North University High School in Sunrise, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 2.

4800 N UNIVERSITY DR
Sunrise, FL 33351

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
The Quest Center School (9.5 miles):

87
Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School (9.2 miles):

75
Miami Lakes Educational Center School (17.8 miles):

60
South Broward High School (12.2 miles):

42
Thompson Academy School (11.9 miles):

33
Hallandale High School (13.7 miles):

14
International Of Broward School (9.4 miles):

2
North University High School:

2
North University High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Broward County:

47
Sunrise:

28
North University High School:

2

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (954) 746-4483 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 5341
School type: Senior High
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (954) 746-5031
Principal: Laurel Suarez
Regular charter school.
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 94
Senate District: 32
School Web Address: www.yourdiplomayourway.com

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (73%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22 (73%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (80%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (74%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (84%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (81%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

81%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

14%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

5%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

5%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

7
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1662
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

13%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

77%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

71%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1714
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

240
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

50%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

30%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

20%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

20%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1866
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

326
Percent Passing
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

46%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

11%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
NORTH UNIVERSITY HIGH:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1709
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1611
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1749
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1768
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 40
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 40%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.