Miami Edison Middle School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 11.

6101 NW 2ND AVE
Miami, FL 33127

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
George Washington Carver Middle School (8.2 miles):

97
Coral Way K-8 Center School (5.5 miles):

75
Ben Sheppard Annex School (9.1 miles):

63
Biscayne Gardens Elementary School (5.5 miles):

50
Carol City Middle School (8.7 miles):

34
Aspira Raul Arnaldo Martinez Charter School (4.6 miles):

21
Miami Edison Middle School:

11
Downtown Miami Charter School (3.8 miles):

7
Miami Edison Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Miami Edison Middle School:

11

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 754-4683 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6481
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 757-2219
Principal: Isolyn T Hillhouse
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 109
Senate District: 39
School Web Address: http://mems.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

48%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

10%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

76%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

480
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: I

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 461 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 460 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 156
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 424
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 411

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 425
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 412
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 412 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 411 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 140
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 378
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 368

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 378
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 368
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 453 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 452 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 155
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 418
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 405

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 419
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 406
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

36%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

31%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

431
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: I

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 545 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 545 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 182
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 487
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 476

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 485
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 474
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 491 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 491 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 168
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 443
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 434

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 441
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 432
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 489 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 489 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 161
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 437
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 427

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 426
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

39%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

28%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

431
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: I

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 513 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 513 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 142
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 469
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 427

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 468
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 425
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 467 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 467 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 131
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 428
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 393

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 427
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 391
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 460 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 461 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 117
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 420
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 420
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 381
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

Grade in 2007: I

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

26%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

25%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

77%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

337
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 601 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 601 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 221
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 554
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 551
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 568 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 568 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 208
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 526
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 523
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 574 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 574 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 211
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 529
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 528
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 34
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 89
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 88
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 31
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 95
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

20%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

23%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

70%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

318
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1406
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

47%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

31%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1650
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

287
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

34%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

41%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1741
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1516
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

53%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

26%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1706
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

35%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1799
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1472
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1566
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

271
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1481
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1632
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1700
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 179
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 3
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1441
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1548
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1686
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1455
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1607
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

261
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1717
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

147
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

639
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

33
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

195
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

38
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

149
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

33
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 142
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

253
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 30%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1453
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1477
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1403
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 74

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1518
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1569
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1490
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 79

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1644
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1674
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1565
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 109

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1423
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1433
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1434
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -1

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1567
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1615
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1431
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 184

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1717
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:

275
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1769
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1662
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 107

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 187
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 39
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 146
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 36
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 213
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 35
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 186
Mean Scale Score
Here:

638
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 147
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 42
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 212
Mean Scale Score
Here:

678
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 50
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.