City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 84.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Ptec - St Petersburg School (17.8 miles): | 98 |
| Leila Davis Elementary School: | 84 |
| Davis Elementary School (7.0 miles): | 74 |
| Tarpon Springs Elementary School (9.5 miles): | 62 |
| Macfarlane Park Elementary Magnet School (14.3 miles): | 50 |
| Skycrest Elementary School (4.4 miles): | 39 |
| Richey Elementary School (16.6 miles): | 30 |
| Hammond Elementary School (10.9 miles): | 19 |
| Dixie Hollins Adult Education Center School (13.9 miles): | 0 |
Leila Davis Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Pinellas County: | 51 |
| Clearwater: | 44 |
| Leila Davis Elementary School: | 84 |
1
Van
Nov 20, 2013 @ 9:21 pm
Leila Davis is a great school! The teachers, staff and administration are looking to help all students in a positive and engaging way! The new science lab is AMAZING. Not only is the facility GREAT, the opportunity for our students to REALLY do experiments in a LAB is awesome! They are scientists in the making!!
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 52
School number: 991
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 725-7975
Principal: Kimberly E Hill
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 48
Senate District: 16
School Web Address: http://www.davis-es.pinellas.k12.fl.us
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 70% |
| State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 560 |
| State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 119999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 382 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 382 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 367
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 367
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 284
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 284
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 75% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 72% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 603 |
| State average from 959 schools: | 560 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 376 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 376 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 357
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 356
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 282 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 95% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 72% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 626 |
| State average from 954 schools: | 544 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 356 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 356 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1593 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 20 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1739 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 80% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 21 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1792 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 84% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 26% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 64% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1619 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 369 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 92% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1698 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 356 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 85% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1754 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 351 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1542 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1697 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1812 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 339 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1628 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 371 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 34%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1658 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1785 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 358 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 125
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 1| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1469 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1762 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 351 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1819 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 359 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1732 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 363 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1774 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 355 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 126 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 642 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 69 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 117 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 673 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 83 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 17 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 113 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 687 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 86 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 190 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 1 |
| State average: | 201 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 192 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 273 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 237 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 116
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%| Here: | 331 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%| Here: | 224 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 3
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 54%| Here: | 234 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 8%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 62%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 46%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.