Natural Bridge Elementary School in North Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 23.

1650 NE 141ST ST
North Miami, FL 33181

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hallandale Elementary School (4.9 miles):

96
James W. Johnson Elementary School (9.2 miles):

78
George W. Carver Elementary School (13.6 miles):

64
Pembroke Pines/Fsus Charter Elementary School (14.7 miles):

52
Meadowbrook Elementary School (13.5 miles):

43
Lauderdale Manors Elementary School (16.5 miles):

35
Natural Bridge Elementary School:

23
Olinda Elementary School (6.9 miles):

22
Natural Bridge Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
North Miami:

27
Natural Bridge Elementary School:

23

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 891-8649 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 3661
School type: Elementary
District Name: DADE
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 899-9695
Principal: Janice T Hutson
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 108
Senate District: 35
School Web Address: http://nbe.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

28%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

481
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 287 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 287 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 80
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 247 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 247 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 233
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 229

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 233
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 229
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 264 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 264 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 243

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 243
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

28%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

495
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 308 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 308 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 281

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 285
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 255 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 255 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 237
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 232
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 274 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 255
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 254
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

26%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

473
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 338 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 338 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 327
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 310

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 327
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 309
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 272 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 272 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 263
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 247

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 263
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 247
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 301 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 301 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 99
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 277

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 276
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 862 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 862 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

23%
State average from 862 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 862 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

481
State average from 862 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 862 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 865 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 865 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 386 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 386 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 364
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 364
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 314 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 314 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 352 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 352 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 335
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 335
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 848 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 848 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 848 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 848 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 848 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 848 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

393
State average from 848 schools:

413
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 848 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 848 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 848 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 400 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 399 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 116
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 374
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 374
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 314 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 314 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 94

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 296
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 296
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 67
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 67
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 374 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 373 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 107

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 353
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 353
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 52
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 153
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 152
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 51

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 834 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

52%
State average from 834 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

76%
State average from 834 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 834 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 834 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

385
State average from 834 schools:

412
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 834 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 832 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1223
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

287
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1491
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1542
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

42%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

26%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1362
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1492
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1637
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

326
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1143
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1502
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1480
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1277
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1559
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

324
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1526
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 90
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1167
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1440
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1429
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1321
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1455
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1540
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

119
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

610
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

41
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

114
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

636
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

56
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

107
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

645
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

52
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 112
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

288
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1160
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1389
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1430
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1289
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 141

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1488
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1491
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1400
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 91

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1280
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1471
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

303
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1493
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1339
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 154

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1542
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1553
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1456
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 97

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 151
Mean Scale Score
Here:

610
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 40
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 116
Mean Scale Score
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

624
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 45
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 119
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 151
Mean Scale Score
NATURAL BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

606
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 47
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 116
Mean Scale Score
Here:

635
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 63
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 119
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 56
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 115
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

270
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 74%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 52%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. North Miami, FL
  5. Natural Bridge Elementary School in North Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.