Lakeland Highlands Middle School in Lakeland, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 63.

740 LAKE MIRIAM DR
Lakeland, FL 33813

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Union Academy School (9.5 miles):	91
Lakeland Highlands Middle School:	63
Mckeel Academy Of Technology School (5.6 miles):	61
Berkley Accelerated Middle School (14.3 miles):	50
Denison Middle School (14.3 miles):	41
Lake Gibson Middle School (10.7 miles):	36
Sleepy Hill Middle School (8.5 miles):	24
Compass Middle Charter School (9.4 miles):	12
Sabal Palm School (16.0 miles):	0

Lakeland Highlands Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Polk County:	41
Lakeland:	44
Lakeland Highlands Middle School:	63

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (863) 648-3500 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 1771
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: POLK
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 648-3580
Principal: Donna Drisdom
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 63
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://schools.polk-fl.net/LHMS

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	77%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	86%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	54%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	63%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	60%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	553
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	41%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	33%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 4

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1290 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1289 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 373
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1218
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1168

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1218
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 866 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 866 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 258
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 836
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 795

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 836
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 795
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 197 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 154 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 531 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 530 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 132
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 479
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 464

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 479
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 462
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	76%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	91%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	53%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	61%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	557
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	35%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	32%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1250 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1249 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 391
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1182
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1126
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 860 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 860 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 279
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 832
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 799

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 832
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 796
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 423 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 422 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 378
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 360

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 378
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 357
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	71%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	52%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	64%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	74%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	59%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	553
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	30%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	33%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1250 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1248 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 395
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1185
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 846 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 845 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 278
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 817
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 769

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 815
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 769
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 373 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 373 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 336
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 335
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 154 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	23%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	92%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	88%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	79%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	70%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	81%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

Making Math Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	76%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	70%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	630
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	22%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	47%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 527 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 527 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 182
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 491
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 491
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 269 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 269 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 255
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 255
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1602
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	5%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	50%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	15%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	89%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	20
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1777
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	39%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	21%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	88%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	22
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1742
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1918
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	33%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	16%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1913
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	18%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	20%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	59%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1809
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	42%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	19%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	8%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	29%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	10
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1800
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	32%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	58%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	12%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	15%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	315
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	26%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	27%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	46%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	29%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	5%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	2%
State average:	1%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	36%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1678
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	382
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	4%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	13%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	45%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	37%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	96%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1747
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	367
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	45%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	25%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	92%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1698
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	56%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1857
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	69%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1926
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1913
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1969
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	74%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	59%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1520
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1709
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1814
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	339
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1782
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1847
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1931
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1784
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	286
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1875
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	346
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	274
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1626
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	371
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1655
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1759
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	352
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1757
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1836
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1926
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1910
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1998
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 134

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 416

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 125

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1528
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1634
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1743
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1729
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1869
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1931
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1786
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	287
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1770
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	271
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	259
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1601
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	365
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1594
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1774
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1699
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1843
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	319
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1936
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1930
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1955
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	217
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	649
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	74
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	194
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	660
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	75
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	206
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	680
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	82
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	410
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	678
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	69
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	423
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	698
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	79
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	412
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	702
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	76
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	142
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	682
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	50
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	6
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	152
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	692
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	50
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 196

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	311
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 66%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 410

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	298
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 43%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 162

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	268
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 29%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1473
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1642
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1676
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1541
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 135

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1802
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	337
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1811
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1692
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 119

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1502
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1622
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1653
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1594
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 59

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1793
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	359
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1804
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1666
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 138

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 171

Mean Scale Score

Here:	651
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 199

Mean Scale Score

Here:	653
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 161

Mean Scale Score

LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	689
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 87
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 171

Mean Scale Score

Here:	640
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 74
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 199

Mean Scale Score

Here:	660
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 81
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 161

Mean Scale Score

Here:	686
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 197

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	305
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 74%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI