Roosevelt Full Service Center School in West Palm Beach, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 2.

1601 TAMARIND AVE
West Palm Beach, FL 33407

Show street view No street view available for this location
Roosevelt Full Service Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
West Palm Beach:

47
Roosevelt Full Service Center:

2

1
Report this comment as inappropriate
Jun 13, 2011 @ 8:08 am
i would like to know how do i go about enrolling my son into your school. he is in the 10th grade at forest hill high school he didn't make all his credits to go to next grade.

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 803-9000 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 3355
School type: Senior High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 803-9050
Principal: William Pollard
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 84
Senate District: 29
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Roosevelt_Full_Service

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (72%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (66%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (71%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (60%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (72%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (59%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER:

241
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

83%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

3%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER:

3%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1551
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

232
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1818
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 44
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 34%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1696
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1706
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1732
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER:

21
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

34
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER:

11
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 55
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

215
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 25%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1717
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 43%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1664
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1730
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -66

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER:

1912
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER:

306
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 55%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1867
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1801
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 66

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 35
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 29
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.