City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 46.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Washington County Program/Eckerd School (3.2 miles): | 52 |
| Okeechobee Juvenile Justice-Level 4 School (5.8 miles): | 48 |
| Yearling Middle School: | 46 |
| Osceola Middle School (3.3 miles): | 35 |
| New Endeavor High School (3.3 miles): | 20 |
| Okeechobee Juvenile Justice-Level 10 School (9.8 miles): | 1 |
| Okeechobee Intensive Halfway House School (2.8 miles): | 0 |
| Cypress Juvenile Residential Facility School (2.2 miles): | 0 |
Yearling Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Okeechobee County: | 39 |
| Okeechobee: | 39 |
| Yearling Middle School: | 46 |
1
John Thornton
Jan 8, 2017 @ 5:17 pm
When do report cards come out for 2 nine weeks at yearling middle school in Okeechobee FL. Come home
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 47
School number: 121
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: OKEECHOBEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 462-5062
Principal: Brian Greseth
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 79
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://www.okee.k12.fl.us/web.nsf
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 514 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority Rate
Region: 2| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 310 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 310 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 293
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 294
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 604 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
Region: 3| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (80%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24 (80%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24 (80%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (77%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 559 |
| State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (80%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (74%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 10% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22 (77%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (80%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (75%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21 (70%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 538 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading Gains
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 64% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 555 |
| State average from 539 schools: | 523 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 541 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 542 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 763 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 758 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 446 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 442 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 422 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 419 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 89% |
Making Reading Gains
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 71% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 434 |
| State average from 526 schools: | 425 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 59% |
| State average from 525 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 759 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 766 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 455 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 458 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 226 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 448 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 453 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 59% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 360 |
| State average from 506 schools: | 397 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 38% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 50% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1475 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 329 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 18 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1644 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 330 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 77% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 20 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1684 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1876 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1986 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 351 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 32% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 86% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 19 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1980 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2146 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 77% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2208 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 352 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 87% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 24% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 72% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 35% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 49% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 331 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 51% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 5% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 1% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 71% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1544 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 85% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1588 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1684 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1775 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 17% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 33% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 67% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1895 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 27% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 77% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1950 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 78% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2065 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2094 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 350 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 95% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 2% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 20% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 91% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1521 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1708 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1659 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 312 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1521 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%| Here: | 233 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1723 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%| Here: | 275 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1740 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 47%| Here: | 266 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1553 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 355 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1628 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1727 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1788 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%| Here: | 262 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1769 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 43%| Here: | 271 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 86
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 31%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1503 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1571 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 318 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1641 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1368 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%| Here: | 233 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1576 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%| Here: | 245 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1619 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%| Here: | 256 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%| Here: | 228 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 350 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 10
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1500 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1580 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1675 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%| Here: | 252 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1795 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%| Here: | 264 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 80 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 645 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 71 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 105 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 656 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 73 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 84 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 672 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 77 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 190 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 621 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 636 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 19 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 661 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 30 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 237 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 105
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%| Here: | 303 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 63%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 92%| Here: | 192 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 42%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1688 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1694 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 116| Here: | 1578 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1791 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1799 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 97| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1702 |
| State average: | 1668 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1850 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1866 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 104| Here: | 1762 |
| State average: | 1738 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1721 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1722 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 117| Here: | 1605 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1811 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1809 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 115| Here: | 1694 |
| State average: | 1645 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1887 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 318 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1895 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 126| Here: | 1769 |
| State average: | 1755 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 248
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 69| Here: | 677 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 250
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 63| Here: | 677 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 257
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 65| Here: | 688 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 248
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 66| Here: | 671 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 251
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 70| Here: | 686 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 257
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 69| YEARLING MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 697 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 244
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%| Here: | 288 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 85%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.