Okeechobee Juvenile Justice-Level 6 School in Okeechobee, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 6.

1117 NE 39TH BLVD
Okeechobee, FL 34972

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Washington County Program/Eckerd School (1.5 miles):

52
Okeechobee Juvenile Justice-Level 4 School (4.1 miles):

48
Yearling Middle School (2.2 miles):

46
Okeechobee High School (4.1 miles):

34
New Endeavor High School (5.1 miles):

20
Okeechobee Juvenile Justice-Level 6 School:

6
Okeechobee Intensive Halfway House School (1.1 miles):

0
Cypress Juvenile Residential Facility School (0.0 miles):

0
Okeechobee Juvenile Justice-Level 6 School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Okeechobee County:

39
Okeechobee:

39
This School:

6

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 462-5125 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 47
School number: 8101
School type: Senior High
District Name: OKEECHOBEE
Grade range: GRADES 7 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Neglected, Residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 462-5295
Principal: Antonio Peters
The function/setting of the school: Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 78
Senate District: 17

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (85%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (85%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

1437
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

246
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

63%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

16%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

44%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

44%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

12%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1577
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

70%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

1458
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

213
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

6%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

94%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

209
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

93%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

83%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1439
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

68%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

11%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

65%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1686
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

232
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

80%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1716
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

258
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

18%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

65%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

12%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1423
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1570
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1607
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

183
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1512
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1586
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

242
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1736
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1733
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 25
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1381
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1502
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1606
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

251
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1530
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

1637
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

179
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 96%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1388
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1549
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1617
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

1689
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1807
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

14
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

627
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

23
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

23
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

35
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

21
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

23
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

23
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

653
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

23
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

16
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

42
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

227
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 6:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 67%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

254
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 20%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Okeechobee, FL
  5. Okeechobee Juvenile Justice-Level 6 School in Okeechobee, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.