Seminole County Detention Center School in Sanford, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 1.

200 BUSH BLVD
Sanford, FL 32773

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (14.9 miles):

98
Teague Middle School (10.4 miles):

68
Westminster Academy Charter School (17.4 miles):

57
Colonial High School (13.6 miles):

47
Southwestern Middle School (17.9 miles):

36
Corner Lake Middle School (16.4 miles):

24
Legacy High Charter School (19.2 miles):

12
Seminole County Detention Center School:

1
Ae Yop School (16.5 miles):

0
Seminole County Detention Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Seminole County:

56
Sanford:

37
Seminole County Detention Center:

1

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 330-6750 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 59
School number: 9206
School type: Senior High
District Name: SEMINOLE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 321-2308
Principal: Gene Grace
The function/setting of the school: Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 34
Senate District: 22

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (84%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26 (87%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24 (80%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (73%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23 (72%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (84%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (87%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (87%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (90%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (92%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

1836
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

23%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

54%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

80%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1786
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

40%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1893
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

69%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

23%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

46%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

1698
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1802
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1605
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1772
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1624
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1625
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1769
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1867
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

295
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

7
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

13
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

52
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

10
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

16
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

699
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

58
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

255
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 24%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1538
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

1589
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

1638
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -49

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1818
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

283
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1805
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1785
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 20

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
SEMINOLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER:

668
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 27
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 32
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

217
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 10%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 50%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 20%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Sanford, FL
  5. Seminole County Detention Center School in Sanford, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.