City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
9.
Other nearby schools ratings:
South Tech Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Palm Beach County: | 45 |
Boynton Beach: | 34 |
South Tech Academy School: | 9 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (561) 369-7004 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 1571
School type: Senior High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 369-7024
Principal: Jeanette Jimenez
Conversion charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 3 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 22
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 86
Senate District: 29
School Web Address: www.southtechacademy.com
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 33% |
State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 74% |
State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 86% |
State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 32% |
State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 44% |
State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math GainsSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 79% |
State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 42% |
State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 73% |
State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 473 |
State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 60% |
State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 81% |
State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 538 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 538 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 250
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 30% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 520
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 516
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 520
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 515
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 38% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 27% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 196
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 196
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 227 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 359 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 359 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 162
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 349
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 349
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 16% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 28% |
State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 83% |
State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 20% |
State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 40% |
State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math GainsSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 71% |
State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 44% |
State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 57% |
State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 411 |
State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 53% |
State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority RateHere: | 78% |
State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 583 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 582 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 312
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 25% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 558
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 542
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 556
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 538
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 34% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 235 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 235 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 26% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 201 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 186
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 184
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 335 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 172
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 322
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 316
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 323
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 314
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 7% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 26% |
State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 66% |
State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 74% |
State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 19% |
State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 44% |
State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 77% |
State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 47% |
State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 75% |
State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 428 |
State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 56% |
State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority RateHere: | 75% |
State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 590 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 592 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 270
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 547
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 529
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 546
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 528
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 216 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 194
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 346 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 347 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 154
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 17% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 328
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 321
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 327
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 320
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1655 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 22% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 52% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 95% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1813 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 3% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 22% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 54% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 18% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 95% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1801 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 11% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 38% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 81% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1920 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 17% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 48% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 26% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 35% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1924 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingHere: | 47% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 39% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 36% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 15% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 25% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 14 |
State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 355 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 23% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 21% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 73% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 9 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 27% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 44% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 29% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 8 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1668 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 380 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 19% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 44% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 31% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 94% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 5 |
State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1742 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 365 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 28% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 39% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 23% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 90% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1811 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 363 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 13% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 42% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 85% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1959 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 50% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 5% |
State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 73% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2004 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingHere: | 88% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 31% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 4% |
State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 71% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1627 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 354 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1747 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1834 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 343 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1883 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 305 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1901 |
State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 355 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 288 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1682 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 383 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1701 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 356 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1831 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 367 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1927 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 303 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1979 |
State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 114
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 326
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1603 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 350 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 1757 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 350 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1727 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1877 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1868 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 289 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 333 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 288 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1622 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 370 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1704 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 357 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1724 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1939 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1965 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 184 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 652 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 16 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of StudentsSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 159 |
State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 671 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Functional (max 18)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 15 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 11 |
State average: | 10 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 162 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 682 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 279 |
State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 689 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 257 |
State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 702 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPRSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 60 |
State average: | 65 |
Functional (max 18)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 7 |
State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 161
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 328 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 70%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 291
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 277 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Boynton Beach, FL
- South Tech Academy School in Boynton Beach, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: