Lawrence Academy School in Florida City, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 17.

777 W PALM DRIVE
Florida City, FL 33034

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (11.4 miles):

98
Palmetto Middle School (17.9 miles):

79
Winston Park K-8 Center School (18.0 miles):

74
Miami Palmetto Senior High School (18.3 miles):

60
Centennial Middle School (13.1 miles):

47
Miami Sunset Senior High School (18.2 miles):

31
Cutler Ridge Middle School (13.1 miles):

18
Lawrence Academy School:

17
Lawrence Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Florida City:

28
Lawrence Academy School:

17

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 247-4800 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6008
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 247-4895
Principal: Israel Katz
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 3 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 119
Senate District: 39

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

34%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

13%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

404
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: D

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

43%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

18%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

511
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

48%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

15%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

87%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

492
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

35%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

21%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

76%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

3%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

45%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

337
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

38%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

15%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

88%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

48%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

330
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 58
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 58
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1622
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1750
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

51%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

21%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

59%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1598
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

39%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

25%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1704
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

49%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

24%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1808
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

298
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

36%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

1613
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

1632
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1817
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1581
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1710
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1847
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 41
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1456
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1705
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1747
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1548
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1759
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1801
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

33
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

38
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

45
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

667
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

54
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

41
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

41
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

10
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 43
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

255
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 19%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1465
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

267
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1444
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1375
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 68

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1625
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

282
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1605
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1572
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 33

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1618
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1629
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1550
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 79

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

224
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1490
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1486
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

1504
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -18

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1644
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1639
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1525
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 114

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1689
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1686
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1613
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 73

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 46
Mean Scale Score
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

651
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 47
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 41
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 28
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 47
Mean Scale Score
Here:

646
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 42
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 39
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 55
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 41
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 40
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 41
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

225
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
LAWRENCE ACADEMY:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 46%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Florida City, FL
  5. Lawrence Academy School in Florida City, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.