Terrace Community Middle School in Thonotosassa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 92.

11734 JEFFERSON RD
Thonotosassa, FL 33592

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Terrace Community Middle School:

92
Wilson Middle School (11.1 miles):

87
Walker Middle School (14.9 miles):

74
Trinity Upper School (9.7 miles):

60
Middle Tt School (9.8 miles):

45
Roland Park K-8 School (12.7 miles):

36
Raymond B. Stewart Middle School (16.4 miles):

16
Carl Sagan Academy School (5.2 miles):

4
Terrace Community Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Thonotosassa:

53
Terrace Community Middle School:

92

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 987-6555 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 6606
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 987-6565
Principal: Gary Hocevar
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 60
Senate District: 12

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

90%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

72%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

653
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 631 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 631 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 202
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 616
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 565

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 615
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 564
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 347 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 347 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 340
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 308

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 339
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

90%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

91%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

661
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

9%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

41%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 526 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 526 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 173
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 518
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 490

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 518
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 489
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 313 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 313 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 106
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 309
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 309
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

90%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

81%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

672
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

3%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

41%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 495 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 495 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 147
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 477
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 441

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 476
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 440
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 295 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 285
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 262

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

87%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

77%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

614
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

9%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

38%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 397 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 397 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 385
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 245 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 245 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 237
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 236
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

86%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

90%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

495
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

9%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 352 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 352 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 88
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 342
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 342
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 55

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 214
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 214
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

86%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

88%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

502
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

9%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

36%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2001
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

364
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

45%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

27%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

94%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2019
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

23%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2041
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1915
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

28%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1974
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2012
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1968
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

358
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1992
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2049
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

360
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 11

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1898
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

362
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1951
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2022
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

352
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 174
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1946
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1975
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2059
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

368
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 10
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1854
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

352
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1985
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

355
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2047
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 37%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

175
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

706
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

88
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

18
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

177
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

716
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

89
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

146
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

721
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

88
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

12
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

9
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 148
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

365
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 86%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 24%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 99%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1844
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1837
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1823
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 14

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1978
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1979
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1940
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 38

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2027
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2030
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1955
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 75

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1856
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1859
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1799
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 59

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1978
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1979
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1908
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2042
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2043
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1963
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 80

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 179
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 80
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 130
Mean Scale Score
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

705
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 84
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale Score
TERRACE COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

722
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 89
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 179
Mean Scale Score
Here:

703
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 130
Mean Scale Score
Here:

727
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 90
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale Score
Here:

739
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 92
Number Sense (max 9): 8
Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 88
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

367
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 86%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 100%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.