City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
35.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Osceola Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Florida: | 45 |
| Okeechobee County: | 39 |
| Okeechobee: | 39 |
| Osceola Middle School: | 35 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (863) 462-5070 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 47
School number: 201
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: OKEECHOBEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 462-5076
Principal: Theda Bass
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 79
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://www.okee.k12.fl.us/web.nsf
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 65% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 70% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 69% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 546 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Region: 1
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 628 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 627 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 205
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 573
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 572
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 496 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 496 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 163
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 453
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 453
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 422 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 421 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 135
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 383
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 64% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 72% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 537 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 23% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Region: 1
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 664 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 664 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 609
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 612
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 512 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 512 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 470
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 473
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 420 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 420 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 386
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 387
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 64% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 58% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 62% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 70% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 534 |
| State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 660 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 660 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 186
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 601
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 600
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 517 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 517 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 147
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 464
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 463
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 409 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 409 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 369
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 538 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns| Here: | 498 |
| State average from 539 schools: | 523 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 541 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 542 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 793 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 793 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 535 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 535 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 368 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 368 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 166 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 58% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 89% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| Here: | 414 |
| State average from 526 schools: | 425 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 525 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 828 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 827 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 563 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 421 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 421 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 59% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| Here: | 383 |
| State average from 506 schools: | 397 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 50% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1282 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1582 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1585 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 42% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 66% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1691 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 62% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1824 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 72% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1906 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 32% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 56% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1834 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 3% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1893 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 294 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 46% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 30% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 17% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 49% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 30% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1426 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 27% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1540 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 70% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1675 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1658 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 27% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1815 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 17% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1908 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 69% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1882 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 26% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1960 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing| Here: | 77% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1358 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1519 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1595 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1673 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1821 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1894 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 312 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1859 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1817 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 280 |
| State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 277 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1450 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1561 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1649 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1686 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1795 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1889 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1892 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1939 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 120
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 221
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 374
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 60%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1214 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 286 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1505 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1551 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1647 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1793 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 314 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1901 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1835 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1807 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 295 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1420 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1552 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1635 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1662 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1798 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1934 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1896 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1937 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 137 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 621 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Informational (max 18)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 645 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 118 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 662 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Informational (max 18)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 230 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 668 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Functional (max 18)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 220 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 680 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 189 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 692 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 362 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 687 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Literary (max 18)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 268 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 692 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Informational (max 18)| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 112
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 294 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 194
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 303 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 318
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 274 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1607 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1636 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1571 |
| State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 65
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1659 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 289 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1672 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1619 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 52
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1821 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 296 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1823 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1745 |
| State average: | 1738 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 78
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1636 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1641 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1623 |
| State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 18
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1757 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1759 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1658 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 101
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1874 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1880 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1796 |
| State average: | 1755 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 85
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 254
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 670 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 258
Mean Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 672 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Median NPR: 58
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 285
Mean Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 687 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 254
Mean Scale Score| OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 671 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 65
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 259
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 682 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 286
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 700 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 280
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 276 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 80%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Okeechobee, FL
- Osceola Middle School in Okeechobee, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: