Mariner Middle School in Cape Coral, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 28.

425 CHIQUITA BLVD N
Cape Coral, FL 33993

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
The Sanibel School (16.3 miles):

88
Diplomat Middle School (3.8 miles):

63
Oak Hammock Middle School (13.4 miles):

54
Excelsior Middle Academy Of Lee County School (8.9 miles):

50
Life Institute For Education Academy School (10.0 miles):

40
Mariner Middle School:

28
Six Mile Charter Academy School (8.9 miles):

23
Sw Fl Addiction Services-The Vince Smith Center School (9.6 miles):

5
Mariner Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Lee County:

49
Cape Coral:

57
Mariner Middle School:

28

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (239) 772-1848 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 722
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: LEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 242-1256
Principal: Rachel Gould
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 74
Senate District: 21
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net.schools/mrm

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

52%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

43%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

518
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

83%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

44%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 908 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 907 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 268
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 733
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 664

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 732
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 658
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 501 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 501 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 152
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 418
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 371

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 417
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 368
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 257 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 256 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 751 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 750 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 602
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 551

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 601
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 545
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

52%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

44%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

485
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

44%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1013 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1010 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 287
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 811
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 725

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 803
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 721
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 559 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 559 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 160
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 454
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 450
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 80
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 746 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 744 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 198
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 586
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 526

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 579
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 522
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

498
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

64%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

44%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 858 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 856 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 325
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 801
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 712

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 799
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 710
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 185
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 457
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 401

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 458
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 403
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 258 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 257 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 237
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 236
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 538 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 535 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 186
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 500
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 443

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 497
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 440
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

490
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 943 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 942 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 367
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 864
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 860
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 516 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 517 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 193
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 481
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 482
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 320 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 319 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 137
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 169
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 424
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 422
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

80%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

391
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

44%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1214 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1212 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 357
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1027
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1025
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 674 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 672 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 190

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 589
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 588
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 67

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 399 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 399 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 118
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 321
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 322
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 595 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 594 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 159
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 500
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 498
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 53

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 36

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 110
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 110
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

64%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

355
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

38%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1663
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

18%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1781
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

312
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1853
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

304
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1600
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

34%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1726
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

290
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

39%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1874
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

315
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

27%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1611
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1720
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1827
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1600
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1755
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1859
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 345
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1581
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1731
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1847
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1611
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1756
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1871
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

264
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

657
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

50
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

278
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

674
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

60
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

346
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

59
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 352
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

270
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 32%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1574
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1592
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1570
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 21

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1729
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

302
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1738
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1672
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 65

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1796
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1809
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1708
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 101

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1594
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1611
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1644
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -33

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1774
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1782
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1690
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 92

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1842
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1851
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1758
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 92

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 223
Mean Scale Score
Here:

661
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 54
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 319
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 58
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 398
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 60
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 223
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 57
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 317
Mean Scale Score
MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

682
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 399
Mean Scale Score
Here:

694
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 395
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

263
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 30%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 60%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Cape Coral, FL
  5. Mariner Middle School in Cape Coral, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.