City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 6.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Lake Eola Charter School (2.9 miles): | 98 |
| Lake Howell High School (6.8 miles): | 68 |
| Olympia High School (11.6 miles): | 59 |
| Professional & Technical High School (17.9 miles): | 49 |
| C.O.P.E. School (18.6 miles): | 37 |
| Ae Fmec School (5.5 miles): | 23 |
| Community Education Partners-Se School (2.7 miles): | 10 |
| Pace Center For Girls School: | 6 |
Pace Center For Girls School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Orange County: | 44 |
| Orlando: | 42 |
| Pace Center For Girls School: | 6 |
1
heydi concepcion
May 3, 2012 @ 7:19 pm
Hello i been looking for a school since i got kicked out. Its really hard to look for a school until I found you guys online. I hope I get to hear from you guys even more.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 48
School number: 1691
School type: Senior High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Non-residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 843-1119
Principal: Debora Graves
The function/setting of the school: Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 51% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 22% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 57% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 419 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: D
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 137 schools: | 57% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 137 schools: | 53% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 296 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 296 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 275
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 275
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 250 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 250 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 141 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 139 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 136 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 441 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 540 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 134 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 139 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 177 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 125 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 31% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 69% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 70% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 471 |
| State average from 122 schools: | 535 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 126 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 125 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 205 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 205 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 189
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 189
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 6% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (89%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 7% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 1170 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 279 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 49% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 14 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1491 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 54% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1427 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 270 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 1 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1816 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 78% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1868 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 36% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 74% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1952 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 63% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1737 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 265 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 63% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 274 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 49% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 37% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 4% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 277 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 5% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1200 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1448 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 2% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 56% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1474 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 41% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 22% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1806 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 16% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 14% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1873 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1949 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1806 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 280 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 53% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 33% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1279 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1477 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1508 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%| Here: | 285 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 1786 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 1857 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1936 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%| Here: | 254 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1299 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 300 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 1388 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 285 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1452 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1764 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1872 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1932 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 64
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 2| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 435
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 9| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1266 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 294 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1455 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 1488 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%| Here: | 281 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1804 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1829 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 1913 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%| Here: | 272 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1213 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%| Here: | 281 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1395 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 286 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1526 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 303 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 1731 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1862 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1947 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 71 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 615 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 45 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 66 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 636 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 55 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 69 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 655 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 62 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 432 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 683 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 74 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 446 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 691 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 75 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 385 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 693 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 69 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 237 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 38%| Here: | 260 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 29%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 381
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%| Here: | 337 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS: | 5 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 20%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 14%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.