The 500 Role Model Academy School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 6.

6300 NW 27 AVE
Miami, FL 33147

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (19.6 miles):

98
Arvida Middle School (15.2 miles):

75
Western High School (19.6 miles):

62
Somerset Academy Charter Middle School (19.5 miles):

50
Henry H. Filer Middle School (3.4 miles):

34
Cutler Ridge Middle School (18.2 miles):

18
Madison Middle School (1.6 miles):

7
The 500 Role Model Academy School:

6
The 500 Role Model Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
The 500 Role Model Academy School:

6

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 691-7771 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 8119
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 9
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 694-0921
Principal: Miguel L Torress
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 2 in Need of Improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 109
Senate District: 33
School Web Address: http://500rolemodelacademy.dadeschools.net

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

15%
State average from 4 schools:

53%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

20%
State average from 4 schools:

52%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

66%
State average from 4 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

4%
State average from 4 schools:

31%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 4 schools:

60%
Making Math Gains
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

56%
State average from 4 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 4 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 4 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

318
State average from 4 schools:

471
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 4 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: F

Grade in 2009: F

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 4 schools:

81%
Minority Rate
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

99%
State average from 4 schools:

91%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

4%
State average from 4 schools:

52%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

6%
State average from 4 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 4 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 4 schools:

33%
Making Reading Gains
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

46%
State average from 4 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 4 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

63%
State average from 4 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 4 schools:

61%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

357
State average from 4 schools:

467
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 4 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: F

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 4 schools:

74%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 4 schools:

75%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (100%)
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

34%
State average from 4 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

24%
State average from 4 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

71%
State average from 4 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

3%
State average from 4 schools:

28%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 4 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 4 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 4 schools:

63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 4 schools:

69%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

405
State average from 4 schools:

491
Percent Tested
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

98%
State average from 4 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 4 schools:

68%
Minority Rate
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

100%
State average from 4 schools:

89%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 4 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Math
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

16%
State average from 4 schools:

54%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

88%
State average from 4 schools:

90%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 4 schools:

72%
Making Math Gains
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

60%
State average from 4 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 4 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

377
State average from 4 schools:

424
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 4 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

87%
State average from 4 schools:

72%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 4 schools:

89%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 62
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 62
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (96%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 53
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 53
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

6%
State average from 4 schools:

50%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

5%
State average from 4 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 4 schools:

87%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

32%
State average from 4 schools:

56%
Making Math Gains
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

44%
State average from 4 schools:

63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 4 schools:

58%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

218
State average from 4 schools:

358
Percent Tested
Here:

91%
State average from 4 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 4 schools:

72%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 4 schools:

88%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1388
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

253
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

44%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

44%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

11%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1570
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

42%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

26%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1616
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

70%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

221
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

80%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

2%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

2%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1345
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

59%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1483
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

66%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

10%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1758
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

285
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1328
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1483
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1623
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

200
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

1290
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

221
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1555
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1695
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1339
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1611
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1600
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

221
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1432
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1602
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

260
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

1703
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

272
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

32
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

629
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

24
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

41
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

626
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

19
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

39
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

633
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

17
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1418
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 70%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1378
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1249
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 129

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1526
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 77%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1551
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1352
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 198

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

1840
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

300
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1866
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1592
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 274

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

211
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1334
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 70%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1329
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
THE 500 ROLE MODEL ACADEMY:

1409
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -80

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1581
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1606
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1444
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 163

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1743
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1772
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1561
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 211

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale Score
Here:

623
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 21
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 39
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 32
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 25
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale Score
Here:

623
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 20
Number Sense (max 10): 3
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 39
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 40
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 30
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 45
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

218
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 6
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 73%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.