Pace Secondary School in Tallahassee, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 38.

3413 ZILLAH ST
Tallahassee, FL 32305

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Killearn Lakes Elementary School (12.9 miles):

88
The Of Arts & Sciences School (6.3 miles):

67
Springwood Elementary School (7.7 miles):

56
Fort Braden Elementary School (15.0 miles):

48
Florida State University School (2.9 miles):

41
Pace Secondary School:

38
Wakulla Middle School (19.8 miles):

29
Bond Elementary School (2.1 miles):

15
Greenville Hills Academy School (19.0 miles):

0
Pace Secondary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Leon County:

45
Tallahassee:

45
Pace Secondary School:

38

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (850) 488-8927 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 37
School number: 452
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: LEON
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 922-7065
Principal: Diane Brown
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
Senate District: 6

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 36 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 37 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 37 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 37 schools:

56%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 37 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 37 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 37 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 37 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

600
State average from 37 schools:

547
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 37 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 37 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 37 schools:

44%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

83%
State average from 36 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 36 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 36 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

65%
State average from 36 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 36 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 36 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 36 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 36 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

621
State average from 36 schools:

548
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 36 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 36 schools:

39%
Minority Rate
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

30%
State average from 36 schools:

42%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 36 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 36 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 36 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

63%
State average from 36 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 36 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 36 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 36 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 36 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

598
State average from 36 schools:

528
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 36 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 36 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 36 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (91%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (94%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (94%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

1450
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

58%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

17%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1319
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

224
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

83%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1514
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

92%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

6
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1460
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

58%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

33%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1585
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

202
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

92%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1473
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 2
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1533
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

227
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

192
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1505
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

221
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

1668
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

227
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1703
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

2
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 10
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 10%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

2
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 8%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1540
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

1478
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

217
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1668
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

227
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1703
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

15
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

21
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

28
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

188
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 15%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 15%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1437
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

216
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

1437
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1343
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 93

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1470
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

229
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1459
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

1516
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -58

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1361
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

185
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 1
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1361
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1407
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -46

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1657
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
PACE SECONDARY SCHOOL:

1663
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1547
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 115

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 22
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 32
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Tallahassee, FL
  5. Pace Secondary School in Tallahassee, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.