City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
2.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Roosevelt Full Service Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Palm Beach County: | 45 |
West Palm Beach: | 47 |
Roosevelt Full Service Center: | 2 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (561) 803-9000 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 3355
School type: Senior High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 803-9050
Principal: William Pollard
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 84
Senate District: 29
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Roosevelt_Full_Service
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (90%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 8% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 10% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (72%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (66%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER: | 13% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (71%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (60%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (72%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (59%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 6% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER: | 241 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 83% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 13% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER: | 3% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1551 |
State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 231 |
State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 232 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1818 |
State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 283 |
State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 44
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER: | 3 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 34%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1696 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 270 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 241 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1706 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 238 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1732 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 262 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 650 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPRROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER: | 21 |
State average: | 61 |
Functional (max 18)ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER: | 8 |
State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 643 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPRROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER: | 11 |
State average: | 65 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER: | 5 |
State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 55
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 215 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 25%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1717 |
State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 261 |
State average: | 291 |
Percent Passing: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 43%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1664 |
State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1730 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -66
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 263 |
State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER: | 1912 |
State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500ROOSEVELT FULL SERVICE CENTER: | 306 |
State average: | 315 |
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 55%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1867 |
State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1801 |
State average: | 1901 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 66
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 677 |
State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Median NPR: 35
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 684 |
State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Median NPR: 29
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- West Palm Beach, FL
- Roosevelt Full Service Center School in West Palm Beach, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.