City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 46.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Collegiate High At Northwest Florida State College School (10.0 miles): | 97 |
| Choctawhatchee Senior High School (1.1 miles): | 82 |
| Elliott Point Elementary School (3.4 miles): | 73 |
| Lula J. Edge Elementary School (8.6 miles): | 65 |
| James E Plew Elementary School (10.0 miles): | 56 |
| Destin Middle School (12.6 miles): | 51 |
| Okaloosa Applied Tech Center School: | 46 |
| W. E. Combs School (4.0 miles): | 32 |
Okaloosa Applied Tech Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Okaloosa County: | 53 |
| Fort Walton Beach: | 53 |
| Okaloosa Applied Tech Center: | 46 |
1
Gay Gallian
Apr 18, 2011 @ 6:18 pm
I would like information on the programs you offer. If you could e-mail me telling me how to receive this information I would certainly appreciate it. I'm very interested in learning as much as I can about your school. Thank you.
2
chelsea cusumano
Jun 13, 2011 @ 1:13 pm
I would like information on programs that you have
3
Matthew Isaiah
Sep 14, 2011 @ 9:09 am
I would like information on the programs you offer. If you could e-mail me telling me how to receive this information I would certainly appreciate it. I'm very interested in learning as much as I can about your school. Thank you.
4
shirleybrown
Oct 13, 2011 @ 6:18 pm
I would like information on your culinary program. I am very interested and would love to learn more about your school.
5
Shelley Morrison
Jan 9, 2012 @ 12:12 pm
I would like to know about your cosmetology class. I am very interested and wanting to start the class as soon as possible.
6
Pamela Lyons
Jan 23, 2012 @ 10:22 pm
Could you please send me information about your school on cosmetology. I am definitely interested in your school. Thank you.
7
Charlotte Pecora
Oct 29, 2012 @ 8:08 am
could you please email me information on the programs that you offer that are open at this time. I need to get back into school, I have a high school diploma and some college. But do not have a trade in a certain area and due to this I can not find a job. I would really like to start classes as soon as possible. Any information that you can give me in deeply appericated. Thanks in advance
8
Elliot G
Jan 4, 2014 @ 12:12 pm
Please send me a list of your classes and dates for the next semester please
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 46
School number: 701
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: OKALOOSA
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN AND GRADES 6 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 833-3466
Principal: Frank Fuller
The function/setting of the school: Area Vocational-Technical Center
The main educational program offered at the school: Vocational/Technical
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
Senate District: 4
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 60% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 696 |
| State average from 10 schools: | 542 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 119999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 56% |
Minority Rate
Region: 2| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 41% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 426 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 426 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 133
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 421
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 409
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 409
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 301 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 301 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 90% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 70% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 697 |
| State average from 10 schools: | 565 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 10% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
Region: 3| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 41% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 421 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 421 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 146
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 408
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 395
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 395
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 290
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 282
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 290
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 282
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 96% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 11 schools: | 79% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 69% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 692 |
| State average from 10 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 8% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 40% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 419 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 419 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 393
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 310 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 310 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 290
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 290
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (69%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (69%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (59%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (55%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (72%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24 (75%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26 (76%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1663 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 360 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 52% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 22% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 96% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 21 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1831 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 362 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 23% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 91% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 22 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1909 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 356 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 54% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 95% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 19 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1446 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 264 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 31% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1682 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 27% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 39% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 1% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 49% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1820 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 280 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 13 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 369 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 85% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 53% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 30% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1674 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 381 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 32% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 95% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1784 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 375 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 93% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1879 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 378 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 8% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 37% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 36% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 90% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1496 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 269 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 18% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1735 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 53% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1888 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 67% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 33% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1641 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 356 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1841 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 01%| Here: | 364 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1937 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 361 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1495 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%| Here: | 272 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1712 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1819 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1696 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 25%| Here: | 257 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 361 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%| Here: | 273 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%| Here: | 252 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1667 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 379 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1781 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 375 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1855 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 373 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1499 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%| Here: | 269 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1765 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 1879 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1869 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 58%| Here: | 295 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 149
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 343
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 22
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1652 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 358 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1829 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 362 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 23
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1854 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1645 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1699 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1756 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%| Here: | 281 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1764 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 39%| Here: | 270 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 358 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 282 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1704 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 387 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 39%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 11
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1747 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 367 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 97%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1841 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 370 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1690 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 1810 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1836 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1924 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 67%| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 309 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 145 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 662 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 83 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 135 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 682 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 88 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 139 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 691 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 88 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 17 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 379 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 662 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 55 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 357 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 675 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 61 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 192 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 273 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 696 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 54 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 135
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 352 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 78%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 10
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%| Here: | 259 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1424 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 244 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1414 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 7| Here: | 1407 |
| State average: | 1668 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1764 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%| Here: | 283 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1737 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -69| Here: | 1805 |
| State average: | 1779 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1770 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 39%| Here: | 271 |
| State average: | 291 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 67%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 1776 |
| State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -117| Here: | 1892 |
| State average: | 1876 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%| Here: | 285 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1736 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%| Here: | 247 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 70%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 1697 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -43| Here: | 1740 |
| State average: | 1821 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1881 |
| State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 47%| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 71%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1895 |
| State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -47| OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER: | 1942 |
| State average: | 1901 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 46| Here: | 688 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 54| Here: | 703 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 25
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 40%| Here: | 265 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 28%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 16%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 60%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 52%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.