Mast Academy School in Key Biscayne, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 94.

3979 RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY
Key Biscayne, FL 33149

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Mast Academy School:

94
New World Of The Arts School (3.1 miles):

87
Young Womens Preparatory Academy School (3.7 miles):

64
Academy Of Arts & Minds School (4.9 miles):

47
Mater Academy East Charter High School (3.6 miles):

32
Parkway Academy School (16.8 miles):

16
Richmond Perrine Optimist School (15.1 miles):

6
Life Skills Center Opa Locka School (12.2 miles):

1
Mast Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Key Biscayne:

83
Mast Academy School:

94

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 365-6278 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7161
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 361-0996
Magnet School.
Principal: Thomas C Fisher Ii
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 18
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 107
Senate District: 35
School Web Address: http://mast.dade.k12.fl.us/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

90%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MAST ACADEMY:

100%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

81%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

87%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

100%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MAST ACADEMY:

712
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

36%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 281 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 281 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 141
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 265
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

99%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

84%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

85%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

100%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

706
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 283 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 282
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 246
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 282
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 246
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MAST ACADEMY:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MAST ACADEMY:

89%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

99%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

86%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

97%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

706
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 273 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 273 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 136
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 247
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 247
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

97%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

79%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

87%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

91%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

687
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MAST ACADEMY:

28%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 277 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 277 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 138
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 269
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 269
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MAST ACADEMY:

84%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

97%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

88%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

515
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 268 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 268 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 129
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 264
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 264
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 64
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 64
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 68

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MAST ACADEMY:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 132
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 132
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 74
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 74
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

96%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

84%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

509
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

70%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2251
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

373
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

31%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

93%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2343
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

377
State average:

302
Percent Passing
MAST ACADEMY:

96%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

44%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

58%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MAST ACADEMY:

4%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MAST ACADEMY:

81%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

12
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

10
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MAST ACADEMY:

2141
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

45%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

41%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

100%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
MAST ACADEMY:

6
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
MAST ACADEMY:

9
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MAST ACADEMY:

7
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MAST ACADEMY:

2177
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

370
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

100%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

49%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

41%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

100%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
MAST ACADEMY:

8
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

10
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

12
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MAST ACADEMY:

2213
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2280
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 97%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 39%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

372
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 10
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 11
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2127
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

362
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 37%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 99%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2168
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

368
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 100%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 37%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 99%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 11
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 145
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 99%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2199
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAST ACADEMY:

363
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2336
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

376
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 99%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 51%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 10

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

364
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 11
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2136
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 99%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2156
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 99%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 99%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 10
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

139
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

735
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
MAST ACADEMY:

91
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
MAST ACADEMY:

15
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

12
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

134
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

758
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
MAST ACADEMY:

95
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

17
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

18
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

13
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

9
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 135
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

372
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 94%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 99%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2233
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2240
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
MAST ACADEMY:

2117
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 124

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2300
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 96%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 45%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 15
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2293
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2198
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 94

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 10

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2131
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 47%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2141
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2083
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 59

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2152
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAST ACADEMY:

364
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 99%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 98%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 11
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2150
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2114
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 36

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 134
Mean Scale Score
Here:

748
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 94
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 16
Functional (max 18): 17
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 18
Critical Analysis (max 14): 12
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 143
Mean Scale Score
Here:

739
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 89
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 12
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 134
Mean Scale Score
Here:

759
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 94
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 12
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 9
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 11

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 143
Mean Scale Score
Here:

750
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 90
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 11
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 143
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

373
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 97%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 15
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 98%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Key Biscayne, FL
  5. Mast Academy School in Key Biscayne, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.