Mater Academy Middle Of International Studies School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 54.

795 NW 32 ST
Miami, FL 33127

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (19.4 miles):

98
Coral Way K-8 Center School (3.7 miles):

75
Ben Sheppard Annex School (9.5 miles):

63
Mater Academy Middle Of International Studies School:

54
Ruben Dario Middle School (9.3 miles):

50
Lake Stevens Elementary School (10.4 miles):

34
Seagull School (19.9 miles):

21
Charter On The Beach Middle School (6.0 miles):

8
Mater Academy Middle Of International Studies School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
This School:

54

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 634-0445 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6047
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 634-0446
Principal: Beatriz Morris
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 109
Senate District: 36
School Web Address: www.materacademyeast.dadeschools.net

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

59%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

44%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

549
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

78%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

516
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

1725
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

61%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1858
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

17%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

67%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1951
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

63%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

50%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

44%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1704
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

50%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1828
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

17%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

46%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1880
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MATER ACADEMY MIDDLE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES:

25%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1845
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1816
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.