City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
16.
Other nearby schools ratings:
South Tech Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Palm Beach County: | 45 |
Boynton Beach: | 34 |
South Tech Academy School: | 16 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (561) 369-7004 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 1571
School type: Senior High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 369-7024
Principal: Diane Tidwell
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 22
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 86
Senate District: 29
School Web Address: www.southtechacademy.com
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 33% |
State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in MathSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 74% |
State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 86% |
State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 32% |
State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 44% |
State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 79% |
State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 42% |
State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 73% |
State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 473 |
State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 60% |
State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 81% |
State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 538 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 538 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 250
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 30% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 520
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 516
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 520
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 515
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 38% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 27% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 196
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 196
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 227 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 359 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 359 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 162
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 349
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 349
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 16% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 28% |
State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 83% |
State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 20% |
State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 40% |
State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 71% |
State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 44% |
State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 57% |
State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 411 |
State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 53% |
State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority RateHere: | 78% |
State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 583 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 582 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 312
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 25% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 558
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 542
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 556
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 538
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 34% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 235 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 235 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 26% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 201 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 186
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 184
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 335 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 172
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 322
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 316
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 323
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 314
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 7% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 26% |
State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 66% |
State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 74% |
State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 19% |
State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 44% |
State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 77% |
State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 47% |
State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 75% |
State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 428 |
State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 56% |
State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority RateHere: | 75% |
State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 590 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 592 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 270
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 547
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 529
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 546
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 528
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 216 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 194
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 346 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 347 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 154
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 17% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 328
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 321
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 327
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 320
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 20% |
State average from 370 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 56% |
State average from 370 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 84% |
State average from 370 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 30% |
State average from 370 schools: | 41% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 35% |
State average from 370 schools: | 52% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 66% |
State average from 370 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 42% |
State average from 370 schools: | 49% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 66% |
State average from 370 schools: | 67% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 399 |
State average from 370 schools: | 482 |
Percent TestedHere: | 98% |
State average from 370 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 57% |
State average from 372 schools: | 38% |
Minority RateHere: | 72% |
State average from 372 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 548 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 547 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 96% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 267
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 18% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 523
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 523
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 96% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 96% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 12% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 38% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 197 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 197 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 97% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 196
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 340 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 341 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 96% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 163
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 14% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 331
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 333
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 24% |
State average from 360 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 50% |
State average from 361 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 60% |
State average from 361 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 42% |
State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 65% |
State average from 361 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 50% |
State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 291 |
State average from 361 schools: | 374 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 361 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 52% |
State average from 362 schools: | 38% |
Minority RateHere: | 69% |
State average from 362 schools: | 47% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 571 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 573 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 275
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 22% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 548
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 550
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 93
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 159
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 160
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 183 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 77
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 13% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 178
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 36% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 179
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 97
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 188
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 188
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 326 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 141
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 319
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 320
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 8% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 29% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 16% |
State average from 348 schools: | 42% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 41% |
State average from 348 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 67% |
State average from 348 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 33% |
State average from 348 schools: | 51% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 58% |
State average from 348 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 46% |
State average from 348 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 261 |
State average from 348 schools: | 371 |
Percent TestedHere: | 98% |
State average from 348 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 37% |
State average from 347 schools: | 38% |
Minority RateSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 66% |
State average from 348 schools: | 45% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1655 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 22% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 52% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 95% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1813 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 22% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 54% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 18% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 95% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 23 |
State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1801 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 11% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 38% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 81% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1920 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 17% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 48% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 26% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 35% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1924 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingHere: | 47% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 39% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 36% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 15% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 25% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 355 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 23% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 21% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 73% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 9 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 27% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 44% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 1% |
State average: | 5% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 29% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1668 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 380 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 19% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 44% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 31% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 94% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1742 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 365 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 28% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 39% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 23% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 90% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1811 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 363 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 13% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 42% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 85% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1959 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 50% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 73% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2004 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 328 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 88% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 31% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 71% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1627 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 354 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1747 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1834 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 343 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 1883 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 305 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1901 |
State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 355 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 288 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1682 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 383 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1701 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 356 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1831 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 367 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1927 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 303 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 1979 |
State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 114
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 326
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1603 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 350 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1757 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 350 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1727 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1877 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1868 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 289 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 333 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 288 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1622 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 370 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1704 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 357 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1724 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1939 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1965 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 184 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 652 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 16 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 671 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 162 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 682 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Functional (max 18)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 15 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 16 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 279 |
State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 689 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 257 |
State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale ScoreSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 702 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPRSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 60 |
State average: | 65 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 161
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 328 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 70%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 291
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 277 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1832 |
State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 295 |
State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1830 |
State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 1807 |
State average: | 1779 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 24
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1822 |
State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 281 |
State average: | 291 |
Percent Passing: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1819 |
State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1850 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -31
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1887 |
State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1892 |
State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006SOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 1866 |
State average: | 1821 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 26
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1950 |
State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 315 |
Percent Passing: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1950 |
State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1905 |
State average: | 1901 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 44
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 265
Mean Scale ScoreSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 695 |
State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Median NPR: 62
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 263
Mean Scale ScoreSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 693 |
State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 264
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 706 |
State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 262
Mean Scale ScoreSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 707 |
State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 280
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 277 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 29%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - CombinedSOUTH TECH ACADEMY: | 3 |
State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 82%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Boynton Beach, FL
- South Tech Academy School in Boynton Beach, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: