City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
1
Kimberly homrich
Jun 8, 2015 @ 5:17 pm
Hello, I have a few questions. I recently finished schooling at ICHS but only received my certificate of completion, due to not passing the Reading Fcat. How would your school be able to help me receive my diploma? I have all other credits that I need to graduate. Please help ASAP
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 36
School number: 4242
School type: Senior High
District Name: LEE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 242-4231
Principal: Lovely Tinsley
Regular charter school.
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 74
Senate District: 37
School Web Address: www.yourdiplomayourway.com/FL/locations.php#lee
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (73%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (64%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| NORTH NICHOLAS HIGH SCHOOL: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (65%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (69%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23 (61%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (64%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (60%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (63%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (57%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (66%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (66%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1714 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 261 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 63% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 17% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 229 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 87% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 30% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1874 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 53% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 33% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1742 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%| NORTH NICHOLAS HIGH SCHOOL: | 279 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1642 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 25%| NORTH NICHOLAS HIGH SCHOOL: | 247 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%| Here: | 250 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1755 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%| Here: | 252 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 1
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1832 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 42%| NORTH NICHOLAS HIGH SCHOOL: | 286 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 45
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 2| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 42%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.