Thompson Academy School in Pembroke Pines, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 33.

1150 HIBISCUS DR
Pembroke Pines, FL 33025

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
George Washington Carver Middle School (18.9 miles):

97
Youth Co-Op Charter School (10.5 miles):

73
Somerset Academy Middle School (10.9 miles):

57
Allapattah Middle School (12.8 miles):

45
Thompson Academy School:

33
Fienberg-Fisher Elementary School (16.5 miles):

31
Brownsville Middle School (12.5 miles):

13
Jose De Diego Middle School (13.7 miles):

6
Young Mens Academy For Academic And Civic Development At Miami Douglas Macarthur North Senior High School (9.3 miles):

0
Thompson Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Broward County:

47
Pembroke Pines:

62
Thompson Academy School:

33

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (954) 322-4500 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 6012
School type: Senior High
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Neglected, Residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (954) 322-8488
Principal: Linda Thomas
The function/setting of the school: Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 99
Senate District: 31

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 133 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

43%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 133 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 132 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 133 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

556
State average from 133 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 132 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 137 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 137 schools:

53%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1249 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1249 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 409
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1232
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1220

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1232
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1220
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1181 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1181 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 388
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1165
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1155

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1165
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1022 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1022 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 336
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1009
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1001

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1009
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1001
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 141 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 139 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 136 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 133 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

561
State average from 133 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 134 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 132 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

98%
State average from 139 schools:

52%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1157 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1157 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 370
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1116
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1093

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1093
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1099 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1099 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 353
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1059
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1038

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1059
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1038
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 908 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 908 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 286
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 872
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 857

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 872
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 857
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 124 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 124 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 125 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

40%
State average from 122 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 122 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 122 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 122 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 122 schools:

70%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

551
State average from 122 schools:

535
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 124 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 126 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 125 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1095 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1099 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 360
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1076
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1035

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1078
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1037
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1035 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1039 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 338
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1018
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 981

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1020
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 983
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 818 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 821 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 270
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 805
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 775

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 806
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 776
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (91%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (92%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (95%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (92%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (95%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1803
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1869
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

329
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1930
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1771
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1877
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

16%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1942
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1746
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1835
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1906
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1767
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1833
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1924
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 375
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1729
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

1859
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

1916
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1715
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

1845
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

320
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

1926
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

368
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

351
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

690
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

74
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

362
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

695
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 366
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

298
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
THOMPSON ACADEMY:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Pembroke Pines, FL
  5. Thompson Academy School in Pembroke Pines, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.