| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1633 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1519 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%| Here: | 277 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1576 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%| Here: | 273 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1775 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1814 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%| Here: | 257 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1647 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 375 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1639 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1680 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 335 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1550 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%| Here: | 281 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1678 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%| Here: | 279 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1823 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1907 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 94
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 176
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 2| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1492 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1630 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1720 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1472 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%| Here: | 268 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1608 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%| Here: | 279 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1723 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1766 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%| Here: | 283 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 257 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1558 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 356 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1580 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1732 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1535 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1725 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1821 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1891 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 292 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 95 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 646 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 72 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 95 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 73 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 104 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 680 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 82 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 104 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 639 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 33 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 11 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 174 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 656 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 44 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 165 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 661 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 39 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 168 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 673 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 41 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 96
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%| Here: | 304 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 166
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 47%| Here: | 242 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 12%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1658 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%| Here: | 288 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1668 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 86| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1582 |
| State average: | 1668 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1679 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%| Here: | 267 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1689 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 72| Here: | 1617 |
| State average: | 1738 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1731 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%| Here: | 277 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1744 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 74| Here: | 1670 |
| State average: | 1779 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 247 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1747 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1758 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 189| Here: | 1568 |
| State average: | 1645 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1798 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1822 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 93| Here: | 1729 |
| State average: | 1755 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1862 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 284 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1870 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 101| LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1769 |
| State average: | 1821 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 163
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 45| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 239
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 40| Here: | 662 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 225
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 47| Here: | 679 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 163
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 59| Here: | 672 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 239
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 58| Here: | 685 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 223
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 62| Here: | 699 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 239
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 54%| Here: | 239 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 14%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 74%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 55%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.