Lakewood Ranch High School in Bradenton, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 72.

5500 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD
Bradenton, FL 34211

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Coastal Behavioral Healthcare Residential Treatment Center School (9.8 miles):	92
Lakewood Ranch High School:	72
Juvenile Detention Center School (8.8 miles):	66
Sarasota Military Academy School (9.4 miles):	43
Sarasota Military Academy School (9.4 miles):	34
Cyesis School (11.2 miles):	27
Character House School (12.7 miles):	12
Manatee Palms Youth Services School (11.1 miles):	2

Lakewood Ranch High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Manatee County:	42
Bradenton:	45
Lakewood Ranch High School:	72

Nancy Smith

Jun 2, 2011 @ 7:19 pm

Can you tell us the universities and/or colleges where graduates were accepted?
Thank you.

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (941) 727-6100 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 41
School number: 721
School type: Senior High
District Name: MANATEE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 727-6099
Principal: Mike Wilder
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 67
Senate District: 21
School Web Address: www.manatee.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	87%
State average from 451 schools:	62%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	86%
State average from 451 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	93%
State average from 452 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	70%
State average from 451 schools:	48%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 452 schools:	58%

Making Math Gains

Here:	80%
State average from 449 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 452 schools:	52%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	83%
State average from 452 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	640
State average from 452 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 450 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	25%
State average from 454 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	26%
State average from 454 schools:	47%

Region: 2

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1333 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1333 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 452
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1304
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1256

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1304
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1257
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 988 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 988 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 327
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 968
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 931

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 968
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 932
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 329 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 329 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 315
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 301

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 315
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 301
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 166 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	87%
State average from 443 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	82%
State average from 440 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	98%
State average from 443 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	66%
State average from 443 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 441 schools:	59%

Making Math Gains

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	69%
State average from 442 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	71%
State average from 442 schools:	56%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	65%
State average from 441 schools:	66%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	609
State average from 441 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 448 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	21%
State average from 446 schools:	46%

Minority Rate

Here:	26%
State average from 451 schools:	45%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1401 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1401 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 450
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1358
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1300

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1358
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1300
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1039 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1039 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 331
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1012
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 973

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1012
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 973
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 294 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 294 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 273

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 273
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	85%
State average from 425 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	86%
State average from 425 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	98%
State average from 425 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	60%
State average from 425 schools:	45%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 425 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	78%
State average from 425 schools:	74%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 425 schools:	55%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	74%
State average from 425 schools:	71%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	621
State average from 425 schools:	526

Percent Tested

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 425 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	17%
State average from 425 schools:	42%

Minority Rate

Here:	27%
State average from 425 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1416 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1416 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 497
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1373
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1306

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1373
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1306
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1039 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1039 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 362
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1010
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 962

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1010
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 962
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 203 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 203 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 242 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 242 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	51%
State average from 370 schools:	45%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	77%
State average from 370 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	84%
State average from 370 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	54%
State average from 370 schools:	41%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	54%
State average from 370 schools:	52%

Making Math Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 370 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	49%
State average from 370 schools:	49%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	56%
State average from 370 schools:	67%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	506
State average from 370 schools:	482

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 370 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	12%
State average from 372 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	16%
State average from 372 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 967 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 965 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 441
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 926
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 927
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 791 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 790 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 375
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 772
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 773
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	53%
State average from 360 schools:	45%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	82%
State average from 361 schools:	68%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 361 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 361 schools:	53%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 361 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	55%
State average from 361 schools:	53%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	413
State average from 361 schools:	374

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 361 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	14%
State average from 362 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	14%
State average from 362 schools:	47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 987 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 977 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 501
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 962
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 949
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 858 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 850 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 445

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 838
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 828
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (96%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 50

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 59

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 61
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 137
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 134
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 71
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	10%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 128
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 126
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	48%
State average from 348 schools:	42%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	79%
State average from 348 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	91%
State average from 348 schools:	84%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	52%
State average from 348 schools:	51%

Making Math Gains

Here:	78%
State average from 348 schools:	73%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	52%
State average from 348 schools:	53%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	400
State average from 348 schools:	371

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 348 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	14%
State average from 347 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	15%
State average from 348 schools:	45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1092
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	266
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	40%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	51%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1500
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	22%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	35%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	63%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1483
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	29%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	2%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	49%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	1
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1894
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	34%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	86%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1978
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	85%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2019
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	9%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	77%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2003
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	24%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	20%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	59%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2058
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	70%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	26%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	8%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	15%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	49%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	37%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	36%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	28%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	46%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	67%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	320
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	40%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	5%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	1%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	47%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1280
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	31%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	57%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1537
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	14%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	67%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1518
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	32%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	12%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	35%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1843
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	6%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	13%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	82%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1870
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	10%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2001
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	40%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	32%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	91%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1984
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	29%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2053
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	326

Percent Passing

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	92%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1174
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	279
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1514
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1549
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1838
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1947
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	343
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1996
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2018
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2027
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	293
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1283
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1464
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1552
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1759
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	330
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1907
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1976
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2001
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	2026
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 253

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 460

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 460

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1267
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1503
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	306
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1576
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1860
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	1936
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1985
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2010
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2058
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	1232
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1497
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1611
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1812
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1924
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1993
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1996
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2041
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	34
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	622
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	51
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	256
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	641
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	59
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	13
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	244
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	661
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	67
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	438
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	694
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	81
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	17
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	464
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	705
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	84
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	14
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	505
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	708
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	81
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	470
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	710
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	76
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	13
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	471
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	725
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	80
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 249

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	283
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 508

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	331
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 71%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	5
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 485

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	324
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 70%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	1972
State average from 612 schools:	1849

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	298

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1986
State average:	1837

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1892
State average:	1779

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 95

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1956
State average from 573 schools:	1879

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	306
State average:	291

Percent Passing: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1968
State average:	1873

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1982
State average:	1876

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -14

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	319
State average:	295

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1969
State average from 613 schools:	1884

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	315
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1978
State average:	1869

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1931
State average:	1821

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 47

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	2000
State average from 581 schools:	1950

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	315

Percent Passing: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	2007
State average:	1939

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1974
State average:	1901

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 33

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 480

Mean Scale Score

LAKEWOOD RANCH HIGH SCHOOL:	719
State average from 597 schools:	696

Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 434

Mean Scale Score

Here:	704
State average from 575 schools:	695

Median NPR: 62
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 480

Mean Scale Score

Here:	726
State average from 597 schools:	708

Median NPR: 81
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 10
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 434

Mean Scale Score

Here:	717
State average from 575 schools:	710

Median NPR: 68
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 454

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	304
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 81%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 62%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI