Potter Elementary School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 12.

3224 E CAYUGA ST
Tampa, FL 33610

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Westchase Elementary School (11.0 miles):

95
Muller Elementary Magnet School (5.9 miles):

73
Westshore Elementary School (10.7 miles):

60
Oldsmar Elementary School (15.4 miles):

50
Wilson Elementary School (18.2 miles):

38
West Tampa Elementary School (4.3 miles):

28
Riverhills Elementary School (3.3 miles):

16
Potter Elementary School:

12
Richardson Montessori Academy School (3.5 miles):

0
Potter Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Potter Elementary School:

12

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 276-5564 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 3521
School type: Elementary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 233-3693
Principal: Tracye Brown
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 59
Senate District: 18

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 734 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

54%
State average from 734 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 734 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

11%
State average from 733 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 734 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 733 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 734 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 734 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

411
State average from 734 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 733 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: D

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 734 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 735 schools:

46%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 273 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 239
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 245 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 244 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 216

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 219
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 273 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 239
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 735 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 734 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 734 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

16%
State average from 734 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 735 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 735 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

475
State average from 734 schools:

557
Percent Tested
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 734 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 734 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 734 schools:

45%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 268 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 268 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 229

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 241 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 207
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 265 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 265 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 225
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 711 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 711 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

70%
State average from 711 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

11%
State average from 711 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 711 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 711 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 711 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 711 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

450
State average from 711 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 711 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 711 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 711 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 243 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 218

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 196
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 239 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 239 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 214

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

31%
State average from 652 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

30%
State average from 652 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

72%
State average from 652 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

5%
State average from 650 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

50%
State average from 652 schools:

72%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 652 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 652 schools:

67%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 652 schools:

69%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

375
State average from 652 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 652 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 655 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 655 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 335 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 336 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 301 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 302 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 89
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 326 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

36%
State average from 643 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

37%
State average from 643 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

74%
State average from 643 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 643 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 643 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 643 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

344
State average from 643 schools:

420
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 643 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 644 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 644 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 286 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 284 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 78
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 232
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 231
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 267 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 266 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 74
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 222
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 221
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 272 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 73
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 220
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 219
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

38%
State average from 631 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

35%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 631 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

48%
State average from 631 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

39%
State average from 631 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

275
State average from 631 schools:

417
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 631 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 631 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 631 schools:

52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1060
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

40%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1365
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

42%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1381
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

262
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

278
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

40%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

48%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

12%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1257
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1469
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1549
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1156
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1465
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1407
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1364
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1506
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1494
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 104
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1165
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

278
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1355
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1407
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1341
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1404
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1472
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

111
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

608
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

39
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

66
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

46
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

67
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

644
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

51
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 64
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

272
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1076
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1293
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1307
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1173
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 134

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1311
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1306
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1221
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 84

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1120
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1325
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1335
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1212
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 122

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1431
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1417
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1270
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 147

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113
Mean Scale Score
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

594
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 27
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109
Mean Scale Score
Here:

616
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 37
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 105
Mean Scale Score
Here:

628
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 36
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 111
Mean Scale Score
Here:

592
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense (max 14): 8
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109
Mean Scale Score
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

623
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 53
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 106
Mean Scale Score
Here:

629
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 42
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 109
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

272
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 71%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 52%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Tampa, FL
  5. Potter Elementary School in Tampa, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.