Learey Technical Center School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 20.

5410 N 20TH ST
Tampa, FL 33610

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Westchase Elementary School (10.1 miles):

95
Maniscalco Elementary School (9.1 miles):

74
Brooker Elementary School (11.4 miles):

61
Highland Lakes Elementary School (18.7 miles):

50
Witter Elementary School (3.5 miles):

40
Modesta Robbins Partnership School (16.9 miles):

30
Learey Technical Center School:

20
New Heights Elementary School (20.0 miles):

17
Learey Technical Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Learey Technical Center School:

20

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 231-1907 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 2381
School type: Adult
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 231-1855
Principal: Paula Clark
The function/setting of the school: Area Vocational-Technical Center
The main educational program offered at the school: Vocational/Technical
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 59
Senate District: 18

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

48%
State average from 133 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

92%
State average from 133 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

34%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 133 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

490
State average from 133 schools:

541
Percent Tested
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 133 schools:

43%
Region: 2

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 880 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 880 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 251
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 813
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 775

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 808
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 769
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 238 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 238 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 219

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 216
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 490 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 490 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 447
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 428

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 446
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 424
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 571 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 571 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 156
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 514
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 487

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 510
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 485
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

45%
State average from 133 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 133 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

30%
State average from 133 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

58%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 133 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

465
State average from 133 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

62%
State average from 132 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 133 schools:

42%
Region: 2


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 849 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 849 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 230
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 784
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 724

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 779
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 717
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 196
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 465 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 466 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 429
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 426
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 391
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 527 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 527 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 125
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 476
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 441

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 474
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 438
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

46%
State average from 131 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 131 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

29%
State average from 131 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 131 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 131 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 131 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

466
State average from 131 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 131 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

60%
State average from 131 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

74%
State average from 131 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 768 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 768 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 229
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 694
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 646

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 694
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 647
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 200 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 423 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 424 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 378
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 353

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 380
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 356
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 459 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 460 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 402
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 375

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 403
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 375
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1556
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1734
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

18%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

57%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1818
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

7%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

34%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1569
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

286
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

43%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1709
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

35%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

8%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

1%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1848
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1642
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1696
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1834
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1576
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1683
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1824
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 251
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

1596
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

291
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1728
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1797
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

282
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1566
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1714
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1836
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

285
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

50
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

247
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

58
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

246
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 250
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

258
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 24%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Tampa, FL
  5. Learey Technical Center School in Tampa, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.