Lakeland Montessori House School in Lakeland, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 78.

837 E PARKER
Lakeland, FL 33801

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bartow Elementary Academy School (12.8 miles):

93
Lakeland Montessori House School:

78
Elbert Elementary School (15.1 miles):

63
Carlton Palmore Elementary School (3.9 miles):

54
Lena Vista Elementary School (8.3 miles):

45
Socrum Elementary School (9.2 miles):

37
James E. Stephens Elementary School (11.2 miles):

30
Crystal Lake Elementary School (2.4 miles):

24
Lakeland Montessori House School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Polk County:

41
Lakeland:

44
Lakeland Montessori House School:

78

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 413-0003 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 8141
School type: Elementary
District Name: POLK
Grade range: GRADES K TO 4
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 709-9707
Principal: Josie Zinninger
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 64
Senate District: 15

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

98%
State average from 5 schools:

90%
Meeting High Standards in Math
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

100%
State average from 5 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 5 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

82%
State average from 5 schools:

75%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 5 schools:

73%
Making Math Gains
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

76%
State average from 5 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 5 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 5 schools:

71%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

654
State average from 5 schools:

622
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 5 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 5 schools:

33%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 5 schools:

27%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

96%
State average from 6 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

100%
State average from 6 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 6 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

45%
State average from 6 schools:

58%
Making Reading Gains
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

73%
State average from 6 schools:

68%
Making Math Gains
Here:

82%
State average from 6 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 6 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 6 schools:

70%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

640
State average from 6 schools:

579
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 6 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 6 schools:

37%
Minority Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 6 schools:

38%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1971
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

411
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

57%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

100%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

23
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1988
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

370
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

24%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

47%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

100%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

13
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

374
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

11
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

12
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1843
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

417
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

43%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

50%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

100%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

11
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1868
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

375
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

47%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

100%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

11
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1832
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

362
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 2: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 04

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1783
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

375
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1739
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

372
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1691
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

385
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 11
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

17
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

87
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

17
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKELAND MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOUSE:

18
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Lakeland, FL
  5. Lakeland Montessori House School in Lakeland, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.