Silver Trail Middle School in Pembroke Pines, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 84.

18300 SHERIDAN ST
Pembroke Pines, FL 33331

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Falcon Cove Middle School (2.8 miles):

91
Silver Trail Middle School:

84
Biscayne Elementary School (19.4 miles):

65
Mater Academy Middle Of International Studies School (18.6 miles):

54
Paul W. Bell Middle School (18.0 miles):

45
Miami Lakes Middle School (8.9 miles):

31
Brownsville Middle School (17.0 miles):

13
Madison Middle School (14.4 miles):

7
Silver Trail Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Broward County:

47
Pembroke Pines:

62
Silver Trail Middle School:

84

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (754) 323-4300 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 3331
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (754) 323-4385
Principal: Stephen Frazier
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 101
Senate District: 34

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

83%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

65%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

615
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

64%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1688 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1688 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 533
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1641
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1594

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1641
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1594
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 615 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 615 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 193
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 606
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 585

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 606
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 585
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 205 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 205 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 191

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 191
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 773 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 773 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 251
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 744
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 727

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 744
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 727
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 406 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 406 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 126
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 388
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 388
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

61%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

621
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1752 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1752 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 607
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1711
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1650

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1711
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1651
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 714 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 714 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 236
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 708
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 687

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 708
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 688
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 712 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 712 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 257
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 686
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 664

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 686
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 664
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 330 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 330 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 113
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 321
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 310

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 321
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 310
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 197 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 197 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

58%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

83%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

622
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

17%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1720 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1719 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 561
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1689
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1636

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1689
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1638
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 712 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 712 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 234
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 705
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 686

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 705
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 687
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 208 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 191
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 683 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 683 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 223
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 668
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 649

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 668
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 649
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 290 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 289 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 89
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 269
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 175 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

59%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

601
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1741 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1741 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 565
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1699
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1700
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 739 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 739 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 248
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 731
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 731
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 211 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 671 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 670 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 198
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 650
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 650
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

495
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

56%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1667 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1667 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 501
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1637
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1637
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 738 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 738 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 222

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 734
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 734
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 48

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 181
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 181
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 627 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 627 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 193

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 605
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 605
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 75

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 217 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 61

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 205
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 205
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 104
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 104
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 49

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 148
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 148
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

463
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

11%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

55%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1877
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1935
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2007
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

18%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

28%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1878
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

25%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1936
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

80%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2004
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

31%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

28%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1842
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1930
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

340
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1996
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

333
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1844
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1944
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1988
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 613
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 25%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 27%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 99%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1852
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1914
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1991
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1858
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1944
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2001
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

543
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

692
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

80
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

598
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

703
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

83
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

571
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

713
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

83
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

12
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 569
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

361
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 87%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 21%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 19%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1819
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1823
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1752
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1922
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1926
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1832
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 94

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1957
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1965
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1901
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1811
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1819
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1776
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 43

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1943
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1950
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1836
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 114

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1989
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1999
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1927
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 73

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 584
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 80
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 571
Mean Scale Score
Here:

697
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 79
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 582
Mean Scale Score
Here:

709
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 584
Mean Scale Score
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

693
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 81
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 571
Mean Scale Score
Here:

712
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 582
Mean Scale Score
Here:

726
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 9): 8
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 577
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

346
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 79%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
SILVER TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 98%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.