Oak Hill Elementary School in Orlando, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 22.

11 S HAWASSEE RD
Orlando, FL 32835

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Lake Eola Charter School (6.8 miles):	98
Heathrow Elementary School (19.7 miles):	70
Evans Elementary School (19.1 miles):	60
Woodlands Elementary School (15.6 miles):	54
Dommerich Elementary School (12.0 miles):	46
Wolf Lake Elementary School (15.5 miles):	36
William S. Maxey Elementary School (6.2 miles):	26
Oak Hill Elementary School:	22

Oak Hill Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Orange County:	44
Orlando:	42
Oak Hill Elementary School:	22

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (407) 296-6470 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 1501
School type: Elementary
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 521-3343
Principal: Jun P Jones
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 39
Senate District: 9

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	53%
State average from 734 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	51%
State average from 734 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	88%
State average from 734 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	34%
State average from 733 schools:	53%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	61%
State average from 734 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 733 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 734 schools:	58%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	62%
State average from 734 schools:	66%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	481
State average from 734 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 733 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	89%
State average from 734 schools:	57%

Minority Rate

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	52%
State average from 735 schools:	46%

Region: 4

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 621 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 620 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 179
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 550
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 525

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 549
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 524
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 300 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 299 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 267
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 266
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 133 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 549 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 549 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 153
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 485
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 463

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 485
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 463
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	54%
State average from 735 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	48%
State average from 734 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	78%
State average from 734 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	38%
State average from 734 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 734 schools:	67%

Making Math Gains

Here:	63%
State average from 735 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 735 schools:	65%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	62%
State average from 734 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	483
State average from 734 schools:	557

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 734 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	81%
State average from 734 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	53%
State average from 734 schools:	45%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 683 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 684 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 180
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 597
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 558

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 598
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 557
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 320 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 320 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 287
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 287
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 269
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 552 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 553 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 138
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 482
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 451

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 483
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 450
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	51%
State average from 711 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	45%
State average from 711 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	84%
State average from 711 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	29%
State average from 711 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	63%
State average from 711 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	68%
State average from 711 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	76%
State average from 711 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 711 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	483
State average from 711 schools:	544

Percent Tested

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 711 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	78%
State average from 711 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	51%
State average from 711 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 658 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 658 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 184
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 578
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 525

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 577
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 523
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 317 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 317 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 263
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 154 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 513 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 513 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 141
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 453
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 408

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 452
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 407
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 652 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	60%
State average from 652 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	81%
State average from 652 schools:	83%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	27%
State average from 650 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 652 schools:	72%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 652 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	63%
State average from 652 schools:	67%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 652 schools:	69%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	498
State average from 652 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 652 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	72%
State average from 655 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	84%
State average from 655 schools:	55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 226 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 226 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 643 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	61%
State average from 643 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	50%
State average from 643 schools:	81%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	68%
State average from 643 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 643 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	61%
State average from 643 schools:	61%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	381
State average from 643 schools:	420

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 643 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	71%
State average from 644 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	85%
State average from 644 schools:	54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 240 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 78
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 223
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 225
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 99
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 101
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 54
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 54
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 56

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 156
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 158
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	69%
State average from 631 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	59%
State average from 631 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	61%
State average from 631 schools:	80%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 631 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	55%
State average from 631 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	60%
State average from 631 schools:	60%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	362
State average from 631 schools:	417

Percent Tested

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 631 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	69%
State average from 631 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	81%
State average from 631 schools:	52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1289
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	45%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	64%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1592
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	42%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	74%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	20
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1635
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	16%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	30%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	69%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1542
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	48%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1707
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	23%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	49%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1775
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	29%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	38%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	7%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	33%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	31%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	39%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	30%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	44%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	1%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	27%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1311
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	22%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	59%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1533
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	20%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	20%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	66%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1625
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	48%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1546
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	43%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	37%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1720
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	44%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1811
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	299
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	7%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	46%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1282
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1532
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 04%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1578
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1569
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1661
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1802
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	283
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1313
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1501
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1547
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	307
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1576
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1671
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1801
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 75

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 52%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 199

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1296
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1566
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1561
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	294
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1543
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1667
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1772
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	274
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1317
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1444
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1605
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	320
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1547
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1678
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	278
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1822
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	79
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	619
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	49
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	72
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	651
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	68
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	65
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	657
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	63
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	230
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	654
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	47
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	11
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	226
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	667
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	54
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	11
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	209
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	677
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	54
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 71

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	278
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 55%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 209

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	264
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 25%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1242
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1562
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1554
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1346
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 208

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1519
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1512
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1409
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 103

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	273
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1262
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1533
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1530
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1307
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 224

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1522
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	302
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1529
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1377
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 151

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 80

Mean Scale Score

Here:	618
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 47
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64

Mean Scale Score

Here:	639
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 84

Mean Scale Score

OAK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	652
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 80

Mean Scale Score

Here:	607
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 47
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64

Mean Scale Score

Here:	647
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 84

Mean Scale Score

Here:	641
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 54
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 64

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	289
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 52%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 75%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 58%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT