City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 52.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Killearn Lakes Elementary School (8.2 miles): | 88 |
| Quincy Correctional Institution School (18.2 miles): | 69 |
| Pineview Elementary School (4.4 miles): | 61 |
| Mehrdad Pepper Ghazvini Learning Center School (4.0 miles): | 53 |
| Sealey Elementary School: | 52 |
| Gadsden Elementary Magnet School (18.9 miles): | 44 |
| Stewart Street Elementary School (18.4 miles): | 35 |
| George W. Munroe Elementary School (19.9 miles): | 16 |
| Florida A & M University Lab County Superintendent's Office School (3.5 miles): | 1 |
Sealey Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Leon County: | 45 |
| Tallahassee: | 45 |
| Sealey Elementary School: | 52 |
1
Ashley Calderon
Mar 14, 2012 @ 9:21 pm
I just moved here to the state of Florida and I was wanting some info on how or when I need to enroll my daughter in school. Plerase let me know! :)
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 37
School number: 431
School type: Elementary
District Name: LEON
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 488-1239
Principal: Tom Inserra
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
Senate District: 6
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 58% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 67% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 536 |
| State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 97% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority Rate
Region: 2| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1193 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1189 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1077
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1073
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 724 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 724 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 376
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 671
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 669
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 485 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 425
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 422
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 150 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 48% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 61% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 522 |
| State average from 959 schools: | 560 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
Region: 3| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1264 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1259 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1129
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 777 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 773 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 705
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 701
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 241 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 202
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 202
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 470 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 468 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 417
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 415
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 86% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 536 |
| State average from 954 schools: | 544 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 86% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 76% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 43% |
Making Reading Gains
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 67% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 569 |
| State average from 862 schools: | 539 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 45% |
| State average from 865 schools: | 58% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 865 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 234 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 235 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 62% |
Making Math Gains
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 63% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 459 |
| State average from 848 schools: | 413 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 58% |
Minority Rate
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 48% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 243 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 244 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 74% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 459 |
| State average from 834 schools: | 412 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 832 schools: | 54% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1253 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1591 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 19 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1612 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 1 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1987 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2067 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 5% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 49% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1311 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1576 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 328 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 74% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1649 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 29% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1977 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 74% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2060 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 91% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 82% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1414 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1577 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 05%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1656 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2000 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2019 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 64%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1466 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1549 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 321 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1738 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1992 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2037 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 87%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 115
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 574
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1361 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1522 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1635 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2002 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 2050 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 71%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 307 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1384 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1539 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1680 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1984 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2043 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 88%| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 118 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 627 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 56 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 130 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 651 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 68 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 127 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 668 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 73 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 1 |
| State average: | 201 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 652 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 703 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 71 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 553 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 719 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 75 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 129
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 12%| Here: | 308 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 571
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 12%| Here: | 318 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 62%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1437 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1674 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1696 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 93| Here: | 1603 |
| State average: | 1397 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1740 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1753 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 93| Here: | 1660 |
| State average: | 1532 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 320 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1418 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1600 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 333 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1621 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 104| Here: | 1517 |
| State average: | 1414 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1681 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 336 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1683 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 102| Here: | 1581 |
| State average: | 1519 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 81
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 70| Here: | 645 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 75
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 73| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 75
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 83| Here: | 682 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 81
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 70| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 635 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 75
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 84| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 668 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 74
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 82| SEALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 675 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 71
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%| Here: | 312 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 75%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 56%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.