Meadow Park Elementary School in West Palm Beach, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 75.

956 FLORIDA MANGO RD
West Palm Beach, FL 33406

Show street view No street view available for this location
Meadow Park Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
West Palm Beach:

47
Meadow Park Elementary School:

75

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 357-2800 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 591
School type: Elementary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 357-2828
Principal: Pamela W Arnette
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 22
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 85
Senate District: 30
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Meadow_Park_Elementary

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

93%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

91%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

81%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

636
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 405 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 405 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 389
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 378

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 391
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 380
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 273 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 273 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 264
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 257

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 265
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 258
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

94%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

72%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

649
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 403 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 403 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 135
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 385
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 377

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 385
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 376
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 269 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 269 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 89
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

95%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

95%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

71%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

627
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 413 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 413 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 123
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 404
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 393

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 403
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 392
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 283 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 80
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 278
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 269

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

83%
State average from 862 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 862 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

51%
State average from 862 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

84%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 862 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

609
State average from 862 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 862 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

61%
State average from 865 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

68%
State average from 865 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 291 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 291 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

86%
State average from 848 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

76%
State average from 848 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 848 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 848 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 848 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 848 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

469
State average from 848 schools:

413
Percent Tested
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 848 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

63%
State average from 848 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

66%
State average from 848 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 275 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 275 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 86
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 261
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 263
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 36

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 115
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 115
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 43

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 115
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 117
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 48

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 145
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 147
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 79
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 81
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 834 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 834 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 834 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 834 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 834 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

453
State average from 834 schools:

412
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 834 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
Here:

61%
State average from 832 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1564
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

49%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1749
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

45%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1795
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1519
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1298
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

83%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1539
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

237
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

73%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

41%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1546
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1705
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

93%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1812
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1538
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

278
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

44%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

34%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1323
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

191
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

92%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1548
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

232
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

82%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

2
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1565
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

352
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1801
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1546
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

282
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1541
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1547
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1711
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

358
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1811
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1559
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

283
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1700
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 144
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1734
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1762
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

330
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1574
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1480
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

230
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1608
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1729
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1790
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1580
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

288
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1359
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

185
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 1
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1522
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

184
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 1
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 1

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

131
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

655
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

78
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

125
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

81
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

158
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

84
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

205
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

656
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

49
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

614
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

8
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

5
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

3
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

630
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

13
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

2
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 126
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

334
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1375
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1538
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1579
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1352
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 227

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1686
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1697
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1565
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 132

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1487
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1554
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1572
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1454
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 118

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1677
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1695
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1577
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 117

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 96
Mean Scale Score
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

639
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 98
Mean Scale Score
Here:

644
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 99
Mean Scale Score
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

672
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 76
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 96
Mean Scale Score
MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

642
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 75
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 98
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 99
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 95
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

307
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 68%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 81%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.