N Dade Center For Modern Language School in Miami Gardens, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 84.

1840 NW 157TH ST
Miami Gardens, FL 33054

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Imagine Charter At Weston School (19.4 miles):

98
N Dade Center For Modern Language School:

84
Coral Cove Elementary School (7.7 miles):

82
Vineland K-8 Center School (18.8 miles):

68
Ruth K. Broad-Bay Harbor Elementary School (6.7 miles):

55
Lloyd Estates Elementary School (18.7 miles):

48
Chancellor Charter At Sarasota School (12.9 miles):

37
Hubert O. Sibley Elementary School (3.0 miles):

17
Robert Renick Education Center School (3.4 miles):

0
N Dade Center For Modern Language School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Broward County:

47
Miami Gardens:

36
N Dade Center For Modern Language:

84

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 625-3885 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 5131
School type: Elementary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 1 TO 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 625-6069
Magnet School.
Principal: Maria Castaigne
School Web Address: http://northdadecenterfor.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

85%
State average from 3 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 3 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 3 schools:

90%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

67%
State average from 3 schools:

56%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 3 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 3 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

62%
State average from 3 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 3 schools:

71%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

604
State average from 3 schools:

569
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 3 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 3 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 3 schools:

77%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 260 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 260 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 167 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 3 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 3 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 3 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

82%
State average from 3 schools:

58%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 3 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

77%
State average from 3 schools:

75%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 3 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 3 schools:

71%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

657
State average from 3 schools:

576
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 3 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

61%
State average from 3 schools:

44%
Minority Rate
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

95%
State average from 3 schools:

77%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 266 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 266 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 266
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 266
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

84%
State average from 3 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

87%
State average from 3 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 3 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

61%
State average from 3 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 3 schools:

71%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 3 schools:

80%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 3 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

80%
State average from 3 schools:

83%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

613
State average from 3 schools:

586
Percent Tested
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

99%
State average from 3 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 3 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 3 schools:

77%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 285 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 285 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 88%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 85%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 96%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 63%

Making Reading Gains: 75%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains: 59%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 75%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 613

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 51%

Minority Rate: 94%


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 311 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 311 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 113
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 90%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 90%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 96%

Making Reading Gains: 69%

Making Math Gains: 70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 65%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 480

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 53%

Minority Rate: 94%


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 329 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 329 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 120
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 322
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 322
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 53

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 135
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 135
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 54

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 51

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 153
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 153
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 90%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 87%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 95%

Making Reading Gains: 77%

Making Math Gains: 67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 74%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 490

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 55%

Minority Rate: 92%


Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1552
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

50%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1707
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

1777
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

42%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

82%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

4%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

5%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

1563
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 2
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

49%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1666
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1795
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

360
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1508
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1862
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1570
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

358
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1656
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

1893
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

381
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 11
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 94
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1499
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1708
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1770
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

332
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1513
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1707
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1821
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

97
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

648
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

89
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

81
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

99
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

682
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

83
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 90
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

328
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1501
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1694
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1700
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1560
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 139

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1787
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1787
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1719
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 68

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

1599
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

1578
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1586
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1554
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 31

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1774
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1774
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1666
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 108

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113
Mean Scale Score
N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE:

657
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 73
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 111
Mean Scale Score
Here:

695
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 90
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 82
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 111
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 113
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

345
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 85%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 96%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami Gardens, FL
  5. N Dade Center For Modern Language School in Miami Gardens, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.