Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Michigan forum
Enrollment in St. Clair County Intervention Academy School
2006 Student Enrollment: 44
Female Enrollment: 4 Male Enrollment: 40
Special Education Enrollment: 44
Special Education Female Enrollment: 4
Special Education Male Enrollment: 40
White Enrollment (%): 79.5%
Here:
79.5%
State average from 3572 schools:
70.3%
Black Enrollment (%): 18.2%
This school:
18.2%
State average from 3572 schools:
20.5%
American Indian Enrollment (%): 2.3%
Here:
2.3%
State average from 3572 schools:
1.2%
Genders in St. Clair County Intervention Academy School
Races in St. Clair County Intervention Academy School
2005 Student Enrollment: 39
Female Enrollment: 1 Male Enrollment: 38
Special Education Enrollment: 39
Special Education Female Enrollment: 1
Special Education Male Enrollment: 38
White Enrollment (%): 71.8%
Here:
71.8%
State average from 3644 schools:
70.9%
Black Enrollment (%): 20.5%
Here:
20.5%
State average from 3644 schools:
20.5%
Hispanic Enrollment (%): 7.7%
Here:
7.7%
State average from 3644 schools:
4.6%
Genders in St. Clair County Intervention Academy School
Races in St. Clair County Intervention Academy School
2004 Student Enrollment: 35
Female Enrollment: 3 Male Enrollment: 32
Special Education Enrollment: 35
Special Education Female Enrollment: 3
Special Education Male Enrollment: 32
White Enrollment (%): 85.7%
Here:
85.7%
State average from 3582 schools:
72.3%
Black Enrollment (%): 5.7%
St. Clair County Intervention Academy School:
5.7%
State average from 3582 schools:
19.3%
Hispanic Enrollment (%): 8.6%
Here:
8.6%
State average from 3582 schools:
4.5%
Genders in St. Clair County Intervention Academy School
Races in St. Clair County Intervention Academy School
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Statistics:
Met Overall AYP: Yes
School Safety Practices:
Warning codes used to alert faculty of a critical incident: Yes Tactical evacuation route for students or entry routes for emergency support teams: Yes Off-site staging area for assembly and communication at the onset of critical incident: Yes Emergency communication tree or plan: Yes Facility blueprints and site plan on file with emergency support team: Yes Control access to site during school hours (doors locked or monitored): Yes Control access to grounds during school hours (gates locked or monitored): Yes Students required to pass through metal detectors each day: Yes Visitors required to pass through metal detectors: Yes Campus closed for most students during lunch: Yes Integrated home-land security in school practices into school safety plans: Yes Random sweeps for weapons: Yes Require clear book bags or ban book bags: Yes Require students to wear badges or picture IDs: Yes Require staff to wear badges or picture IDs: Yes Provide staff training in risk assessment: Yes Security cameras used to monitor the school: Yes Telephones provided in most classrooms: Yes Emergency button provided in lavatories: No In compliance with the state law that requires that a student who brings a firearm to school be expelled for one year: Yes In compliance with Elem. and Sec. Edu. Act (ESEA), that requires referral to juvenile delinquency system of any student who brings a firearm to school: Yes School wide training in positive behavioral support and interventions: Yes
School Safety Plans:
Safety plan exists - Shootings: Yes Safety plan exists - Riots: Yes Safety plan exists - Bomb scares or comparable threats (excluding fire): Yes Safety plan exists - Disaster planning (tornadoes, floods, chemical spill, etc.): Yes Safety plan exists - Hostages: Yes Safety plan exists - Lock down: Yes
School Prevention Programs:
Implemented a violence prevention curriculum: No Practiced behavior modification/intervention with students: Yes Provided group counseling (social work) or therapeutic activity for students: Yes Provided peer mentoring or coaching program: Yes Provided peer mediation (student court) in resolving conduct problems: No Provided conflict resolution training to staff and students: Yes Provided programs that promote a sense of social integration among students: Yes Established a hot line for students to report problems: No Provided training and assistance in classroom management to teachers: Yes Revised or reviewed school wide discipline policy: No Made architectural or environmental modifications to reduce crime or violence: No Used a paid law enforcement or security service: Yes Implemented a drug prevention service: No Conducted community service projects on prevention: No Implemented teacher/staff training on violence/drug prevention: No Conducted public/parent awareness activities on violence/drug prevention: No Offered after-school or before-school programs: No Provided alternative education programs: Yes Underwent curriculum acquisition or development: No Provided services for out-of-school youth (school-age): Yes Administered special one-time events (not included in the above mentioned programs): Yes Involved organizations in administering drug and violence-prevention services via joint service delivery (including referrals): Yes Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via teacher/staff training: Yes Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via public awareness activities: Yes Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via fund raising: No Allowed students to participate in the design, delivery or critiquing of a drug or violence prevention program: No Balanced and restorative justice conferencing (aka transformative conferencing): No
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: